![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Asia
Watch: Speedy Tuesday ST1
Posts: 134
|
5066 vs 5065 Aquanaut sizes
ive been thinking of getting an aquanaut as my first Patek.
i’ve recently had the opportunity to try both the 5066 (36mm) and 5065 (38mm) on my wrist and i’m honestly still undecided on which model suits my wrist more. The 5066’s 36mm size feels right , but the dial feels a bit congested as compared to the 5065 and the wrist presence loses out to the 5065 too. I’m wondering what the esteemed folks of this forum would think between the two sizes. thanks in advance ! ![]() ![]() Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
IG: The.Wrist.Analyst |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: somewhere else
Watch: one I'm wearing
Posts: 474
|
since I have 5066 that's my choice I'm 6 foot 200lbs love the vintage size on me........most here are going to vote for the bigger size.....btw 5066 is really 35 not 36
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: wHerE do U liv
Watch: President
Posts: 1,408
|
Get the 5065 if you're going to get a vintage one.
__________________
5164R Aquanaut "Tiffany & Co" 18238 Champagne Day Date |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: USA
Watch: ing my wrist
Posts: 1,160
|
I think the 5066 looks better with the dial being a little more spread out, but either size works on you. The 5066 is what I'd opt for.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,119
|
5065 is my vote, pretty cool look to have the "flat" strap versus molded and flush to the case as is with all modern Aquas
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: US
Posts: 65
|
5065 is the best in my opinion. Case size feels modern and aged very well.
Current Aquanauts are even larger. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Real Name: Frank
Location: Dallas,NY,Colo.
Watch: Patek 5168, 5170P
Posts: 2,517
|
I favored my 5065 very much, but it is currently sitting in deep water in Lake Malawi, sad to say.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: US
Posts: 65
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Santa Fe
Posts: 1,871
|
Either is good but my preference is the 5066. It looks superb on your wrist and doesn't dominate your arm.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Real Name: Frank
Location: Dallas,NY,Colo.
Watch: Patek 5168, 5170P
Posts: 2,517
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: USA
Watch: N/A
Posts: 470
|
Quote:
OP, they both look great on your wrist. I’d probably go for the 5065. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Asia
Watch: Speedy Tuesday ST1
Posts: 134
|
Thx all for your views and recommendations.
Its crazy! The price difference that 2mm in case size can make. Its a USD 15.2k difference between the 5065 and 5066 that i had the chance to view last week.
__________________
IG: The.Wrist.Analyst |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Brazil
Posts: 85
|
![]() I love my 5066. The smaller size is perfect. Interestingly it’s the only watch that I’ve received complements wearing. Not the 5711, not any other patek or rolex, but the small aquanaut! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Here and there...
Posts: 1,872
|
5066 looks better on your wrist. No overhang - it fits perfectly.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Asia
Watch: Speedy Tuesday ST1
Posts: 134
|
Awesome !
__________________
IG: The.Wrist.Analyst |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,375
|
Agree with others that the smaller size looks better on your wrist. Personally I prefer the current Aquanaut design and like the size of 5065. As a result my answer would be 5165.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Asia
Watch: Speedy Tuesday ST1
Posts: 134
|
Quote:
however, im leaning to the 5066 which means the only way for me is to go vintage given there isnt a 36mm modern equivalent.
__________________
IG: The.Wrist.Analyst |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: U.S
Watch: Rolex, PP, AP, GS
Posts: 5,737
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: London
Posts: 15
|
5065A strikes the right balance IMHO.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.