The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28 August 2024, 11:48 PM   #1
isgrb
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 122
Offshore - Diver or Chronograph?

I know the Offshore is the ‘entry-level’ AP but I’m actually quite fond of them.

That said, I can’t make up my mind between the latest gen diver (15720) or chronograph (26420), this would be my first AP.

Ignoring color-ways and steel vs. TI etc., which model do you prefer and why?
isgrb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 August 2024, 12:03 AM   #2
ikincooper
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Niki
Location: UK
Watch: Too many
Posts: 814
I think both options are great and I certainly love my diver.

The above said, using the timing bezel on it is a PITA so if you’re planning to use this function, I’d suggest the chronograph. The other plus for the chronographs are that the vast majority have ceramic bezels which will not show love marks the same as the steel divers.

All threads need photos, so here one to get things going and to help you decide which reference you prefer most.



All the best, Niki


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ikincooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 August 2024, 12:14 AM   #3
Octagon Guy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Asia
Posts: 239
Quote:
Originally Posted by isgrb View Post
I know the Offshore is the ‘entry-level’ AP but I’m actually quite fond of them.

That said, I can’t make up my mind between the latest gen diver (15720) or chronograph (26420), this would be my first AP.

Ignoring color-ways and steel vs. TI etc., which model do you prefer and why?
The real entry level, in terms of watchmaking, are actually the ROs. Back to your question. Most will buy a chronograph as their 1st AP (probably looks better aesthetically) but personal choice is the Diver. It looks sporty but at the same time, easy to read the time like a RO.
Octagon Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 August 2024, 01:24 AM   #4
Potawatomi
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Arizona
Posts: 902
I had and sold the diver. I really regret selling that thing.
Potawatomi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 August 2024, 01:54 AM   #5
ts3
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,464
I'd get a preowned ceramic diver 15707CE and I'll never own a watch with a 4:30 date.
ts3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 August 2024, 02:03 AM   #6
APhound
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 2,290
Offshore - Diver or Chronograph?

I have both and prefer the 43. Can’t explain it, I just love it.
There’s nothing wrong with the diver.


Maybe consider the 43 without the chrono. I saw one and it’s really sweet. Might be the right compromise if you’re torn.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
APhound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 August 2024, 02:42 AM   #7
messikens
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: SFO
Posts: 1,218
Chrono by a mile but potentially biased since I have one.

New 43mm wears like a charm. Chrono function is actually useful (at least more so than a diver).

No awkward dial crown like the diver that sticks out like a sore thumb.

IMO also better / more interesting dial layout and colors (esp the taupe version)
messikens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 August 2024, 02:45 AM   #8
messikens
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: SFO
Posts: 1,218
Quote:
Originally Posted by messikens View Post
Chrono by a mile but potentially biased since I have one.

New 43mm wears like a charm. Chrono function is actually useful (at least more so than a diver).

No awkward dial crown like the diver that sticks out like a sore thumb.

IMO also better / more interesting dial layout and colors (esp the taupe version)

Last comment I'd make in favor of the ROO Chronos : plenty of them either have Ceramic bezels or rubber bezel (for non-chrono) which gives me a bit more piece of mind
messikens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 August 2024, 02:56 AM   #9
gretch6364
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Aspen
Posts: 844
If buying today...I would also say the 43mm. If AP redesigned the diver...they could have a big hit on their hands. IMHO...they just need to:

1. sink the case back like the 43 and curve the bezel/crystal like the 43
2. shave 2mm of thickness off
3. redesign the hour hand
4. release more with ceramic bezels
gretch6364 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 August 2024, 02:59 AM   #10
Vince_76
"TRF" Member
 
Vince_76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,877
Quote:
Originally Posted by gretch6364 View Post
If buying today...I would also say the 43mm. If AP redesigned the diver...they could have a big hit on their hands. IMHO...they just need to:

1. sink the case back like the 43 and curve the bezel/crystal like the 43
2. shave 2mm of thickness off
3. redesign the hour hand
4. release more with ceramic bezels
I’d be in for this. Also the 10 o’clock crown bothers me.

@OP - I’d vote for the chrono - a bit more interesting and aesthetically pleasing IMO. But I do quite like the khaki green diver.
__________________
AP 15500ST (Silver) // ♛ Rolex 126334 (Blue Roman, Fluted, Jubilee) // Ω Moonswatch (Mission to Pluto) // G-Shock GA2100-1A1
Vince_76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 August 2024, 03:28 AM   #11
isgrb
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 122
Excellent feedback so far, thanks all.

I must admit the biggest drawback to the diver (in my eyes) is the crown at 10 o’clock. I don’t mind the steel bezel and I like the fact that it’s more robust than the chrono but that is definitely the biggest drawback for me.

The chronograph dial is busier for sure but looks a bit more refined. Of course it’s bigger than the diver too but I’m attracted to the curvature of the crystal and bezel.
isgrb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 August 2024, 03:33 AM   #12
ikincooper
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Niki
Location: UK
Watch: Too many
Posts: 814
Just to add, strangely I visually like the 10 o clock crown on the diver as it’s fairly unique. It’s just totally impractical to use when on the wrist! Having a ceramic bezel on the diver would be


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ikincooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 August 2024, 04:13 AM   #13
Vivalas
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Stephen
Location: UK
Watch: AP
Posts: 2,643
Always preferred the chrono’s myself.

Vivalas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 August 2024, 08:31 PM   #14
Lkdub24
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Earth
Posts: 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivalas View Post
Always preferred the chrono’s myself.


+1 for this ROO

The new offshores with the taper wear nicely even on smaller wrists like mine. The ceramic bezel is another plus.
Lkdub24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 August 2024, 10:15 PM   #15
gretch6364
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Aspen
Posts: 844
I am not sure the dual crown on any of the internal bezel watches are practical to actually use. It is sort of the ROO Diver’s calling card and doubt we will ever see that change. IMHO
gretch6364 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2024, 03:59 PM   #16
Andy0331
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: FL
Posts: 437
Quote:
Originally Posted by isgrb View Post
I know the Offshore is the ‘entry-level’ AP but I’m actually quite fond of them.
As noted in another post; they really aren't, beyond the current level of popularity. Pre-"watch hype" period of 2020, the ROO's were generally in higher demand and the RO's were cheaper in the secondary market.

I'm sure the pendulum will swing back again at some point, in the meantime, buy what feels best to you.
Andy0331 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2024, 06:28 PM   #17
Gandor
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2022
Location: USA
Posts: 278
Everyone's talking about how hard the crown is to operate on the ROO diver, but I really haven't had that issue. The case is thick enough that you can operate the crown while the watch is on the wrist very easily which covers all my above water timing needs. Below water you would set the timer before you go under anyways. If you're doing something that requires multiple adjustments underwater you're going to be wearing a dive computer.
__________________
15510ST Green | 15720ST Gray | 26393QT Taupe | 116400GV | 126234 Mint
Gandor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2024, 06:32 PM   #18
ikincooper
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Niki
Location: UK
Watch: Too many
Posts: 814
Offshore - Diver or Chronograph?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gandor View Post
Everyone's talking about how hard the crown is to operate on the ROO diver, but I really haven't had that issue. The case is thick enough that you can operate the crown while the watch is on the wrist very easily which covers all my above water timing needs. Below water you would set the timer before you go under anyways. If you're doing something that requires multiple adjustments underwater you're going to be wearing a dive computer.

My comments about the dive crown being hard to operate are in comparison to either a chronograph or a typical manually rotatable dive bezel. Don’t get me wrong, I love me 15720ST (grey, same as yours according to your signature ).

OP, would not be fair to say that you’re leaning towards the chrono now?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ikincooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2024, 09:51 PM   #19
hussain
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: -
Posts: 108
I have both and I can say the 43mm is much nicer and wears better, ceramic bezel is also an advantage.
__________________
Audemars Piguet: 15400st (White), 26470st (Batman), 15720st (Blue), 26240or (Blue), 26420so (Taupe), 26331st (Blue), Rolex: 116710LN (Black), 126710BLRO (Pepsi), 126610LV (Starbucks), Vacheron Constantin: 4500v (Blue), Omega: Seamaster professional 300m (Green), Speedmaster Sapphire Sandwich
hussain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2024, 05:16 AM   #20
isgrb
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 122
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikincooper View Post
My comments about the dive crown being hard to operate are in comparison to either a chronograph or a typical manually rotatable dive bezel. Don’t get me wrong, I love me 15720ST (grey, same as yours according to your signature ).

OP, would not be fair to say that you’re leaning towards the chrono now?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That would be fair to say, yes. This discussion has been extremely helpful for sure
isgrb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2024, 06:36 AM   #21
In-N-Out
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: USA
Posts: 856


Love my Diver! Was my daily for over 1 year even after I got my first RO. Haven’t worn it lately but will soon. Perfect travel watch imo since it doesn’t attract as much attention as a RO. Khaki dial looks better than the green aquanauts imo, but I’m heavily biased.
In-N-Out is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2024, 07:51 AM   #22
GW44
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Gareth
Location: Surrey, UK
Watch: AP/Rolex
Posts: 2,255
Icon10

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivalas View Post
Always preferred the chrono’s myself.

No way you took that picture Stephen

Was it your butler from the east wing?
GW44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2024, 08:07 AM   #23
Uros
"TRF" Member
 
Uros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Europe
Posts: 428
Quote:
Originally Posted by ts3 View Post
I'd get a preowned ceramic diver 15707CE and I'll never own a watch with a 4:30 date.

Have problem with 4::30 date as well:):)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Uros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2024, 09:59 AM   #24
Gandalf
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: N/A
Posts: 6
I went through the same decision process earlier this year. I chose the 43mm chrono and couldn't be happier.
Gandalf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 September 2024, 12:25 AM   #25
Vivalas
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Stephen
Location: UK
Watch: AP
Posts: 2,643
Quote:
Originally Posted by GW44 View Post
No way you took that picture Stephen

Was it your butler from the east wing?
I can’t recall big G, I remember talking to one of my ‘people’ and telling them to get one of their ‘people’ on it
Vivalas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 September 2024, 12:31 AM   #26
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,407
Prefer The diver over the Chrono, it is a very cool watch.
It has a simple movement vs a stacked movement on the Chrono so it’s a bit thinner.

Having owned the steel diver previously I learned two things,

an AP steel bezel is not for the faint of heart. It will ding and scratch quickly in regular use. You have to be ok with living with it.

Second thing is while the timing ring is superior because it cannot be accidentally altered, it is a pia to set and resulted in infrequent use compared to a typical diving bezel.
__________________
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 September 2024, 09:21 AM   #27
matthew P
"TRF" Member
 
matthew P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by subtona View Post
Prefer The diver over the Chrono, it is a very cool watch.
It has a simple movement vs a stacked movement on the Chrono so it’s a bit thinner.

Having owned the steel diver previously I learned two things,

an AP steel bezel is not for the faint of heart. It will ding and scratch quickly in regular use. You have to be ok with living with it.

Second thing is while the timing ring is superior because it cannot be accidentally altered, it is a pia to set and resulted in infrequent use compared to a typical diving bezel.

As a fan of the diver I’m happy to read your owner feedback


..Explorer, Spring Diver & APRO..
matthew P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 September 2024, 11:55 PM   #28
Giggsy11
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: HK
Watch: AP Rolex PP
Posts: 123
Prefer the simplistic look of the diver…
Giggsy11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.