![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 122
|
Offshore - Diver or Chronograph?
I know the Offshore is the ‘entry-level’ AP but I’m actually quite fond of them.
That said, I can’t make up my mind between the latest gen diver (15720) or chronograph (26420), this would be my first AP. Ignoring color-ways and steel vs. TI etc., which model do you prefer and why? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Niki
Location: UK
Watch: Too many
Posts: 778
|
I think both options are great and I certainly love my diver.
The above said, using the timing bezel on it is a PITA so if you’re planning to use this function, I’d suggest the chronograph. The other plus for the chronographs are that the vast majority have ceramic bezels which will not show love marks the same as the steel divers. All threads need photos, so here one to get things going and to help you decide which reference you prefer most. ![]() All the best, Niki Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Asia
Posts: 228
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Arizona
Posts: 888
|
I had and sold the diver. I really regret selling that thing.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,387
|
I'd get a preowned ceramic diver 15707CE and I'll never own a watch with a 4:30 date.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 2,102
|
Offshore - Diver or Chronograph?
I have both and prefer the 43. Can’t explain it, I just love it.
There’s nothing wrong with the diver. ![]() ![]() Maybe consider the 43 without the chrono. I saw one and it’s really sweet. Might be the right compromise if you’re torn. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: SFO
Posts: 1,194
|
Chrono by a mile but potentially biased since I have one.
New 43mm wears like a charm. Chrono function is actually useful (at least more so than a diver). No awkward dial crown like the diver that sticks out like a sore thumb. IMO also better / more interesting dial layout and colors (esp the taupe version) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: SFO
Posts: 1,194
|
Quote:
Last comment I'd make in favor of the ROO Chronos : plenty of them either have Ceramic bezels or rubber bezel (for non-chrono) which gives me a bit more piece of mind |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Aspen
Posts: 819
|
If buying today...I would also say the 43mm. If AP redesigned the diver...they could have a big hit on their hands. IMHO...they just need to:
1. sink the case back like the 43 and curve the bezel/crystal like the 43 2. shave 2mm of thickness off 3. redesign the hour hand 4. release more with ceramic bezels |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,818
|
Quote:
@OP - I’d vote for the chrono - a bit more interesting and aesthetically pleasing IMO. But I do quite like the khaki green diver.
__________________
AP 15500ST (Silver) // ♛ Rolex 126334 (Blue Roman, Fluted, Jubilee) // Ω Moonswatch (Mission to Pluto) // G-Shock GA2100-1A1 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 122
|
Excellent feedback so far, thanks all.
I must admit the biggest drawback to the diver (in my eyes) is the crown at 10 o’clock. I don’t mind the steel bezel and I like the fact that it’s more robust than the chrono but that is definitely the biggest drawback for me. The chronograph dial is busier for sure but looks a bit more refined. Of course it’s bigger than the diver too but I’m attracted to the curvature of the crystal and bezel. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Niki
Location: UK
Watch: Too many
Posts: 778
|
Just to add, strangely I visually like the 10 o clock crown on the diver as it’s fairly unique. It’s just totally impractical to use when on the wrist! Having a ceramic bezel on the diver would be
![]() Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Stephen
Location: UK
Watch: AP
Posts: 2,626
|
Always preferred the chrono’s myself.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Earth
Posts: 105
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Aspen
Posts: 819
|
I am not sure the dual crown on any of the internal bezel watches are practical to actually use. It is sort of the ROO Diver’s calling card and doubt we will ever see that change. IMHO
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: FL
Posts: 435
|
Quote:
I'm sure the pendulum will swing back again at some point, in the meantime, buy what feels best to you. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2022
Location: USA
Posts: 254
|
Everyone's talking about how hard the crown is to operate on the ROO diver, but I really haven't had that issue. The case is thick enough that you can operate the crown while the watch is on the wrist very easily which covers all my above water timing needs. Below water you would set the timer before you go under anyways. If you're doing something that requires multiple adjustments underwater you're going to be wearing a dive computer.
__________________
15510ST Green | 15720ST Gray | 26393QT Taupe | 116400GV | 126234 Mint |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Niki
Location: UK
Watch: Too many
Posts: 778
|
Offshore - Diver or Chronograph?
Quote:
My comments about the dive crown being hard to operate are in comparison to either a chronograph or a typical manually rotatable dive bezel. Don’t get me wrong, I love me 15720ST (grey, same as yours according to your signature ![]() OP, would not be fair to say that you’re leaning towards the chrono now? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: -
Posts: 108
|
I have both and I can say the 43mm is much nicer and wears better, ceramic bezel is also an advantage.
__________________
Audemars Piguet: 15400st (White), 26470st (Batman), 15720st (Blue), 26240or (Blue), 26420so (Taupe), 26331st (Blue), Rolex: 116710LN (Black), 126710BLRO (Pepsi), 126610LV (Starbucks), Vacheron Constantin: 4500v (Blue), Omega: Seamaster professional 300m (Green), Speedmaster Sapphire Sandwich |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 122
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: USA
Posts: 823
|
![]() Love my Diver! Was my daily for over 1 year even after I got my first RO. Haven’t worn it lately but will soon. Perfect travel watch imo since it doesn’t attract as much attention as a RO. Khaki dial looks better than the green aquanauts imo, but I’m heavily biased. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Gareth
Location: Surrey, UK
Watch: AP/Rolex
Posts: 2,227
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Europe
Posts: 414
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: N/A
Posts: 6
|
I went through the same decision process earlier this year. I chose the 43mm chrono and couldn't be happier.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Stephen
Location: UK
Watch: AP
Posts: 2,626
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,269
|
Prefer The diver over the Chrono, it is a very cool watch.
It has a simple movement vs a stacked movement on the Chrono so it’s a bit thinner. Having owned the steel diver previously I learned two things, an AP steel bezel is not for the faint of heart. It will ding and scratch quickly in regular use. You have to be ok with living with it. Second thing is while the timing ring is superior because it cannot be accidentally altered, it is a pia to set and resulted in infrequent use compared to a typical diving bezel.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 426
|
Quote:
As a fan of the diver I’m happy to read your owner feedback ..Explorer, Spring Diver & APRO.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: HK
Watch: AP Rolex PP
Posts: 121
|
Prefer the simplistic look of the diver…
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.