The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26 September 2024, 07:57 AM   #1
Lesnerelli23
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Michigan
Posts: 857
Brushing on Tudor

I’m not really a fan of the satin brushing look Tudor uses. I don’t hate it but I do like the Rolex brushing much more.

Has anyone brushed (or had it done) their Tudor? It’s something I’ve been considering but I’d really rather see it first if I could!

Mostly I’m looking for BB58 or heritage divers…


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Lesnerelli23 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2024, 05:14 PM   #2
OG1982
2024 Pledge Member
 
OG1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2020
Real Name: Ollie
Location: UK
Watch: Sub41 OP36 & DJ36
Posts: 1,928
Rolex uses a different grade of steel to Tudor, so you’re never likely to achieve the same finish.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
OG1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2024, 06:20 PM   #3
omar10213245
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Real Name: Omar
Location: somewhere
Watch: 126515LN (sundust)
Posts: 1,292
What dont you like about it?? Looks fine to me
omar10213245 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2024, 08:04 PM   #4
Bob-a-Job
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Location: UK
Posts: 37
Beauty is in the eye.........

The BB58 is slightly understated, much less showy and glossy etc; but you know this!

I love slapping my BB58 on my wrist, of course the dimensions help.

I don't compare the the brushing to my Rolex brushing though. We're all different eh?
Bob-a-Job is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2024, 08:59 PM   #5
Swearengen
"TRF" Member
 
Swearengen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Gabriel
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,858
That's interesting, can you expand on that? What is the spec of the steel Rolex and Tudor use?


Quote:
Originally Posted by OG1982 View Post
Rolex uses a different grade of steel to Tudor, so you’re never likely to achieve the same finish.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________

1680 1675 16800 16570 16710 17000 16613 17013

Gone but not forgotten 16610LV 1016
16234
Swearengen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2024, 09:30 PM   #6
eemour
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2024
Location: Suwanee, GA
Posts: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob-a-Job View Post
Beauty is in the eye.........

The BB58 is slightly understated, much less showy and glossy etc; but you know this!

I love slapping my BB58 on my wrist, of course the dimensions help.

I don't compare the the brushing to my Rolex brushing though. We're all different eh?
I agree that the BB58 doesn’t need to scream luxury to make an impression. It’s got that refined, low-key appeal, and the dimensions make it so comfortable to wear every day.
eemour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2024, 09:52 PM   #7
derekhayden
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Texas
Watch: Tudor BBGMT
Posts: 793
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swearengen View Post
That's interesting, can you expand on that? What is the spec of the steel Rolex and Tudor use?
Tudor uses 316L and Rolex uses 904L
__________________
********************************************
Official 2nd Member of The Poor Man's Rolex Club
********************************************
derekhayden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2024, 10:08 PM   #8
GBD
"TRF" Member
 
GBD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 442
I find the opposite - the satin finish Rolex uses is a bit one-note, while Tudor uses polish, satin, and coarser brushing on the case, and circular brushing on the lug tops. Basically Tudor brushes the cases in way Rolex used to, while Rolex brushing has become much more simple (and boring, imo).
GBD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2024, 10:28 PM   #9
cdmorenot
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
cdmorenot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Carlos.
Location: NNJ - MDE
Watch: = Want them all.
Posts: 3,678
I agree! I haven’t owned a Tudor in a long time but I wasn’t a fan of the brushing on my Black Bay. To me, it felt like the grain was a little too fine. It gave the surface a sheen that almost looked polished.I didn’t like it at all.

I took a scotchbright to the bracelet and liked it that much more. Ultimately got rid of it cause it was too thick but if I ever buy another Tudor I would likely send it out to Zimmerman and have them replicate the brush of a 5 digit such as the 16570 which is a little more coarse.
__________________
| Breguet | Cartier | Casio | Hublot | Omega | Oris | Rolex | Seiko |
cdmorenot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2024, 04:16 AM   #10
Lesnerelli23
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Michigan
Posts: 857
Couple things to digest from different comments.

I do realize it’s a different steel but even when Rolex used 316L the brushing had this look that I like better. So the alloy isn’t really a factor it seems.

Like I said, I don’t hate the Tudor finish, I just like Rolex version better and I believe it actually looks more rugged compared to Tudor’s soft appearance.

I too love the understatedness of the BB58. I own two of them. However, as I stated above, I find the Rolex brushing style to have a more rugged tool appearance. It’s heavier, the Tudor version is softer and more “elegant” I would say.

I was just looking at my blue BB58 next to my 116610 last night and had the thought that the Tudor might really benefit (in my opinion) from the heavier brushed look.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Lesnerelli23 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2024, 06:09 AM   #11
Poodlopogus
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Sesame Street
Posts: 141
I think other aesthetic aspects of the watches might also make the surface finishes appear more different than they really are.

The blockier cases on many Tudors (along with the large, matte crowns) are one part of it. Also, the less sleek bracelets (faux rivet ones) and less-than-perfect (by design, I would imagine) fit of the end links between the lugs gives the watches their charm, but also gives them a very different appearance.
Poodlopogus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2024, 10:05 AM   #12
Yachtbuoy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Australia
Watch: 1603 & 25407N
Posts: 351
Quote:
Originally Posted by GBD View Post
I find the opposite - the satin finish Rolex uses is a bit one-note, while Tudor uses polish, satin, and coarser brushing on the case, and circular brushing on the lug tops. Basically Tudor brushes the cases in way Rolex used to, while Rolex brushing has become much more simple (and boring, imo).
Looking at my old Datejust and my Pelagos 39/other Tudors I've held, I have to agree with this.
Yachtbuoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.