The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Ω Omega Discussion Forum
Reload this Page New FOIS released
Register FAQ Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Yesterday, 11:49 PM   #1
gnuyork
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 3,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by nachopc View Post
The patina is exaggerated, I like watches to age naturally not artificially. 321 is a completely different story.
Same trend with Tudor black bay, they make it looking vintage like old 16700-16710 Rolex but simply they are not, again patina exaggerated.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
What makes the 321 any different regarding your dislike of faux patina?
gnuyork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 12:54 AM   #2
nachopc
2024 Pledge Member
 
nachopc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Real Name: Nash
Location: Europe
Watch: Rolex Only
Posts: 1,553
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnuyork View Post
What makes the 321 any different regarding your dislike of faux patina?


Judge yourself


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
nachopc is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 5 (4 members and 1 guests)
ap1 , Trogster , teohk , Mach

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
 This space is provided to horological resources.



Contact Us - The Rolex Forums - Archive - Top


Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.