ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Does your 32xx movement seem to be 100% ok? | |||
Yes, no issues | 1,051 | 69.79% | |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) but timekeeping is still fine | 62 | 4.12% | |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) and timekeeping is off (>5 s/d) | 393 | 26.10% | |
Voters: 1506. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Yesterday, 11:54 PM | #5341 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,889
|
Quote:
Why should a movement deteriorate drastically after running to about 83% (58/70) of its power reserve? |
|
Today, 07:16 AM | #5342 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: UK
Posts: 25
|
Quote:
Maybe a gentle interrogation of the RSC when this Submariner is being picked from service will prove helpful. |
|
Today, 08:11 AM | #5343 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2024
Location: Paris
Posts: 5
|
|
Today, 08:53 AM | #5344 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The UK
Watch: I love them all.
Posts: 1,852
|
Quote:
Rolex don't like to give out too much information.
__________________
Regards, CharlesN Member of the IWJG. |
|
Today, 09:13 AM | #5345 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: PNW
Posts: 48
|
Quote:
For science's sake, I just tossed it on the 1900 and let it sit for 10 minutes. It is about +24 hours from when I put it down yesterday in drawer. Current DU reading is better but still far off my +24 test reading. -21 to -28 s/d, Amp 162, BE 4.9. Quote:
|
||
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 35 (2 members and 33 guests) | |
SmugCity , cascadez71 |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.