ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

1William · 13 October 2024, 11:46 PM

Cool watch. Before and now. I do like it on the NATO.

ratty · Yesterday, 12:47 AM

I’ve often thought about doing this to my 5 digit Sub date, but I’ve never thought about the position of the date window before.

I think your watch looks good, well done.

paul cbc · Yesterday, 02:00 AM

OP - watch looks great and well done!!
Glad it worked out without issues.

I personally like the Sea Dwelleresque, non-cyclops date.

Enjoy!

JMP57 · Yesterday, 04:15 AM

Very interesting that you would attempt this and glad it worked out for you, but the result is not for me.

bradyb · Yesterday, 06:28 AM

Alcohol-inspired madness. Bravo!

173rdabn · Yesterday, 07:38 AM

Looks quite good. Well done.

Carguy87 · Yesterday, 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevin of Larchmont

I really like the end result but I don’t have the stones to swing a hammer in the direction of my watch.

I second this lol. Looks cool but no chance I’d try it myself. Good for you!

dba · Yesterday, 09:38 AM

Nope.

garyk · Yesterday, 11:01 AM

If you still have this watch when you are a bit older, trust me you will miss that cyclops…

L_S_SHOE · Yesterday, 11:59 AM

Nope. Date now too small for the watch.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

SpeakWithMichael · Yesterday, 12:08 PM

My eyesight in the last two years has deteriorated to where the little numbers on a date window are too darn small. I miss having a cyclops and think I might actually need to make my way back to either a Rolex with cyclops or a no-date watch. Getting old(er) and all that.

Joemck · Yesterday, 12:22 PM

Not the content I was expecting with the caption- razor & a ball peen hammer!
Most decidedly, a lack of mayhem.
Nice job and a cool look��

RichM · Yesterday, 02:03 PM

Looks good.

SS Oyster · Yesterday, 02:08 PM

I like the cyclops. I’d hate to see what you’d get if selling it sans cyclops.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

1st amg · Yesterday, 09:26 PM

Wow, your brave...or nuts! Gus, that looks really good. But I do not have what it takes to attempt this......maybe on my brother's watch lol, but certainly not mine.

Yesterday, 09:38 AM	#38
dba 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: David Location: Gardnerville, NV Watch: 16710 Posts: 2,691	Nope. __________________ Current: 16710 Previous: 16760 Fat Lady, 16613 Bluesy, 16800, 14060, 16710 Pepsi, 216570 Polar, 116710LN, 16610, 216570 Polar (again), 16713, 216570 Polar (yet again), 16710 Black w/ Pepsi Insert Hope is not a strategy.

Yesterday, 11:01 AM	#39
garyk 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Gary Location: USA Watch: Daytona Posts: 11,587	If you still have this watch when you are a bit older, trust me you will miss that cyclops… __________________

Yesterday, 12:22 PM	#42
Joemck "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2015 Location: Boston Watch: And listen Posts: 690	Not the content I was expecting with the caption- razor & a ball peen hammer! Most decidedly, a lack of mayhem. Nice job and a cool look�� __________________ " Now and then we had a hope that if we lived and were good, God would permit us to become pirates." ---- Mark Twain

Yesterday, 02:03 PM	#43
RichM 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2015 Real Name: Richie Location: "Nowhere Man" Watch: out now,take care! Posts: 29,203	Looks good. __________________ "I love to work at nothing all day" TRF #139960

13 October 2024, 11:46 PM	#31
1William 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: North Carolina Watch: Rolex/Others Posts: 47,097	Cool watch. Before and now. I do like it on the NATO.

Yesterday, 12:47 AM	#32
ratty "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: Graham Location: UK Watch: Daytonas and Subs Posts: 2,773	I’ve often thought about doing this to my 5 digit Sub date, but I’ve never thought about the position of the date window before. I think your watch looks good, well done.

Yesterday, 02:00 AM	#33
paul cbc "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2017 Location: USA Posts: 283	OP - watch looks great and well done!! Glad it worked out without issues. I personally like the Sea Dwelleresque, non-cyclops date. Enjoy!

Yesterday, 04:15 AM	#34
JMP57 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2021 Location: Florida USA Posts: 69	Very interesting that you would attempt this and glad it worked out for you, but the result is not for me.

Yesterday, 06:28 AM	#35
bradyb "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: Brady Location: Austin, TX Watch: GMT Posts: 967	Alcohol-inspired madness. Bravo!

Yesterday, 07:38 AM	#36
173rdabn 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Real Name: George Location: Cape Cod Watch: 216570 Explorer II Posts: 2,392	Looks quite good. Well done.

Yesterday, 11:59 AM	#40
L_S_SHOE "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2019 Location: Tennessee, USA Watch: 16800 Posts: 560	Nope. Date now too small for the watch. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yesterday, 12:08 PM	#41
SpeakWithMichael "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2017 Location: Jacksonville, FL Watch: Superocean 44not42 Posts: 1,703	My eyesight in the last two years has deteriorated to where the little numbers on a date window are too darn small. I miss having a cyclops and think I might actually need to make my way back to either a Rolex with cyclops or a no-date watch. Getting old(er) and all that.

Yesterday, 02:08 PM	#44
SS Oyster 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: USA Posts: 9,098	I like the cyclops. I’d hate to see what you’d get if selling it sans cyclops. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yesterday, 09:26 PM	#45
1st amg 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: nicholas Location: ottawa canada Watch: Rolex,AP,Panerai Posts: 10,160	Wow, your brave...or nuts! Gus, that looks really good. But I do not have what it takes to attempt this......maybe on my brother's watch lol, but certainly not mine.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)