Sub 41 vs GMT lug-to-lug dif.

[sls70]

Hi everyone,
I currently own a sub 41 LV and I feel that it wears much larger vs. the GMT BLNR. Except from the diameter, do you know what is their lug-to-lug difference?
Thanks

[SLWoodster]

optical illusion or proportions of other things on the watch. I do know bracelet is 1mm wider on 41mm Sub

Sub 126610 - 47.6mm

GMT 126710 - 48mm

I have both, they wear similar to me. Visually, i find the BLNR to be larger. I think it's because of bezel font.

Originally Posted by sls70

Hi everyone,
I currently own a sub 41 LV and I feel that it wears much larger vs. the GMT BLNR. Except from the diameter, do you know what is their lug-to-lug difference?
Thanks

[brandrea]

I own both. Any measurements from lug to lug or wherever will vary depending on who operates the calipers

In real world wear I think the 124060 wears slightly larger than the 126710. Perhaps because of the caseback profile and it is slightly larger in diameter YMMV

[Krash]

I feel like my Sub wears slightly larger than my GMT mostly because of the Oyster vs Jubilee bracelet. My DJ41 wears smaller than both.

But the biggest difference comes from my Seamaster. That wears noticeably larger than all the above.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[MichelleP]

I have a BLRO and have had the Sub 41. I felt the Sub wore larger on my smaller wrist.