TS's Take on the Cubitus Release

[eanzenberg]

������

I’m just glad there are brands like Journe, ALS, even AP continuing to push the envelope.

[nickorette]

Originally Posted by Champagnepapi

Interestingly, Thierry emphasized that he doesn’t work with external designers because it never works—yet, history shows that his father, Mr. Philippe Stern, did just that. For example, Gerald Genta, a renowned freelance designer, is the one who actually designed the NAUTILUS, not Patek Philippe themselves. Genta collaborated with Patek, though he was never directly employed by the company.

When the Aquanaut was released in 1997, Philippe Stern was in charge, and while Thierry was part of the team, he wasn’t leading the project. So basically it’s not his own accomplishment, legacy or design.

It makes me wonder if Thierry isn’t entirely comfortable with the fact that the Nautilus wasn’t designed in-house. This new release feels like an attempt to replicate the success of the Nautilus, perhaps to shift credit away from Genta by mimicking key elements like the bracelet and dial pattern, while subtly claiming it as his own original design. Instead of an evolution, it feels more like an effort to redefine the past by forcing a design onto collectors under the guise of innovation (maybe a round movement in a square 45mm L2L is innovative?).

These are just my thoughts, but this doesn’t seem like a genuine progression for Patek. Rather, it comes across as an attempt to discredit Genta’s original design. Honestly, I believe that if Thierry could cancel the Nautilus line from Patek’s catalog completely—he would. But of course, that’s not possible and would severely hurt the brand. Instead, I suspect he will phase out the remaining stainless steel models, leaving the Nautilus available only in precious metals, as they’re more profitable. This would also help boost sales of his new own designed CUBITUS lineup (because, really, who would currently choose a Cubitus over a Nautilus if given the choice?).

Or maybe I’m just overthinking it… anyways I just wanted to share my thoughts - it’s late already, gotta get some coffee and head out to see if I can buy one or two. P.S. I LOVE THE CUBITUS NO CAP.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Genta was also responsible for Ellipse design as well..

[Champagnepapi]

Originally Posted by nickorette

Genta was also responsible for Ellipse design as well..

Interesting… I thought Ellipse was designed by Jean-Daniel Rubel (Head of the R&D department) at Patek Philippe at the time around 1966.
Nevertheless, Happy to learn new things here everyday! Cheers


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[nickorette]

Originally Posted by Champagnepapi

Interesting… I thought Ellipse was designed by Jean-Daniel Rubel (Head of the R&D department) at Patek Philippe at the time around 1966.
Nevertheless, Happy to learn new things here everyday! Cheers


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I stand corrected! It does appear to be a common misconception, I guess I must've heard it somewhere

[yoast]

Originally Posted by Champagnepapi

Interestingly, Thierry emphasized that he doesn’t work with external designers because it never works—yet, history shows that his father, Mr. Philippe Stern, did just that. For example, Gerald Genta, a renowned freelance designer, is the one who actually designed the NAUTILUS, not Patek Philippe themselves. Genta collaborated with Patek, though he was never directly employed by the company.

When the Aquanaut was released in 1997, Philippe Stern was in charge, and while Thierry was part of the team, he wasn’t leading the project. So basically it’s not his own accomplishment, legacy or design.

Interestingly the Aquanaut was designed by Laurent Ferrier when he was still employed at Patek

[pam66]

TS totally full of himself. inspite of the fact that the cubits shows that he didn't even attend university to study design. sort of a self-made home-taught design ignorant.

[enthusiast]

Originally Posted by pam66

TS totally full of himself. inspite of the fact that the cubits shows that he didn't even attend university to study design. sort of a self-made home-taught design ignorant.

What makes this disturbing interview so much worse is its implications.

It clearly demonstrates how this company is actually run.

[Partekular]

Originally Posted by pam66

TS totally full of himself. inspite of the fact that the cubits shows that he didn't even attend university to study design. sort of a self-made home-taught design ignorant.

There’s nothing wrong with being self-taught. It beats going to a design/art/ architecture school/uni and leaving like a sausage with a few added herbs.

On the other hand the Cubitus is a pastiche Nautilus BUT with the added technical brilliance of the horologists who designed and improved the mechanism. If my wrists fatten up and I ever get to buy one it will be primarily for its guts.

[ts3]

Originally Posted by nyc2la

It seems to me it’s exactly the opposite to what TS is quoted saying.

The haters are mostly people who have owned (and currently own) a Patek.

It is those who haven’t owned, but who have wanted to own, a Patek who seem to like it.

Go figure.

Agree, many of those who want one appear to be fairly new in their interest for the brand, like a few years in max. TS is probably just fine with that though.

[SpeedyTuomas]

Originally Posted by dauster

Nope I am German and it reads exactly the same for me :)

Really? Seems like a stupid and arrogant thing to say. And incorrect.

" The haters are mostly people who have never had a Patek and never will"

[codecow]

Originally Posted by ts3

Agree, many of those who want one appear to be fairly new in their interest for the brand, like a few years in max. TS is probably just fine with that though.

Clearly since they have been killing ADs we decades long relationships.

[Shadow Play]

I’m sorry but, to me at least, that is a completely classless statement for TS to say “the haters are mostly people who have never had a Patek and never will. So that doesn’t bother me”. I also find the statement somewhat arrogant. If he believed it was such a great and well thought out watch, may I humbly suggest he would have been better served explaining why he felt the new watch was so good.

Being classless and arrogant are not something I associate with owners of Patek. Quite the opposite actually. Confident and understated would be better descriptions. TS should surely be aware that such comments by a person in his position has the potential to damage brand perception.