ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
21 October 2024, 10:18 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 444
|
Rolex 1680 - Accuracy
Hi all,
Have purchased a recently serviced 1680. Was over the moon with the watch until I noticed it runs 4 sec slow per day when left on the table facing up. And 12 sec fast per day when on the wrist. Is this normal for a 1680? Thank you. |
21 October 2024, 10:57 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,214
|
You really can't generalize about an entire reference for a 50+ year old watch. It depends so much on the condition of the movement, how it was maintained, and how thoroughly it was serviced/repaired/regulated. If you want it to keep better time, it might be possible, but you will need to find a watchmaker that is really willing to inspect every bit of the movement with a microscope, and repair/replace as necessary. It could cost more than you want to spend. Most vintage watch enthusiasts really don't care that much.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
21 October 2024, 02:27 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Uk
Watch: RolexGMT/Tudor7928
Posts: 4,038
|
Sounds like you have a really nice watch and the fact it’s running off slightly for me is nothing to be concerned about. After all it’s a vintage watch and being concerned with it being slow by 4 seconds or fast by 12 is a little over the top. Enjoy it for what it is
|
21 October 2024, 02:28 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 444
|
Ahhh makes sense.
I was under the impression the cal 1575 was a robust workhorse and with it being serviced, it should fall in range of cosc. Watch is still under warranty - would it be unreasonable to ask for it to regulated? Or just leave it as that is how the vintage watches work (sorry it's my first vintage watch and I have no idea). |
21 October 2024, 07:17 PM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Uk
Watch: RolexGMT/Tudor7928
Posts: 4,038
|
Quote:
|
|
21 October 2024, 08:30 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Francesco
Location: Italy
Posts: 113
|
Like car engines,even the movements need an overhaul..
If an engine runs out of oil, it breaks ! Same thing with a movement, especially if we use it every day...;) |
21 October 2024, 08:37 PM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Pete
Location: Base Camp
Posts: 624
|
My red sub from 1970 runs beautifully. +2secs per day.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Take care Pete |
21 October 2024, 08:45 PM | #8 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,748
|
I'd have a watchmaker put it on a timegrapher for a quick look at the secs/day in a couple of positions as well as the amplitude and beat error. He'll tell you if it needs a service from those numbers. Otherwise just buy one on Amazon for $120 and watch a few relevant vids on YouTube.
__________________
_______________________ |
21 October 2024, 08:49 PM | #9 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 77,299
|
Do you have any service information on the watch?
Adam’s advice is the route I’d go. Well honestly, I’d just take it in to a watchmaker to have it tested and skip the timeographer |
21 October 2024, 09:12 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Australia
Watch: 1603 & 25407N
Posts: 349
|
My '77 1603 runs within the +2/-2 spec
|
21 October 2024, 09:24 PM | #11 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 41,777
|
The movement's performance reflects a lot of things - some mechanical, some environmental.
Presuming it was properly serviced, the different results show how it handles the various different positions while on your wrist. A final thought, sometimes a watchmaker reuses a part that needs replacing. S/he won't know until an owner returns it due to imprecise performance. A pivot jewel perhaps had been damaged due to an earlier owner's failure to service the watch over the decades - maybe going without lube for years - and thus the decent performance in static mode, but poorer performance IRL action. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
21 October 2024, 09:25 PM | #12 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2023
Real Name: John Robison
Location: Massachusetts, US
Watch: Blue dial sub
Posts: 69
|
In the late 1970s I was starting my career as an engineer, and I bought one of those watches new. At the time, I had a Seiko quartz watch that I’d gotten to replace a broken Timex. The Seiko had impressed me with its incredible accuracy - remember, in 1975, quartz watches were still a novelty.
All the while, I knew the reputation of Rolex. One thing I also knew was that I’d be giving up the accuracy of the Seiko for the opportunity to wear such a prestigious watch. I took for granted accuracy of 1-2 minutes a day from inexpensive Timex and Bulova watches, and I knew the Rolex would be a lot better, but I didn’t know how much better till I bought my first one. In those days every Rolex watch came with a timing certificate showing the test results for that particular watch, and mine was 4-6 seconds a day in the various positions. Today, you ask if 4-12 seconds a day is ok, but back then that was very impressive. At the Rolex dealer, some watches were chronometers and met the 6 second standard, and others were not. When I got married, I got my wife a Date model, which was not a chronometer and was never better than 10-15 seconds a day. Most of the guys at work still had mechanical watches when I got that Rolex. We had all been impressed with the accuracy of quartz watches, but as engineers, we understood the principles of operation and knew any quartz oscillator would deliver very good accuracy compared to a mechanical movement. That made the accuracy of my new Rolex that much more amazing. Several of us knew the phone number of the National Bureau of Standards in Ft.Collins, Colorado by heart. That was the standard to set you watch to, if you were finicky. 303-499-7111. That number still works today, and I still call it. Within a few years, that Rolex drifted to 10-12 seconds a day and I had to get it regulated. But many people just wore them like that, because in that day, that was still very good time keeping. Now it’s 50 years later. When those watches were new, it was just a matter of setting them to achieve that accuracy. In your case, there may be worn parts to replace, and that opens another door - is the place that serviced it qualified to identify and change such parts? Not all jewelers who service these watches are. If you sent that watch to Rolex, I believe they can now return it to you with the modern accuracy of +/- 2 seconds a day, but it may cost $1500 for the work to get it there. If some other person did the work, they may or may not have the ability to achieve that, warranty notwithstanding. In my experience, the accuracy you see it pretty typical for movements of that period. |
21 October 2024, 10:14 PM | #13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,214
|
Just to add slightly to this. The radio transmitter broadcasting the time is in fact near Fort Collins, but the only thing in Fort Collins is a broadcast station. The atomic clock itself is of course at the NBS (now NIST) lab in Boulder. We don't like to give Fort Collins any credit if we can avoid it. :-)
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
22 October 2024, 04:41 AM | #14 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sweden
Watch: 1680
Posts: 1,869
|
Quote:
My -78 1680 currently runs at +20s/month. I usually wear it a couple of months after a service and then I go back to have it tightly regulated and telling them how it runs with my wearing habits. |
|
22 October 2024, 04:43 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: EARTH
Watch: What is "watch"?
Posts: 1,244
|
If it was recently serviced, it just needs a regulation. Like the post above. Have it regulated. You'll get +/- 2s/day no problem with the right regulation.
__________________
“UNpolished or I’m not interested” 😎 2FA Enabled |
23 October 2024, 09:44 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 444
|
Thank you all for your input.
I called the shop and was advised to bring in the watch for the watch maker to regulate. Was advised by the shop owner that the watch should run -4 and +6 seconds per day. |
23 October 2024, 11:35 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,903
|
Rolex 1680 - Accuracy
The Rolex after-sales rate tolerance document specifies an average rate of -1 / +10 s/d for the 1575. Rolex measures the caliber in 5 positions with a professional timegrapher.
|
24 October 2024, 06:22 AM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 197
|
Quote:
|
|
24 October 2024, 08:11 AM | #19 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,214
|
Quote:
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
|
24 October 2024, 03:05 PM | #20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,903
|
Quote:
The caliber 1575 (inside the 1680) is a certified chronometer COSC (Contrôle Officiel Suisse des Chronomètres) movement. |
|
27 October 2024, 01:19 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2022
Real Name: Hector
Location: San Antonio
Watch: Omega Speedmaster
Posts: 1
|
I thought the old standard was between -4 and +6 seconds/day; and the newer standard was -2/+2, or at least that’s what I recall reading.
|
27 October 2024, 01:23 AM | #22 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,296
|
These watches aren't certified chronometers for life. Parts slowly wear down and need replacement and unless one replaces all the movement parts necessary to have a "like new" movement with chronometer accuracy, one should not expect it - but, some vintage watches do keep fairly accurate time and within Rolex chronometer specifications.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
27 October 2024, 02:06 AM | #23 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,214
|
Quote:
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.