The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Yesterday, 12:12 AM   #31
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 77,561
Quote:
Originally Posted by Giangos View Post
I was offered one today. I don’t know ….. cool to have but not wearable at all.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It’s a very cool watch to own, but I agree with your comments about wearability.

If I was a fanatical collector of Rolex divers I’d probably want to own one, but my Submariner is good enough
brandrea is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 06:07 AM   #32
Giangos
"TRF" Member
 
Giangos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: John
Location: Australia
Watch: WG BLRO, Sub C, WG
Posts: 1,640
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandrea View Post
It’s a very cool watch to own, but I agree with your comments about wearability.

If I was a fanatical collector of Rolex divers I’d probably want to own one, but my Submariner is good enough

I agree, it’s for the collector that has basically everything and only the whacky stuff interest him now


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Giangos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 10:21 AM   #33
HiDive
"TRF" Member
 
HiDive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Vincent
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Watch: Rolex Seadweller50
Posts: 412
Why make them

Quote:
Originally Posted by EverCloserUnion View Post
I'm still struggling to understand why Rolex made a watch that can function at a depth that would squash the wearer to the size and shape of a pancake.
I have been asking that question ever since I really got interested in watches in the 1970's. Technically speaking you would not be crushed by pressure at that depth, you just die from improper partial pressure of your breathing mix or possibly HPNS. No person has ever been diving below approximately 1600 fsw, and they likely never will. So watches with depth ratings deeper than around 2000 feet are 100% fluff and bragging rights. That being said, my newest watch is the James Cameron version of the Rolex Deepsea, which I will never take deeper than around 100 feet.



I would not say that the Rolex Deepsea is unwearable due to it's size though. At 50mm is is a full 3mm smaller that this Citizen which I own and wear on a fairly regular basis.

HiDive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 10:40 AM   #34
rolph
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: united states
Posts: 63
You might not be able to buy it at the original price immediately.
rolph is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.