ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
Yesterday, 11:37 AM | #1 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Jordan
Location: Proxima b
Posts: 1,091
|
ALS 1815 Chrono vs Patek 5960g
Alright, I’m going to do one of those dreaded this-or-that threads. I’m really hung up on the decision of which to choose. One of these two will be my next watch. I just can’t decide.
On one hand, the ALS 1815 chrono is one of the pinnacle manual chronographs. It’s stunning. Then you flip it over and holy sh*t the most visually brilliant movement on the market. Add to that, I’m a HUGE manual wound chrono fan. I currently own the PP 5170g (white dial), Omega 321 Speedy, and feel the 1815 chrono would be a great addition to round the trifecta. I’m looking at the black dial version to complement the white dial of my 5170. Then there’s the PP 5960g. It’s Patek’s first in-house automatic chrono with annual calendar. It’s more sporty, I no longer wear a suit so all my watches end up on more casual straps, so I feel like I can play with straps more. I’ve never owned an annual calendar, so that’s missing in my collection (however I change out watches often so would need it on the winder). And it’s more limited only being released in 2017, from my understanding (the blue dial version specifically). I’m also a huge PP fan, although I’ve never owned an ALS. So there’s my dilemma, which to get. Yes it would be great to own both, but not happening (for now). I don’t have the ability to see either in person, so I would love to hear owners opinions on either, and just have fun hearing which one other members would choose. Photos of each I borrowed from the web: |
Yesterday, 12:43 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,966
|
Between those two, ALS x 1,000,000
|
Yesterday, 12:55 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 8,615
|
Lange; you laid out the reasons well.
__________________
---------------------- Instagram: watchesandchickensandwiches |
Yesterday, 01:05 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: HK
Posts: 2,284
|
ALS in this case but I would take a 5070 over both
|
Yesterday, 01:41 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: California
Posts: 73
|
I’m a huge Patek chrono fan, but hands down the 1815 over the 5960G
|
Yesterday, 01:59 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2023
Real Name: Eaton B.
Location: California
Watch: n+1
Posts: 168
|
For this matchup, ALS is no brainer, and twice on Sunday. if it was vs 5172, much tougher choice
|
Yesterday, 02:52 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 263
|
ALS. Hands down!
__________________
Lange Lange 1 ref. 191.021 | Audemars Piguet Royal Oak ref. 15500 | Breguet Classique ref. 5177BB | Glashütte Original Panoreserve | Breitling Navitimer 01 Limited Edition |
Yesterday, 03:06 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Florida
Watch: All of them
Posts: 753
|
Yeah I have to say I love both watches but especially in that gold with black dial configuration 100X the ALS
|
Yesterday, 03:28 PM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: marc
Location: nyc
Posts: 1,362
|
gotta go ALS here.
|
Yesterday, 04:29 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Asia
Posts: 843
|
1815 easily. I have some of the same/similar watches as you and I also never wear suits.
|
Yesterday, 05:07 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Europe
Posts: 719
|
1815. I had a 5960G that I recently traded up for a 5172. Mainly for two reasons: 1. the 5960G case is thick and a little uninspired 2. While a nice combination of functions, nothing beats a manual chrono or a perpetual calendar. The 5960 is neither and that started bugging me. I also looked at the black 1815 and the only reason I did not go for it was that I couldn’t find one near me to try on.
|
Yesterday, 08:40 PM | #12 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Santa Fe
Posts: 1,894
|
Thanks for making the choice such an easy one: Lange 1815.
|
Yesterday, 09:53 PM | #13 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,720
|
1815
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711. |
Yesterday, 10:23 PM | #14 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Jordan
Location: Proxima b
Posts: 1,091
|
Wow the ALS is overwhelmingly winning. Confirms what my heart has been trying to tell me.
It’s funny, I haven’t looked at pics of both of them together until I made this thread. Now looking at the pictures together the ALS really stands out as such a beautiful piece. |
Yesterday, 10:25 PM | #15 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Jordan
Location: Proxima b
Posts: 1,091
|
|
Yesterday, 10:30 PM | #16 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Jordan
Location: Proxima b
Posts: 1,091
|
Quote:
Thanks for this insight. The case thickness of the 5960 was my biggest hangup. When dealing with this level of Horology I really expect, and appreciate, a slim case. Granted there’s a bunch packed in there but anything over 12mm gives me pause. And I agree, nothing beats a manual chronograph! My 5170 cemented my love and obsession for manual chronos |
|
Yesterday, 10:34 PM | #17 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,472
|
ALS hands down.
|
Yesterday, 10:55 PM | #18 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,278
|
ALS for sure but man you’ve reminded me that dial combo is excellent on the patek. A classic look paired with that brown strap.
__________________
|
Today, 12:01 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: David
Location: NOVA
Posts: 553
|
ALS all day. If you had said 5070 then maybe a different discussion
|
Today, 12:37 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,489
|
ALS for me too.
Not a fan of the triple cutout AC with the left and right windows having different fonts and widths and at 13.5mm the 5960 is too thick for me anyway. But I'd love for Patek to make a 5960 style chrono w/o AC at 11-12mm thick (no date or simple date). Sure, there is the 5968 but that is awfully large and the 5975 is even thinner but lacks the chrono counter. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 4 (3 members and 1 guests) | |
ts3 , PT_91 , JPBlackBay |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.