![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 92
|
I think I am in the minority on the new subs
I do not yet have a rolex, but, soon will. THe only models I have ever been interested in are the subs and exp's. I think the rest of the collection is a bit dainty for my tastes. Anyhoo.......... I am very partial to the current 16610. I do not like the maxi dial or case one bit and I dislike the LV even more.
Which do you prefer just based on aesthetics? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Frédéric
Location: Belgium
Posts: 38
|
So do I. Exept I also like the GMT Master model, but my target is the Submariner 16610. Beside these models, I am not crazy about Rolex, but it is a matter of taste...
Now, to be honest, with the Internet pictures I don't see the difference between the 16610 and the 116610, exept with the close up on the besel ingraved with "rolexrolexrolex". Aniway, I'll probably choose a "used" one. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Steve
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: 16710 LN
Posts: 61
|
The explorer II since it has a 24 hour bezel. The GMT II is nice as well, but with the PCL's, I agree it is a bit "dainty". I have no use for a rotating bezel, so the sub is out.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Tough call... the 16610 is a bona fide design classic, but I like the updates as well as the greater heft. Can't go wrong if you get what you like best
![]() Cheers ![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Richard
Location: LV, NV
Watch: LV Sub and others
Posts: 2,689
|
The Sub family has a little for each taste. The old Sea Dweller was perfect. The Sub no date is old school tradition. The LV Sub is cool (if your into green) I love the ability to switch the bezel to black on the LV. The standard Sub, nice The Rolex classic. TT Sub blue or black for dress and for those who love the TT look. You can't go wrong with a Sub pick what you like and post photos as well, good luck.
![]()
__________________
Always working...by choice ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Mike
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Rolex DJ II.
Posts: 56
|
Not to change your mind...but
The new, larger (41mm) Datejusts II are hardly dainty!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Jib
Location: SJ, California
Watch: sun dial
Posts: 8,189
|
I love all Rolexes that don't have PCLs
![]() Seriously, the only watch the PCLs look good on are the Milgausses IMHO. As for the Subs, the most comfortable for my wrist is still the 16610. I really am not looking forward to the new ceramic sub, but the discontinuance of the current sub line can only be good for my 16610. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
Aesthetics - Sub Date, Explorer 1, GMT II and Daytona...
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,342
|
I don't care for the block cases...
I would like to get my hands on a few of those Glidelock clasps though..... ![]()
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: Skunk Hollow, TX
Watch: Rolex 116613LN Sub
Posts: 2,198
|
14060 for me
I prefer the simplicity of the no date sub. It is the safest Rolex to wear on a daily basis. No bling. No one really notices it.
![]()
__________________
JJ ........... Still missing you bro. May you enjoy the eternal peace the almighty has blessed you with. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Lifetime TRF Patron
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Daren
Location: Austin
Watch: the road
Posts: 13,585
|
If by dainty you mean wears small, the explorer 2 because of the fixed bezel wears small. Especially compared to the 16610.
__________________
You either get it or you don't, if you have to ask, YOU DON'T!! ![]() I really hope that midget cop doesn't find me in Kokomo. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
Quote:
![]() ![]()
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing ![]() Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches ![]() PLEXI IS SEXY |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: australia
Posts: 8
|
Not really a fan of the maxi dial to be honest and the case just looks a bit weird for me. Still a good looking watch though, just wouldn't want to wear it over my older subs.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 92
|
I am in the process of trying to locate a 16610 and am having a bit of difficulty, I am attempting to buy new. One dealer in my area has 'hoarded' his few remaining 16610's....super annoying. Guess I will have to try BB as much as i prefer not to buy through them.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Dave
Location: Sydney
Watch: 118239
Posts: 413
|
16610 is a classic, can't go wrong
__________________
The world is safe again... but for how long? Current: TAG Heuer 2000 Classic, Kobold Phantom Tactical Chronograph, Rolex Submariner 16610, Breitling Superocean Heritage Chronograph A13320 (Crowe Edition), Rolex Day-Date 118239 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: Skunk Hollow, TX
Watch: Rolex 116613LN Sub
Posts: 2,198
|
Quote:
__________________
JJ ........... Still missing you bro. May you enjoy the eternal peace the almighty has blessed you with. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: Skunk Hollow, TX
Watch: Rolex 116613LN Sub
Posts: 2,198
|
Quote:
__________________
JJ ........... Still missing you bro. May you enjoy the eternal peace the almighty has blessed you with. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Ricky
Location: City of Sin
Watch: Hulk, DaytonaC, DJ
Posts: 1,149
|
I love the 16610. It is my first Rolex out of my three. The only thing I want on it is the green bezel. I don't like the maxi dial, it looks too busy and doesn't seem elegant. That's my $0.02.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: JYogi/Jeremy
Location: Metro Detroit USA
Watch: It's a Rolex!
Posts: 5,735
|
Quote:
X2 I have to agree 100%
__________________
"You won't rise to the occasion - you'll default to your level of training." Barrett Tillman Kentucky Colonel, Tennessee Squire & Combat Leprechaun |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,149
|
Well, having owned a Rolex with a new style clasp, I won't go back to the old style ones, and as such, the current 16610 doesn't interest me. Can't wait for the updated model
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Allen
Location: SC
Posts: 2,766
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Rick
Location: Michigan
Watch: for that TRF bug!!
Posts: 275
|
The new ones are nice...the old ones are nice....personal preference...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Karis
Location: USA
Posts: 19,377
|
Overall I prefer the 'old' style...can't go wrong with a 16610, or 16613, or 14060M, etc...
I do really like the new TT black Sub though...I think it's the white writing and datewheel that I prefer on this model over the 'old' style. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: massachusetts
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,691
|
I prefer the older style... though i prefer the old dial, i can live with the maxi dial on the new ones....
but the blocky cases ( as Tools referred to) , PCLs, and big lettering on the bezels look 1) not so refined to me and 2) are a little to "look at me". Less is more. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.