The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Classifieds > WatchOut!!!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 April 2010, 01:21 AM   #1
marie
"TRF" Member
 
marie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Antonio
Watch: UN Starry Night
Posts: 2,150
Married Scammer?: "going to visit my fiancée in Africa in a couple weeks..."

Note the wedding ring on his hand in the picture

I don't know if this watch is a problem, but it was funny enough to put it up here just in case. (The sizes of his pictures varied quite a bit-sorry)

http://cgi.ebay.com/Antique-OYSTERDA...item439e5be429

Hello friends, today I have up for auction an antique men’s Oysterdate Rolex, probably from the mid-70’s. It is from my grandfather’s estate, and he was always very meticulous about keeping his things clean, orderly and properly functioning. I got it a couple years ago, and had it serviced. I wore it for a couple months, and then decided I’d just keep it wound and then decided since I wasn’t wearing it, I didn’t need to keep it wound. Then I placed it in the box the service man gave it to me in and have kept it in an airtight fireproof safe since. I really hate to let this go, but I am going to visit my fiancée in Africa in a couple weeks, and there’s really no way I can afford to take the trip and miss work without parting with some of my valuables. If you have access to a Rolex catalogue and want to know the exact date this was manufactured, the serial number is 6694 827521. The service man wrote it down for me when he took off the band to clean it. PLEASE
__________________
marie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2010, 01:26 AM   #2
ChickoftheSea
"TRF" Member
 
ChickoftheSea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South Texas
Watch: YM 168623
Posts: 241
Oh my, what an idiot! You'd think the guy would think to remove his wedding ring before taking those photos.

I always think it's a red flag when "sellers" post too little information about the watch itself, or they WAY over-explain and in addition, LIE about why the watch is on the market. NO ONE CARES!!
ChickoftheSea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2010, 01:38 AM   #3
marie
"TRF" Member
 
marie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Antonio
Watch: UN Starry Night
Posts: 2,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChickoftheSea View Post
Oh my, what an idiot! You'd think the guy would think to remove his wedding ring before taking those photos.

I always think it's a red flag when "sellers" post too little information about the watch itself, or they WAY over-explain and in addition, LIE about why the watch is on the market. NO ONE CARES!!
I agree with both your points... but I thought it was funny too! Sad, pathetic and funny.
__________________
marie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2010, 01:46 AM   #4
TheBluePrince
"TRF" Member
 
TheBluePrince's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Posts: 2,081
Well i was going to say congratulations on your wedding but i see it's just another dodgy watch you've found
TheBluePrince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2010, 01:54 AM   #5
marie
"TRF" Member
 
marie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Antonio
Watch: UN Starry Night
Posts: 2,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBluePrince View Post
Well i was going to say congratulations on your wedding but i see it's just another dodgy watch you've found
__________________
marie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2010, 02:03 AM   #6
idk01
"TRF" Member
 
idk01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Dave
Location: Australia
Watch: DJ16233TT
Posts: 18,485
The watch looks good to me :-) serial dates it around 1952'ish, I have a feeling its a lack of knowledge on the sellers behalf, he did get it looked at and the model and serial are listed, seems to have good history, the ring is a bit of an oops :-)
__________________
Apprentice to Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth

idk01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2010, 02:04 AM   #7
marie
"TRF" Member
 
marie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Antonio
Watch: UN Starry Night
Posts: 2,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by idk01 View Post
The watch looks good to me :-) serial dates it around 1952'ish, I have a feeling its a lack of knowledge on the sellers behalf, he did get it looked at and the model and serial are listed, seems to have good history, the ring is a bit of an oops :-)
Wasn't sure...but the ring was enough of an oops to post jic.
__________________
marie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.