|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 May 2010, 08:47 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Geof
Location: minnisota
Watch: Rolex Datejust ii
Posts: 59
|
Roman numeral Question
so Since i got my Chrono-Cockpit i have pretty much been glued to it, and just realized that the (4) is marked as IIII rather than IV, i then did some looking and noticed that Rolex also markes their Roman numeral this way. Does anyone know the deal here or did I get trained wrong as is it supposed to be IIII
|
|
|
|
21 May 2010, 12:12 AM
|
#2 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Mark-O!
Location: Arlington, TX
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 12,714
|
There are a few theories on why it's done like that, but the one I believe in is that it makes the dial more symetrical. Also, if it was done as IV, then when you rotate the watch, it would look like a VI.
|
|
|
|
|
26 May 2010, 06:23 PM
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,878
|
The symetrical dial theory is what I have heard as well. Don't know if it is correct but sounds good.
Cheers |
|
|
|
|
26 May 2010, 06:23 PM
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,878
|
The symetrical dial theory is what I have heard as well. Don't know if it is correct but sounds good.
Cheers |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
