![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
|
sub-c clasp size
sub-c owners: do you find the clasp on the sub-c to be quite thick? i tried one on over the weekend and was surprised at how thick the clasp is, especially on the non-buckle side. wondering if the one i tried on was aberrant.
jj irani rest in peace |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
|
It's definitely thick, but not too thick. The GlideLock is a useful feature that IMHO worth such compromises.
![]() Clasp comparison between Sub-C and Breitling Colt II. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Great Britain
Watch: er, too many !!!
Posts: 86
|
It balances out quite nicely with the thickness of the case imo
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.