![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 273
|
Seamaster 300
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,302
|
Congrats
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,185
|
Congratulations, Jeremy!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 273
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Ohio,UnitedStates
Watch: ROLEX OMEGA
Posts: 1,458
|
Very nice, indeed! Congrats on your new Omega!
__________________
ROLEX & OMEGA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: UK
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 739
|
Congrats. The more I see it the more I like it.
__________________
Seiko RAF Gen 1 Chrono Black Bay Red Submariner 114060 Daytona 116520 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
TechXpert
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,564
|
Congrats!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 71,911
|
Looks great, how does it wear compared to the Sub? I assume that it's thicker?
Congrats. ![]()
__________________
Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 2 FA ENABLED
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 15
|
Looks great! Congrats
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 273
|
Quote:
Despite its thickness, the Omega seems smaller because of its thinner and more tapered lugs. It wears just as well, if not slightly better than the Sub. That's purely a personal opinion. Here are both watches for comparison: ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 499
|
Very nice indeed! Congrats!!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Phil
Location: CA
Posts: 5,374
|
congrats...one of the best in the Omega range...along with the original black DSOM
__________________
too much into watches... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Real Name: Frank
Location: Michigan
Watch: Sub 116610LN
Posts: 419
|
Gorgeous - thanks for posting this! I haven't been able to get the SM300 out of my head ... I keep staring at photos of it and re-reading the review in Watch Time. I have to keep convincing myself that my SMP 300m is better, but I'm having trouble ... You're an enabler!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Colorado
Watch: This one
Posts: 633
|
nice!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 273
|
Quote:
Jeremy |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: San Diego
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 572
|
I recently picked up the same one and also have a LVC Sub and have the same feelings as you. I like this one for the things that my Sub isn't.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,431
|
I think the SM 300 is an awesome watch, but when I scrolled down and saw the picture of your sub, it hit me like a bulldozer. the ND sub is gorgeous. Congrats on both.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Alexandria, VA
Watch: Love them.
Posts: 1,091
|
Beautiful watch. Loved mine. I just wish I could have gotten past the faux patina on the lump. The small pip bothered me as it was hard to read....
Still, a great choice. I prefer the 114060m from a design standpoint but the Omega is as nice if not nicer of a watch. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
Congrats!
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Central Cal
Watch: Dads Omega Cal 601
Posts: 707
|
Nice. I like the reissue. Nice subtle changes.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,753
|
Quote:
What's the counter argument? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 273
|
Technically, the PO has better specs. The 300mc has a liquid metal bezel insert, which is only available on the titanium PO and a limited edition version. The 300mc also has a more advanced clasp with micro-adjustment. Beyond that, the only thing I can say is the PO is 1.5-2mms thicker and wears like it's even more of a difference. When I tried on the 42mm PO, it was a beast. The movement, however, is the same with the addition of a date. The PO also has more strap options from Omega. If you're a technically focused person, and you can wear something that big, go for it. I'd try them both on first, though.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
|
I like the Omega but I'd have to brush the entire watch including the lugs, a brushed finished on the whole watch would be interesting to see.
It's one reason I waiting for the blue Tudor Pelagos for my next purchase ![]() Screen+Shot+2015-03-19+at+3.12.59+PM.jpg |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,753
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,185
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,172
|
Quote:
It's not a question of better or over the PO. Omega doesn't market this watch as a replacement, just another option another model in the line up. Look at Rolex and the GMT2c LN vs BLNR vs Exp 2, neither is "better" than the other, just different. The new Seamaster MC, has few good things going for it vs the PO....it's thinner, no He valve, complete antimagnetic movement(14 times stronger than a Rolex Milguass and w/ clear caseback), liquid metal bezel and dial, no date symmetrical dial, adjustable clasp(similar to the Glidelock), pcls and it's new movement now has new certifying rating (METAS) which is arguably more stringent resulting in a more accurate watch. But none of that says it's better, just another watch to choose from, options are good, no. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.