ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

RoRoRo · 2 October 2018, 03:10 AM

Neither

sutats · 2 October 2018, 05:06 AM

If you rang the AD regularly enough to find out how things are it shouldn't take two years to obtain.

The advantage is having a second time zone function and it sits a little lower on the wrist due to the flatter caseback of the GMT-Master II and resultantly 100 meter less depth rating. Furthermore if you chose the 126710BLRO you would benefit from an additional 22 hours of power reserve over 116710BLNR/LN.

sachit · 2 October 2018, 06:12 AM

Both if money is not a concern.

Quailhunter · 2 October 2018, 06:29 AM

I own the BLNR and the platinum Yacht Master. I looked at the Sub several times.

It didn't fit as nicely as the BLNR or YM and it looked very redundant to the BLNR.

I travel a good bit and the BLNR dual time zone feature is convenient.

faz · 2 October 2018, 06:38 AM

This is such a confusing thread.

Title asks one question, initial post asks another, people answer randomly... then get into it with another as the answer is not correct!

Between BLNR and LN, get the BLNR if you can. It is the most handsome Rolex in existence today, in my opinion.

Between Sub and GMT:

- as the one and only watch, I would say GMT: thinner, lighter, easier to wear as a daily, two time zone complication more useful than 300m diving capability, the bling (read: dressy) advantage of polished center links (PCLs).

- as a "both of them together": this is the correct answer.

HORNBLOWER · 2 October 2018, 07:37 AM

Both would be a great start. Lol....

Sticazzi · 2 October 2018, 07:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RoRoRo

Neither

Amusing

2 October 2018, 05:06 AM	#32
sutats "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: London Posts: 1,225	If you rang the AD regularly enough to find out how things are it shouldn't take two years to obtain. The advantage is having a second time zone function and it sits a little lower on the wrist due to the flatter caseback of the GMT-Master II and resultantly 100 meter less depth rating. Furthermore if you chose the 126710BLRO you would benefit from an additional 22 hours of power reserve over 116710BLNR/LN. __________________ There's no such thing as a Submariner No Date, it's simply Submariner. You don't call a Porsche 911 Turbo, a Porsche 911 Turbo No S. www.instagram.com/sutatshorology Post Your Rolex/Tudor Watch Weight (PYRTWW)

2 October 2018, 06:38 AM	#35
faz "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2016 Real Name: Faz Location: California Watch: like'em all Posts: 4,689	This is such a confusing thread. Title asks one question, initial post asks another, people answer randomly... then get into it with another as the answer is not correct! Between BLNR and LN, get the BLNR if you can. It is the most handsome Rolex in existence today, in my opinion. Between Sub and GMT: - as the one and only watch, I would say GMT: thinner, lighter, easier to wear as a daily, two time zone complication more useful than 300m diving capability, the bling (read: dressy) advantage of polished center links (PCLs). - as a "both of them together": this is the correct answer. __________________ -Faz Instagram @fazmoto

2 October 2018, 03:10 AM	#31
RoRoRo "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2018 Location: U.K. Watch: YM40 Posts: 844	Neither

2 October 2018, 06:12 AM	#33
sachit "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2014 Location: india Posts: 455	Both if money is not a concern.

2 October 2018, 06:29 AM	#34
Quailhunter "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2016 Real Name: Doug Location: Georgia USA Watch: Rolex President Posts: 1,348	I own the BLNR and the platinum Yacht Master. I looked at the Sub several times. It didn't fit as nicely as the BLNR or YM and it looked very redundant to the BLNR. I travel a good bit and the BLNR dual time zone feature is convenient.

2 October 2018, 07:37 AM	#36
HORNBLOWER "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Real Name: Ben Location: Ireland Watch: 1 OR 2 Posts: 2,640	Both would be a great start. Lol....

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)