32xx movement problem poll and data thread

[cascadez71]

Originally Posted by Easy E

I would spring a little extra for the 1900.
https://www.amazon.com/OTOOLWORLD-Co...s%2C107&sr=8-6

Thank you.

And this appears to be the guide:
https://www.rolexforums.com/showpost...postcount=5002

Any other posts helpful to read? I am totally new at this. Down the rabbit hole I go.

I held off reading too much into timeographer posts as I didn't want to worry myself too much...but it makes sense to evaluate before/after service, especially now that I have the classic 32 series issues.

[cascadez71]

Originally Posted by tho68

My "practical" expirience confirms what I measured (see below) that my watch is crazy accurate. After around 4 days (including the test period) the deviation is 1s max.

That is fantastic and I hope it stays there for you! I daily wear my 126610LV since March 2021, not taken off for anything besides distance runs. It was scary accurate for the first 3-6 months, then sat at -1 to -1.5 spd for 3 years. Recently it suffered the big 32xx drop off.

I just ordered a Weishi 1900 and will post results. How did you (and others reading this) account for variation when making your excel tables?
Eg. First post in this thread: "DU: +2 to +3 s/d, 256-262 deg" How would you record this as a single value for rate and amplitude on your excel table? Just average? +2.5 s/d, 259 deg ?

[padi56]

Originally Posted by cascadez71

Would you say that colder temperatures result in a "slower" watch? ie. -spd

Whereas warmer ambient is +spd?

Take my advice forget about timegrapher just wear and enjoy your watch in good health now that's far more important.