ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
29 July 2015, 03:33 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Piedmont, CA
Watch: various vintage
Posts: 2,272
|
1675 hands will definitely not be the right fit for a 1665......
__________________
1680 MK II 2.2M (my daily); 1655 MK IV 8.1M (my 1st vintage); 16660 x 4 - 8.0M spider & matte 7.4M, 8.0M, 8.0M; 16610LV F MK I/MK I; 116528 Z; 14060 M COSC; Tudor 75090 Gone.....never forgotten: 14000 F, 14060 V COSC, PAM 048, 16623 F, 1680 MK V 3.1M, 16800 matte 8.3M & 1655 MK IV 7.4M |
29 July 2015, 06:06 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 58
|
|
29 July 2015, 10:06 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Zoran
Location: EU
Watch: 1655 Mark 1
Posts: 1,010
|
I'm sure the RSC will replace those hands with te correct ones, especially if they're not genuine as some have mentioned here.
__________________
|
30 July 2015, 04:05 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 58
|
take 2 weeks the watch passed the RSC .
the hand should be genuine , just relume some time ago . |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.