Introducing the new 2018 Submariner

[dysondiver]

white explorer looks great , black lume ,,, wow

[Maxy]

This Explorer will not happen. Firstly it doesn't look good and secondly if you coat all the markers, 369 and hands in Black, it means No Lume. I doubt you want a Rolex Explorer without any lume.

[Olliepem]

If the new case with the refined lugs is rolled out would this mean that all submariner models would be re-released at the same time or would the maxi case still be in production for say TT and PM models.

[Xerxes77]

I will like to see a RG Sub

[fleabag]

I’d have the sub all day


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Michigan_State]

Personally, I‘d love to see them divert from the “maxi case” and introduce “shaved” lugs for a slimmer profile on the SUB. I also dig the Explorer. Hence, I‘m keeping my fingers crossed.

[TitanCi]

Man that sub would be nice, caliber change seems to make the most sense...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[OJONES]

Originally Posted by Maxy

This Explorer will not happen. Firstly it doesn't look good and secondly if you coat all the markers, 369 and hands in Black, it means No Lume. I doubt you want a Rolex Explorer without any lume.

From the article...

As part of our Rolex Baselworld 2018 predictions, this Explorer 1 “Polar” features a white dial with the iconic 3-6-9 numerals, yet the major update is the addition of black luminous paint on the indexes and hands, creating a high contrast between the dial and the markers.


Can't see it happening myself. Not a fan of the render either. That Sub on the other hand is exactly (I can take or leave the red text) what I'm holding out for.

[tig00s1783]

I’m feelin that sub red text...catches my eye!

[Chadridv]

Originally Posted by Devildog

Would be much simpler (and quite possible) for Rolex to redesign the OF strap in the same manner as a Rubber B or Everest to fit the sub spring bar location

You mean fully integrated end-links? I agree it’d be easier, but I don’t think Rolex would ever take a page out of another company’s book.

I’d be shocked if they basically took someone else’s design, despite it being designed for their watches.

[dreyep]

Originally Posted by Maxy

doubt you want a Rolex Explorer without any lume.

It looks so good, fresh as an icicle, that I'd happily forgo the lume. In any case the lume looks a bit weird on the modern 36mm models as there are these immense and frightening lumeless abysses where the Arabic numerals are, perhaps the only virtue with the later 39mm models, together with their bracelet.

[Maxy]

Originally Posted by dreyep

It looks so good, fresh as an icicle, that I'd happily forgo the lume. In any case the lume looks a bit weird on the modern 36mm models as there are these immense and frightening lumeless abysses where the Arabic numerals are, perhaps the only virtue with the later 39mm models, together with their bracelet.

Once my AD some 4-5 years back had mentioned that Submariner (No date) and Explorer are the only 2 watches which come in just 1 color and style for ages. They want to keep their exclusivity to these 2 models. Take that however you want to.

[amh]

The should indeed fix the sub. It would be like a mini-SD43

[frankoman]

It shouldn't matter anyway because no one will be able to purchase one at least from an AD for several years at the current "production" rate.

[hbombkid]

Originally Posted by Chadridv

The oysteflex and steel option will simply not happen from a technical standpoint. To achieve the lug hole positioning portrayed in their “potential” reference would mean the bracelet endlinks would need a complete redesign.

Look at the RG YM 116655 for example, the reason why you can’t remove the OF strap and simply mount a bracelet on the case is because the lug holes are in a completely different location. This is how, on OF, the gap between the case and strap is so diminished, and good looking IMO. If you mount an OF on a submariner (I’ve done it) the gap looks ridiculous.

Anyway, sorry to be Debbie downer, there’s no one here who’d want an OEM OF option on a SS sports watch.

I think your thinking is just a little off.

Lots of people want an OF for SS watches. I get so many asks how I got it.

I have one and the gap is not that bad. It would be nice to be a little less but even my OCD is not bothered by it and personally I am shocked. The comfort is awesome and being on glide-lock for quick adjustments takes the cake.

We already know Rolex does not like part swapping. An OEM OF could easily work for a redesigned Sub. They would just move the lug holes or create a special OF that would only fit the Sub correctly.

Rolex could also have end links like the Daytona models. They could simply have one OF version and then make end links for different models. That won’t happen though. I don’t have any desire but wonder what my Sub would look like with end links and the OF?

[hbombkid]

Originally Posted by ArtNouveau

I wish the Oysterflex was an option on all appropriate models AND more importantly sold as an accessory after the sale. I'd buy one for my BLNR to change things up occasionally. I think it would look good on all sports models and even on the Datejust.

I would love to see a special edition box set.

The watch on steel, then the OF and a special screwdriver to swap out.

Won’t happen, but would be cool and Rolex would definitely jack up the price.

[RHJ]

The layout of the Explorer doesn't work with a white background in my opinion. Sub with red line is too similar to SD43.
Cellini triple calendar would be very nice

[gegarrenton]

That Explorer is gorgeous.

[Dirt]

Originally Posted by Chadridv

The oysteflex and steel option will simply not happen from a technical standpoint. To achieve the lug hole positioning portrayed in their “potential” reference would mean the bracelet endlinks would need a complete redesign.

Look at the RG YM 116655 for example, the reason why you can’t remove the OF strap and simply mount a bracelet on the case is because the lug holes are in a completely different location. This is how, on OF, the gap between the case and strap is so diminished, and good looking IMO. If you mount an OF on a submariner (I’ve done it) the gap looks ridiculous.

Anyway, sorry to be Debbie downer, there’s no one here who’d want an OEM OF option on a SS sports watch.

Actually, from a technical standpoint.
A day or two spent drawing up what are very minor changes by someone on the computer at Rolex will be all that is required to address the details around the connection points of the OF and end links you mention.
The rest will be just inconsequential when it comes to production.
After all we are only talking about a simple universal hole location, dimensioning and some styling to make it universal.

It's about time Rolex started to give people more options with regard to optioning Strap and Bracelet alternatives for the same watch model and the Sub would be an ideal candidate for this.
I would suggest something more than the tired old NATO strap opotions would be in order.
Omega are doing it for their watches with their iconic watch the Speedmaster being a prime example, even if one doesn't necessarily like all the current offerings.
The classic 42mm Speedy is a very versatile watch with the amount of great 20mm strap options available whether they be genuine or aftermarket.

[Dirt]

Originally Posted by gegarrenton

That Explorer is gorgeous.

Yes it is quite nice and it would be interesting to see something in the flesh.
All the other renditions have a lot of merit as well

[Dirt]

Originally Posted by Maxy

This Explorer will not happen. Firstly it doesn't look good and secondly if you coat all the markers, 369 and hands in Black, it means No Lume. I doubt you want a Rolex Explorer without any lume.

I think it's possible to have Black lume.

[VicLeChic]

This is a sexy Sub, those lugs! No date in 42mm and Oysterflex (on top of the bracelet) is my preference. Would still be attractive in 40mm though. Realistically, it'd be hard to justify owning already the SD43.

However, I'd be very curious to see the new Hulk in this slender case and perhaps a slightly different green, not much different but just enough to mark the generational change and the 65 years of the Sub? Come on, Rolex! Show us your almighty power!!!

[AK797]

Originally Posted by OJONES

From the article...

As part of our Rolex Baselworld 2018 predictions, this Explorer 1 “Polar” features a white dial with the iconic 3-6-9 numerals, yet the major update is the addition of black luminous paint on the indexes and hands, creating a high contrast between the dial and the markers.


Can't see it happening myself. Not a fan of the render either. That Sub on the other hand is exactly (I can take or leave the red text) what I'm holding out for.

It looks a bit like the black onyx on the YM which I like.

[DLRIDES]

The slimmer lugs on the Sub works !

42mm would be nice compliment to the lug shape !

[Gharddog03]

Red text is a nice touch.

[Magwitch]

Aside from potential new releases I'd like to see Rolex loosen the restrictive policies on ordering bracelets, dials, etc.

[David5807]

Great post!

I would love to own the sub with a rubber strap like that.

[Otto]

I’d prefer a flat white, almost cream white dial on the Explorer, the dial close in overall appearance to the watches taken on the 1953 Everest expedition, but with the the Explorer branding, and with a distressed brown leather strap with bracelet option.

[rhairman]

I'd really like to see how the genius people in Rolex design the new Submariner after they put a cyclops on SD43...

[Triple Crown]

I think the Polar Explorer I would work better if Rolex borrowed from the Polar Explorer II, i.e. outline the markers, numbers, hands, etc. in black and keep the lume “white.”