ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
31 December 2012, 11:30 PM | #31 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,834
|
Very informative thread. One stop shop for the OQ
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982- |
2 January 2013, 03:24 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
|
Great info
HAGOne |
3 January 2013, 10:39 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NB, TX
Watch: 3570.50
Posts: 1,016
|
My first - from 1984. I wore it New Year's Day. One factory service in its whole life.
____________________________ TT OysterQuartz SS/Black "U" Daytona TT GMT II-C DD OysterQuartz Breitling Aero Omega Speedmaster Pro |
3 January 2013, 11:55 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: DOUBLE RY
Location: NYC
Watch: and learn.
Posts: 289
|
[QUOTE=GTS Dean;3836786]My first - from 1984. I wore it New Year's Day. One factory service in its whole life.
That's a beautiful OQ! Mine says hi. |
3 January 2013, 03:20 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Australia
Watch: Oysterquart 17014A
Posts: 11
|
And mine!
Oysterquartz: The 'Rolex of quartz watches' and the 'The Quartz watch of the Rolexes' |
3 January 2013, 09:04 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Watch: See my signature
Posts: 1,189
|
Just recently sold:
Currently in wrist rotation:
__________________
"Woody and Jen say hey from North Kakalaki" 19019, 19018x3, 17000x2, 16570x2, 16220, 5700, 1501, 6564, 16030, 16710, 16610 |
4 January 2013, 09:03 AM | #37 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Honitel
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 148
|
Wow,those are really interesting information up there! I was amazed on the 'ads' lasted without oxygen! Great stuff,I must say!
|
10 January 2013, 02:39 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Grenoble/London
Posts: 12
|
hi,
for my first post, pics of mine. i really love this watche, i have 5 rolex but this one is ther most comfortable ever, and precise as well ! the next one , probably a 19018 |
13 January 2013, 11:45 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 13
|
Love this best topic too.
However, can anyone help me to clarify about the hands of this Oysterquartz. I can't see any lume on it. Does it normal? (pic from google) |
14 January 2013, 12:05 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Watch: See my signature
Posts: 1,189
|
Not sure about the hands but that's the first one I've seen with the slate jubilee dial. My 17000 is at the watchmaker so I can't verify if it has lume or not... Seems unlikely the hands would be replaced especially considering the condition of the dial.
.
__________________
"Woody and Jen say hey from North Kakalaki" 19019, 19018x3, 17000x2, 16570x2, 16220, 5700, 1501, 6564, 16030, 16710, 16610 |
14 January 2013, 01:25 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Southern England
Watch: a genuine one
Posts: 355
|
Hi, you dont seem to hear much about the quartz models on the forum, but i quite like them. I have known of them for some time but never seen one in the flesh so to speak and never seen one for sale locally. Can you give me a rough guide as to prices they are likely to achieve. There are actually 2 on ebay in the uk at the moment but not sure if they are well priced and it is a few hours round trip to have a look. Is there anything in particular that i need to be aware of when looking?
By the way great pictures.
__________________
Caveat Emptor Let The Buyer Beware |
14 January 2013, 05:19 AM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: sweden
Posts: 1
|
Here is my OQ collection
17000, 17013, 19019 p-series & 17014 a-serial
|
14 January 2013, 09:04 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Chris
Location: Concord, Ma
Watch: your back
Posts: 422
|
Always find it fascinating that current day wrist shots of the quartz are always of mint condition pieces. I mean, there wrists shots out there of pieces from 10 years ago that look beat to a pulp, but never the OQ.
Kudos to those who keep theirs in a1 condition. |
14 January 2013, 01:30 PM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 13
|
Actually, I have ever seen some of DJ dial 's hands without lume too. Don't know the certain criteria from Rolex to choose with or without lume.
Within same dial, I have ever seen both of them too ( with and without lume on hands) |
14 January 2013, 06:13 PM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Madrid (Spain)
Posts: 702
|
|
14 January 2013, 07:20 PM | #46 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Australia
Watch: Oysterquart 17014A
Posts: 11
|
Quote:
Yes, they’re rare, I’ve only ever seen one other OysterQuartz in the flesh, but I live in Australia, where there’s relatively less of everything anyway. I’ve seen a lot of badly beaten up OysterQuartzs priced too high. I paid $3500 for this one, on eBay, about two months ago, but it’s supposed to be a slightly rarer model (17014A) and it has a WG fluted bezel, and it was made in one of the last production years, Y2000, and I believe it’s had a full RSC overhaul. It has been supplied to me with a 2Y warranty, I assume from the RSC through the eBay vendor. Condition of this one is really very good – pretty well looks like new - and it’s keeping near-perfect time, so far it has lost only 1 second in 10 weeks, and doesn't seem to be losing any more. I’ve bought this one as an alternative to shelling out about $7K for a new mechanical Rolex. I must say I like the styling, size, finish and accuracy of this watch much more than any new mechanical Rolex. The finish of this watch stacks up beautifully against the latest new $13.5k gold/steel Submariner, but without the Sub’s (for me unwearable) oversize and overbling. These OQ’s, in good condition, are just beautifully finished bits of slab steel, Rolex in 'Zen' mode. Many of the rough OysterQuartz’s I've seen have badly reconditioned cases. I’d be looking for clean, sharp facets. Also there are some with really bad dials and hands… how do they get so wrecked? (Personally I have no ambition to take the back off my Rolex and have a fiddle with its innards – for me this is a job for the trained watchmakers at RSC, operating inside their clean rooms with all the right tools and parts, and no-one else). Another problem, of course, is that many vendors/sellers use blurry, crappy looking photographs when trying to sell their watches, which coupled with a lack of detailed honest info, doesn't help. If you look for a late model, like this one, then the movement will be younger and you should also score the newer whiter lume, which works quite well, and which seems to be accompanied by the words ‘SWISS MADE’ on the dial at the 6 o’clock position (not visible in my photo, but it’s there); I’d avoid the older tritium models (dials typically seem to be marked ‘SWISS’) as it will probably already be dead or half-dead. The earliest models were dial-marked ‘OYSTERQUARTZ’ instead of ‘S.C.O.C’, and some have no lume on the dial but do have lumed hands. Personally I’d go for the ‘S.C.O.C’ marking (or 'S.C.O.C + SWISS MADE') with the aim of getting a younger movement. I think the simpler Oyster bracelet on the OysterQuartz 17000 is perhaps more comfortable than the Jubilee bracelet on this 17014A, as the finer links of this Jubilee bracelet tend to create a rougher, slightly sharper surface inside the bracelet. If you want a watch which is built like the best Rolex ever, but happens to keep the right time, buy one of these. [IMG][/IMG] |
|
15 January 2013, 04:13 AM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Grenoble/London
Posts: 12
|
i agree, very comfy, precise, quite rare, still affordable and the best is the 5 yrs power reserve
ps : the blue jubilee dial is fantastic ! |
8 February 2013, 03:37 PM | #48 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Australia
Watch: Oysterquart 17014A
Posts: 11
|
Quote:
Roll over and die... Hey, how about some photos of yours? Isn't this a great case design? Less is definitely more... |
|
8 February 2013, 11:59 PM | #49 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 41,777
|
How about the Rolex Oysterquartz that never was? The elusive Rolex LED described in the upcoming English translation of "Electrifying the Wristwatch" by Lucien F. Trueb, Gunther Ramm, and Peter Wenzig.
As the story goes (I read this on another forum late last year) Patrick Heiniger rejected an engineering project after 5 prototypes of a 5055 driven LED watch were made in the late '70s. There you have it, an Oysterquartz Analog LED watch that never saw the light of day - supposedly all 5 prototypes were destroyed...or were they? Poorly scanned pic from the original German book, Die Elektrifzierung des Armbanduhr.
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
9 February 2013, 08:50 AM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: DOUBLE RY
Location: NYC
Watch: and learn.
Posts: 289
|
|
10 February 2013, 02:25 AM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Grenoble/London
Posts: 12
|
when friends come and told about "mechanical noblesse" i laugh, of course passion is'n reason, but the OQ caliber is the most accurate ever made !
|
12 February 2013, 11:07 AM | #52 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Australia
Watch: Oysterquart 17014A
Posts: 11
|
Air-King, Oysterquartz accuracy
Quote:
My Y1976 Air King loses 3s per day. My Y2000 Oysterquartz looks like being exactly right, or maybe losing 2s per year! |
|
15 March 2013, 10:36 PM | #53 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 8
|
mine
|
16 March 2013, 04:46 AM | #54 | |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,952
|
Quote:
Not quite true the first quartz wristwatch implementation of thermocompensation was achieved with the integration of a thermistor into the IC circuit was from Sieko.Now this IC application in a quartz wrist watch was first invented by Seiko in 1959.Then a few years after followed by CEH group of Switzerland (of which Rolex was one of the founding members) this was in 1962. This first appeared in 1977, in the Rolex Oysterquartz DJ. The Rolex quartz module was referred to as a VCTCXO (Voltage Compensated Temperature Compensated Crystal Oscillator).But although Rolex have never given any official figures for accuracy it was around +- 60 seconds a year but could be trimed less.While the top line Seiko Grand And around the same time as the Oysterquartz some of the selected Grand Seiko Japanese quartz model these were very accurate quartz model but very expensive even then.But not heard of much in the western world then mainy Japan and far east only. Note 1: Seiko re-issued a limited edition of the "Astron" around 2000 that used a special version of the 9F movement that was used in the 1980s models but now rated to ± 2 seconds per year after adjustment. Now most certainly the Japanese movement accuracy was much better than the Rolex movement Note 2: The 9F movement is reportedly designed to run fifty plus years before it needs servicing. Note 3: Other Grand Seiko quartz models use the 8J movement. Even less is know about this movement. Source of information: Japanese retail sites
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
|
19 April 2013, 06:39 AM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 47
|
Here's mine.
|
23 April 2013, 11:16 PM | #56 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Lillie L. Clar
Location: San Jose
Watch: Casio
Posts: 20
|
Superb thread!!!!! I'm looking for such an informative post. I like that first blue dial Rolex Watch....
|
4 May 2013, 08:53 AM | #57 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Mo
Location: GermanyNewZealand
Watch: Tiffany & Co NY NY
Posts: 69
|
Note to self: search the forum before opening a thread of my own ^o^
thanks a lot guys, for all the info and the pics I think my first Rolex will be an OQ :-D |
31 May 2013, 05:44 AM | #58 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 44
|
My faithful OQ......as accurate as my £45 Seiko???? Actually the Seiko keeps about dot on each year, the OQ gains about 2 seconds.....so I never complain, its a cracker.
[IMG][/IMG] Of course the Seiko is only a couple of years old, my OQ from 1977 gives it a good run for its money, just look at the quality of the hands.......wonderfull |
1 June 2013, 09:22 AM | #59 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Mikki
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: Your Six
Posts: 1,146
|
Very very pretty watch. I really like the OQs
__________________
No Matter Where You Go - There You Are
(and so's your Rolex) Card Carrying Chinese Crested Owner |
24 June 2013, 03:59 AM | #60 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Europe
Watch: Rolex 17000 OQ
Posts: 24
|
Oohhhhh, that blue dial is just sooooo coooool!
Here's mine |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.