The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11 September 2024, 04:31 AM   #31
Rollieo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 1,171
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devildog View Post
No one ever complained about the gold Daytonas on the alligator straps being "far too expensive for a watch with a leather strap".

Some folk just have an issue because its rubber and not leather, as it used to be both pre and post ceramic bezels.

I'd have PM on Oysterflex all day every day before going grey for SS at the same price.

Yes, the PM bezel is a nightmare to maintain if worn regularly as its design somehow magnifies the impact of any scratches, scuffs etc on the aesthetics when reading the time, to the point you really have to consider it a service item.



Very well said and good points
Rollieo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 September 2024, 12:42 AM   #32
gt0279a
"TRF" Member
 
gt0279a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Steve
Location: Georgia
Watch: All of them
Posts: 579
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1259 View Post
How did you get the OF strap for an SS?


Ordered from an AD. They do come up on the forums for sale as well.
__________________
Current:
Rolex Daytona 116500 | Rolex Submariner 116610 | Zenith El Primero 03.2150.400/69
Past:
Rolex Sea Dweller 126600 | Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 | Rolex Sea Dweller 16600 | Rolex Submariner 16610 | Rolex Submariner 1680
gt0279a is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 September 2024, 12:18 AM   #33
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,935
Quote:
Originally Posted by GarageBMW View Post

Anybody having both 126500 and 126519 in their collection, please share your experience ;)

Thanks everyone.
I think, if you're going to have two Daytona's in your collection, the steel and the OF makes more sense than two steels - that is, if you are more of a 'diversified' collector as opposed to a 'themed' one. But let's face it, there really are no wrong answers when it comes to a Daytona.

They wear, look, and feel completely different, which is what I'm after. Good luck,
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 September 2024, 01:29 PM   #34
1259
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: California
Posts: 337
Quote:
Originally Posted by gt0279a View Post
Ordered from an AD. They do come up on the forums for sale as well.
I’ve tried before and was told they would only allow you to do it if you have a PM watch. Do you have an SS and PM model or do I need to ask a new AD?
1259 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2024, 04:32 PM   #35
928ktgold
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: LA
Watch: what’s next.
Posts: 1,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by Straphanger View Post
I own the 116500 panda, 126500 panda and 126519 ghost love every which one , love the way they wear and look ,but end up wearing my sub because I cannot see the time on those Daytona dials ? May be I need a black dial and a new pair of glasses !!
Black dial is harder to read on the 126500LN
928ktgold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2024, 12:48 PM   #36
Farran
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Denver
Watch: AP Legacy
Posts: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rollieo View Post
Personally I think a gold piece is way more special than the stainless daytona, granted I understand the ss daytona is much harder to get at retail. The choice of having a gold Daytona at retail vs ss daytona secondary same price - no brainer I’ll take the gold piece.

A few things guiding my decision -

1. I wanted a ceramic bezel. Rolex doesn’t make gold pieces with ceramic bezels (unless it’s the platinum or lemans).

2. OF is super comfortable and makes the watch very wearable in a lot of situations.

3. OF Daytona come in a number of really nice configurations. There’s a version that is for everyone

4. This is less of a reason in the beginning, but as I’ve started to wear gold more I appreciate the heft on my wrist with the balanced OF bracelet. Bonus fact that (as least to my knowledge) there aren’t any fake gold watches out there. They just can’t easily replicate the weight.

I agree with this, well said
Farran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 September 2024, 10:02 AM   #37
Buschy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Dennis
Location: DFW TX
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 363
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Superlative View Post
I own the current 126519 "Ghost" OF Daytona, and the old 116500 in Blk. As others have already said, the PM it is a stunning watch. What made me choose the WG was its sheer versatility. I don't like using the word 'investment', but as a long term watch, your $ is safe. The precious metal is supremely well finished, and if it can be had a MSRP from an AD and you have the means, it is an obvious choice to go for it.

The stainless steel is utterly brilliant, no question about it. However...as others have alluded to, if I had to pay $40k for a WG on OF, versus $30-$35k for stainless steel, I'd choose the white gold every single time. If you can get an S/S at retail, you'd be bonkers to turn it down. However, comparing the precious metal to the s/s is not an entirely apples for apples comparison IMHO.
my question. can it be had for msrp at AD? no such luck here, they are secondary also so price gap is higher
Buschy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal

WatchesOff5th


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.