The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9 July 2007, 07:00 PM   #31
Andad
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,234
I have always been surprised at the number of genuine Rolex watches that are offered for sale without papers.

Now that I am learning more about Rolex I see that the number (or serial letter and number) on the watch dates the watch within a certain time span and that this can be quite a long time span.

I think we might now see Rolex simply mark the watch with a s/n but it will be the date of sale that dates the watch. This will mean that the plastic card (with purchaser, model number, s/n and date of sale) will now become very important and 'date' the watch exactly with the s/n on the card confirming the watch's ID. The card must now accompany the watch or Rolex would need to certify the authenticity via their records.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 July 2007, 10:37 PM   #32
Alcan
2024 Pledge Member
 
Alcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Al
Location: Way Up North
Watch: your P's & Q's
Posts: 10,473
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
What letters have NOT been used as a Rolex serial prefix.??
B G H I J M O Q V.

I can see why O wasn't used, too easy to mix with 0, maybe the same for Q, and "I" could be mistaken for 1.

For all we know, Rolex could continue their alpha-numeric serials using double letters to prefix them. I know a couple of girls who'd fit perfectly wearing the DDxxx serial #.
__________________
Member #1,315

I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution!
Alcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 July 2007, 10:42 PM   #33
Alcan
2024 Pledge Member
 
Alcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Al
Location: Way Up North
Watch: your P's & Q's
Posts: 10,473
Quote:
Originally Posted by directioneng View Post
Now that I am learning more about Rolex I see that the number (or serial letter and number) on the watch dates the watch within a certain time span and that this can be quite a long time span.
Conversely, some serial #'s were used for a very short time span. E, X and N serial #'s could all be 1991. Makes me wonder why they did that.
__________________
Member #1,315

I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution!
Alcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 July 2007, 11:04 PM   #34
nko51
"TRF" Member
 
nko51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Alex
Location: USA
Watch: TT Blue Sub
Posts: 2,542
Quote:
Originally Posted by astcell View Post
With all the different used Rolexes out there with all the different letters to show when they were made, is the Z going to be the best of the bunch, since it is the last of the old GMT design and represents the end of the old school Rolexes?
The Z appears to have the most defects per capita, it may becoming avoided like the plague instead!
__________________
nko51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2007, 03:11 AM   #35
astcell
"TRF" Member
 
astcell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Robert
Location: Angelus Oaks, CA
Watch: 116713
Posts: 6,828
Or having a Z series that works is even rarer!
astcell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2007, 04:11 AM   #36
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by astcell View Post
Or having a Z series that works is even rarer!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2007, 08:03 AM   #37
Teofilo
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: East Anglia
Watch: 14060M,16710 PEPSI
Posts: 923
Quote:
Originally Posted by astcell View Post
Or having a Z series that works is even rarer!
Got two that work like a treat..........
Does anyone have any hard evidence to say if one year would be more or less reliable than any other ?
I think it unlikely that the Swiss would suddenly start turning out shoddy watches
But I am really new at this
Teofilo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2007, 10:33 AM   #38
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,346
Peter,
We're just bashing Z's because they are the latest, and currently the most sought after, serial run. D's were before them; but I hope in most cases it is harmless fun.

Just haveing watched the forums on Rolex the past few years, photography is getting more detailed, and the use a 10X loupe seems to be the latest investigation tool for the watch officianado. Internally they are largely unchanged and very robust.

A few years ago this nit-picking of every visible aspect of a watch was unheard of.

My guess is there is no data base (outside Rolex corporate) for which series may have more returns for defects than others.

Watchmakers have their own opinions of how the new ones compare with older models, but I would let them chime in rather than speculate.

Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 July 2007, 06:51 AM   #39
Teofilo
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: East Anglia
Watch: 14060M,16710 PEPSI
Posts: 923
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
Peter,
We're just bashing Z's because they are the latest, and currently the most sought after, serial run. D's were before them; but I hope in most cases it is harmless fun.

Just haveing watched the forums on Rolex the past few years, photography is getting more detailed, and the use a 10X loupe seems to be the latest investigation tool for the watch officianado. Internally they are largely unchanged and very robust.

A few years ago this nit-picking of every visible aspect of a watch was unheard of.

My guess is there is no data base (outside Rolex corporate) for which series may have more returns for defects than others.

Watchmakers have their own opinions of how the new ones compare with older models, but I would let them chime in rather than speculate.

Larry, probably the internet and forums like this have got a lot to do with the quality that we now demand from everything.
It is amazing when you think of it that we can see pictures of watches from Singapore,Las Vegas and Australia within 30 minutes of the buyer walking out of the AD. Technology is going far faster than I can keep up with
Teofilo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.