ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
14 March 2011, 02:38 PM | #31 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Ted
Location: SF Bay Area
Watch: tt Ceramic Sub
Posts: 141
|
Great review on a fantastic watch.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. |
18 March 2011, 06:10 AM | #32 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: Virginia
Watch: 116610LN C
Posts: 478
|
Quote:
|
|
18 March 2011, 06:23 AM | #33 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Vince
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: GMT 116710
Posts: 215
|
Just got mine as well. 4 days old and loving it
|
18 March 2011, 07:30 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: Virginia
Watch: 116610LN C
Posts: 478
|
The sub has been my favorite for a while. I was on my way to see my AD about the LV and they had just sold it, 2nd choice is the GMT II C and so i decided to take her home and I am so pleased. I do think the watch is smarter than I am cause I am still trying to figure out how to use three times zones at once!!!!!!
The contrast in the bracelet is beautiful!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! "A crown for every achievement" is such a cool statement!!! |
20 March 2011, 12:25 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: Virginia
Watch: 116610LN C
Posts: 478
|
great review!! I picked up a GMT IIC a couple of days ago and I am having trouble giving my others any love at all, Man this is beautiful watch!!!!!!
__________________
Don't just make a living, make a difference! |
22 March 2011, 07:00 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Excellent review!
The GMT IIc sure is a winner! |
3 April 2011, 05:35 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Colin Daly
Location: Auckland NZ
Watch: PO liquid metal
Posts: 12
|
Sold because fell out of love
Hi - great review - I actually sold mine recently as I just fell out with the watch. For me the balance is wrong and I really didn't like polished centre links. I sold an explorer II to fund GMT and I am now reverting - don't know if I can wait for the AD release of new one
So I am left with PO liquid metal until I can make my mind up!! Cheers |
5 April 2011, 02:21 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: So-Cal
Watch: your SIX
Posts: 277
|
Great review, while in Vegas this weekend i tried one on for the first time. Soooo i know what my next watch will be.
__________________
|
5 April 2011, 02:46 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Steve
Location: San Diego
Watch: GMT2c & LVc
Posts: 220
|
Excellent review....apart from starting a sentence with a capital 'And'
I have 6 GMT's and the ceramic is my favourite and gets worn the most. |
5 April 2011, 03:03 AM | #40 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Jon
Location: Chicago
Watch: IIc,DJII,P244,A1-Z
Posts: 2,857
|
Quote:
Still loving my IIc. It's one perfect timepiece. |
|
9 April 2011, 11:02 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Renfrewshire UK
Posts: 9
|
This GMT thing must be catching!
[QUOTE=Steve748;2411469]Excellent review....apart from starting a sentence with a capital 'And'
Having just bought my first Rolex - a GMT llc TT - I concur fully with the sentiments expressed by GMTFan! It is indeed a fine timepiece. I trust your written use of the German language Steve748 is as proficient as Jann's English is, to justify the linguistic pedantry? |
17 April 2011, 01:13 AM | #42 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: USA
Watch: 116613LN Sub
Posts: 137
|
just bought one and i love it
thanks for the review |
23 August 2011, 11:12 AM | #43 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Ohio-USA
Watch: GMTIIC SubC LV
Posts: 142
|
Very nice review GMT Fan. Well I did want to get back with you on the roughness of the lug that you stated in your review. When I wear shirts with cuffs I do not have a problem. However, I do get annoyed that the cuffed part of the shirt goes vertically down when I wear the watch. So, I have to keep on straightening it out all the time. The watch is great though. The dealer told me that it looks good with everything, but I think he was just trying to sell me the watch. It really does though. I have the SS version, so its not very flashy, which is nice about the watch. It is very conventional, and can be very useful. I am not really a traveler, but when I do, I find it to be a useful watch. I however, find a lot of the Rolex bracelets to be a little under done. I think they could do a better job with them, but that is just a personal opinion. Thanks for the great review!
|
2 September 2011, 01:53 AM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Brady
Location: San Antonio
Watch: yes please
Posts: 525
|
Fantastic review. I am getting the itch for one of these and your review is not helping matters
|
7 September 2011, 05:49 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: St louis
Posts: 347
|
Great review. Excellent write up!
|
7 September 2011, 08:29 AM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: R S Gibson
Location: manchester uk
Watch: gmt 16750 matte di
Posts: 19
|
My wrist is only 7.5 inches,when I tried the new GMT it looked and felt a lot bigger than my 16750 and 16700.The lack of a quick set date, is also a minus for me.Great review!!
|
7 September 2011, 09:21 AM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Al
Location: California, USA
Watch: GMT- Pepsi
Posts: 3,462
|
Thanks
Thanks for taking the time to gather and draft your thoughts about the GMTII-C.
I am getting the impression that it would be the best everyday wear watch for me... |
7 September 2011, 09:48 AM | #48 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
|
Well done.
|
7 September 2011, 09:48 AM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Doug
Location: Oceanside
Watch: 116710
Posts: 34
|
Got both the old and the new. I love the new one best, for all the reasons you mentioned.
And yes, to the cleaning. It's now a neurotic habit too keep shinny. DK |
10 September 2011, 03:36 PM | #50 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: HK
Posts: 81
|
Nice review!
|
10 September 2011, 07:17 PM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: *
Posts: 2,323
|
Great review.
__________________
Member# 52,675 Est. 3/2011 |
11 September 2011, 12:23 AM | #52 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Erik Szper
Location: Baltimore
Watch: PAM326
Posts: 24,468
|
Great review, well thought out and written. The edges can leave their mark on french cuffs, but notice wear on my left pocket than anywhere else.
Saw an earlier question and response about the case size and bracelet proportions. As an temporary holder of numerous fine timepieces, and maybe a little ore experience at my disposal, think this is one of the areas that the watch falls on. Really feel the bracelet and clasp lack balance with the head. Seems that only an extra mm or 2 could have made all the difference. Still a pheonomenal piece! |
26 October 2011, 03:19 AM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Alejandro
Location: uruguay
Watch: your step!
Posts: 430
|
Excellent review - thanks!
|
28 October 2011, 04:31 AM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Dubai
Posts: 4
|
excellent review, I must have them! :-)
|
13 March 2012, 05:39 AM | #55 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: USA
Watch: GMTIIC 116710
Posts: 30
|
After waiting years to acquire my first Rolex, I picked up my GMTIIC last weekend from an AD and this review underscores my decision.
Thank you for an outstanding review. |
13 March 2012, 06:31 PM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 3,472
|
like all watches there are positives and negatives. ive had the gmt2c for about 3 years.
negative: 1. pcl - if you dont like it, there are plenty of other models with brushed links. rolex really makes its watches blingy. the sides of the links and the case are very shiny and get noticed a lot. that's true for most models. 2. sharp lugs - makes the watch harder to adjust on wrist. resulting to more smudges and finger prints. 3. 24H hand not very noticable - i like that very much. makes the watch very clean. but its there when i need it. 4. no AR coating on the crystal - this is annoying. sometimes you cant see the time due to the reflection then you have to adjust your watch but then the sharp lugs get in the way. positive: 1. the weight is great, the comfort is great. 2. everything else is perfect. it just so happens there are more positives than negatives in the gmt2c. the price has increased 17% already since i bought it. if youre planning to get one, buy before another #$%% increase. |
26 May 2012, 02:17 AM | #57 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Jake C
Location: San Francisco
Watch: 116610LN, 116613LB
Posts: 286
|
Excellent review! I just purchased the same watch yesterday, happiest I've ever been with any watch I've owned so far. Really appreciate this review.
|
26 May 2012, 02:42 AM | #58 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Tim
Location: Denver
Watch: GMT Master II
Posts: 7
|
Great Review!
|
26 May 2012, 01:51 PM | #59 |
Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Dennis
Location: GMT -5
Watch: 116710
Posts: 102
|
Nice review! That will be my next Rollie.
|
14 July 2012, 08:14 PM | #60 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: James
Location: dallas
Watch: Sub-c
Posts: 78
|
Great review!!
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.