ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Arturo · 26 February 2007, 01:53 AM

It is the amazing combination of all these elements that make for such a strong and perfect watch. Plus the history, and the clear feeling that there is simply ONE PRODUCT in the world that won't change course and sell out to Asia or downgrade. It is the one company that truly manifests excellence, has always had that in its history, and will in generations to come. Changes and improvements will come slowly and only wtih much thought. I am most fascinated by one of the most well deserved trade names in the world.

Dimitris · 26 February 2007, 01:57 AM

the obssesion with perfection

Alex Stylianou · 26 February 2007, 02:09 AM

The Dial

A. Jacobs · 26 February 2007, 02:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arturo

It is the amazing combination of all these elements that make for such a strong and perfect watch. Plus the history, and the clear feeling that there is simply ONE PRODUCT in the world that won't change course and sell out to Asia or downgrade. It is the one company that truly manifests excellence, has always had that in its history, and will in generations to come. Changes and improvements will come slowly and only wtih much thought. I am most fascinated by one of the most well deserved trade names in the world.

That pretty much says it all

Solo118 · 26 February 2007, 03:07 AM

Of these choices on the poll I must say the dial, But theres so much more to love about these watches even if it is physically like the case or movement etc

Chimpy · 26 February 2007, 03:19 AM

For me, it's the bracelet and the name accompanied with the history behind it. I wait tables for a living right now (21, in college) and with my Date on layaway and behind totally obsessed with Rolexes, my tables seem to give me a more generous tip if I've voiced my notice for a great looking Sub or Datejust and get into the story that I'm waiting until I get my first one.

kingblackbolt · 26 February 2007, 03:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arturo

It is the amazing combination of all these elements that make for such a strong and perfect watch. Plus the history, and the clear feeling that there is simply ONE PRODUCT in the world that won't change course and sell out to Asia or downgrade. It is the one company that truly manifests excellence, has always had that in its history, and will in generations to come. Changes and improvements will come slowly and only wtih much thought. I am most fascinated by one of the most well deserved trade names in the world.

I agree 100% you have summed it all up nicely... they could produce a watch cheaper and makemore profit by outsourcing but choose not too... how many companies can claim that these days?

Also should'nt the "movement" be listed as a reason to buy a Rolex as well?

President · 26 February 2007, 03:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kingblackbolt

I agree 100% you have summed it all up nicely... they could produce a watch cheaper and makemore profit by outsourcing but choose not too... how many companies can claim that these days?

Also should'nt the "movement" be listed as a reason to buy a Rolex as well?

Apple can!

JJ Irani · 26 February 2007, 05:12 AM

Guys, guys....

The purpose of this post was to find out which ACTUAL PHYSICAL part of a Rolex you liked.....not its history or background or blah, blah, blah.

I just wanted to know what appeals most to you when you actually LOOK at a Rolex. So no point in talking about irrelevant things like history, etc. If we want history, there are watches out there with a far better history than that of Rolex.

Let's just talk about the PHYSICAL and appealing aspects of the watch.

Thanks - JJ

A. Jacobs · 26 February 2007, 05:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

Guys, guys....

The purpose of this post was to find out which ACTUAL PHYSICAL part of a Rolex you liked.....not its history or background or blah, blah, blah.

I just wanted to know what appeals most to you when you actually LOOK at a Rolex. So no point in talking about irrelevant things like history, etc. If we want history, there are watches out there with a far better history than that of Rolex.

Let's just talk about the PHYSICAL and appealing aspects of the watch.

Thanks - JJ

Wow JJ, Tell us how you REALLY feel-don't hold back next time, tosser.

JJ Irani · 26 February 2007, 05:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A. Jacobs

Wow JJ, Tell us how you REALLY feel-don't hold back next time, tosser.

Well, maybe it was my fault....I didn't make it very clear in my very first post of this thread.

I was only interested in what appealed to you guys on immediately looking at a Rolex....not the bloody history, etc. etc.

JJ

A. Jacobs · 26 February 2007, 05:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

Well, maybe it was my fault....I didn't make it very clear in my very first post of this thread.

I was only interested in what appealed to you guys on immediately looking at a Rolex....not the bloody history, etc. etc.

JJ

Well for the record, I did say that the dial was the most appealing, so there you go.

500

JJ Irani · 26 February 2007, 05:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A. Jacobs

Well for the record, I did say that the dial was the most appealing, so there you go.

500

You, me and 23 other tossers (thus far!!)

Arturo · 26 February 2007, 10:22 AM

OK JJ, what fascinates me the most is the word ROLEX on the front of the dial. That very word on the dial fascinates me the most. It is a powerful word.

JJ Irani · 26 February 2007, 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arturo

OK JJ, what fascinates me the most is the word ROLEX on the front of the dial. That very word on the dial fascinates me the most. It is a powerful word.

Agreed - 100%!!

Xkalifornian · 26 February 2007, 11:06 AM

For myself, when I view the simple Submariner/Seadweller as the stainless bracelet flows so elegantly into the deep black of the dial which is impeccably framed by the deep black bezel. We are so used to seeing this standard bearer over the decades on Rolexes as well as the others who have "borrowed" this design. We sometimes don't give it a second thought. It has been and always will be The classic design which all others are compared to. It is a true work of funtional art. And very manly at that.

A. Jacobs · 26 February 2007, 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xkalifornian

For myself, when I view the simple Submariner/Seadweller as the stainless bracelet flows so elegantly into the deep black of the dial which is impeccably framed by the deep black bezel. We are so used to seeing this standard bearer over the decades on Rolexes as well as the others who have "borrowed" this design. We sometimes don't give it a second thought. It has been and always will be The classic design which all others are compared to. It is a true work of funtional art. And very manly at that.

Great compliment on a truly iconic timepiece.

puffnmo · 26 February 2007, 11:26 AM

For me it's the pure clarity of the design, and the clean lines, perfect edges. Those are a very distinctive Rolex feature, common to every single one I have ever seen. Larry.

montecristo · 26 February 2007, 11:37 AM

got to go with the dial currently, looks much better than my crappy camera skills.

View Poll Results: I am fascinated most by the...
Dial	31	60.78%
Bezel	6	11.76%
Crown	2	3.92%
Bracelet	8	15.69%
Clasp	1	1.96%
Crystal	0	0%
Cyclops	3	5.88%
Voters: 51. You may not vote on this poll

26 February 2007, 05:12 AM	#39
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,319	Guys, guys.... The purpose of this post was to find out which ACTUAL PHYSICAL part of a Rolex you liked.....not its history or background or blah, blah, blah. I just wanted to know what appeals most to you when you actually LOOK at a Rolex. So no point in talking about irrelevant things like history, etc. If we want history, there are watches out there with a far better history than that of Rolex. Let's just talk about the PHYSICAL and appealing aspects of the watch. Thanks - JJ __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

26 February 2007, 11:37 AM	#49
montecristo "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Ken Location: New York Watch: 116234 DateJust Posts: 1,769	got to go with the dial currently, looks much better than my crappy camera skills. __________________ My Rolex reference books collection: The Rolex Report: An Unauthorized Reference Book For The Rolex Enthusiast Rolex Wristwatches: An Unauthorized History (Schiffer Book for Collectors) (Hardcover) Vintage Rolex Sports Models: A Complete Visual Reference & Unauthorized History (Hardcover)

26 February 2007, 01:53 AM	#31
Arturo "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Arturo Location: Pacific Northwest Watch: Black GMT ll Posts: 1,271	It is the amazing combination of all these elements that make for such a strong and perfect watch. Plus the history, and the clear feeling that there is simply ONE PRODUCT in the world that won't change course and sell out to Asia or downgrade. It is the one company that truly manifests excellence, has always had that in its history, and will in generations to come. Changes and improvements will come slowly and only wtih much thought. I am most fascinated by one of the most well deserved trade names in the world.

26 February 2007, 01:57 AM	#32
Dimitris Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Rhodes, Greece Posts: 85	the obssesion with perfection

26 February 2007, 02:09 AM	#33
Alex Stylianou "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: UK Posts: 1,785	The Dial

26 February 2007, 03:07 AM	#35
Solo118 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: USA Watch: Daytona Posts: 6,068	Of these choices on the poll I must say the dial, But theres so much more to love about these watches even if it is physically like the case or movement etc

26 February 2007, 03:19 AM	#36
Chimpy "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Real Name: Ryan Location: New England Watch: Omega AT Posts: 61	For me, it's the bracelet and the name accompanied with the history behind it. I wait tables for a living right now (21, in college) and with my Date on layaway and behind totally obsessed with Rolexes, my tables seem to give me a more generous tip if I've voiced my notice for a great looking Sub or Datejust and get into the story that I'm waiting until I get my first one.

26 February 2007, 10:22 AM	#44
Arturo "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Arturo Location: Pacific Northwest Watch: Black GMT ll Posts: 1,271	OK JJ, what fascinates me the most is the word ROLEX on the front of the dial. That very word on the dial fascinates me the most. It is a powerful word.

26 February 2007, 11:06 AM	#46
Xkalifornian Banned Join Date: Jan 2007 Real Name: Mark Location: Cochise County,AZ Watch: 7016 snowflake Posts: 81	For myself, when I view the simple Submariner/Seadweller as the stainless bracelet flows so elegantly into the deep black of the dial which is impeccably framed by the deep black bezel. We are so used to seeing this standard bearer over the decades on Rolexes as well as the others who have "borrowed" this design. We sometimes don't give it a second thought. It has been and always will be The classic design which all others are compared to. It is a true work of funtional art. And very manly at that.

26 February 2007, 11:26 AM	#48
puffnmo Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 848	For me it's the pure clarity of the design, and the clean lines, perfect edges. Those are a very distinctive Rolex feature, common to every single one I have ever seen. Larry.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)