ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Chris B · 21 October 2008, 07:17 AM

To me the SS PL YM is a Sub & then some, hope I'll always regard it this way

Here's a gratuitous of my son's guys (still dressed), absolutely stunning

taylor · 21 October 2008, 07:19 AM

Regardless of the movement, I just wanted to point out that Jacob rips off Cartier.

"In November 24, 2004 Cartier filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against Arabo [Jacob and Company], claiming he took Cartier watches and added diamonds, then resold them without permission."

Tony-GB · 21 October 2008, 07:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RossInIllinois

For example take a good look at the out going sea dweller and compare it to the new one. The new one is all blinged up. Rolex is wrecking its reputation falling for this trendy blingy flashy look.

Hi Ross

I must respectfully disagree. The new Deep Sea isn't blinged up at all, but pumped up. That is a big difference in my book.

JJ Irani · 21 October 2008, 07:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tony-GB

Hi Ross

I must respectfully disagree. The new Deep Sea isn't blinged up at all, but pumped up. That is a big difference in my book.

Agreed...100%. Definitely bigger and heavier, but no bling at all!!

Tony-GB · 21 October 2008, 07:22 AM

Superb pics Chris B

Chris B · 21 October 2008, 07:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spark

Jacob & Co use quartz movements that's cheap in my book!

I agree,

toph · 21 October 2008, 07:24 AM

The ss/plat is sheer class- i tried it on recently- just so classy and refined i thought. But the clasp was a let down after wearing a GMT IIc and milgauss but hopefully that will be updated soon

JJ Irani · 21 October 2008, 07:24 AM

This is an interesting thread, Tony.....thanks for starting it up!!

redshirt1957 · 21 October 2008, 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RossInIllinois

I call that BLING! comared to the other sport watches Rolex makes. Unfortunately that bling seems to be creeping into all the new models even the poor DateJust. Rolex should change the name of the watch when its re styled to look nothing like the original form and Rappers start lining up to buy them!

For me it's vintage all the way.

But, there is a natural progression that is good; be it life; watches; cars; and such. I embrace change and new design and style for two reasons. Change brings in fresh ideas and new customers to the fold, and; it helps me decide what I like by offering different choices.

shoppy · 21 October 2008, 07:26 AM

Sorry I have to agree with Tony, how is the deep sea blinged? This is a few photos of Markes Deep sea.

Hope you do not mind Marke.

RossInIllinois · 21 October 2008, 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tony-GB

Hi Ross

I must respectfully disagree. The new Deep Sea isn't blinged up at all, but pumped up. That is a big difference in my book.

You say Tomato I say Tomaato........

Tony-GB · 21 October 2008, 07:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by toph

The ss/plat is sheer class- i tried it on recently- just so classy and refined i thought. But the clasp was a let down after wearing a GMT IIc and milgauss but hopefully that will be updated soon

Yes Chris, you are right. The clasp needs to be like a Daytona. After all, the Yacht Master has a triplock crown like the daytona, so why no clasp...?

KJacques · 21 October 2008, 07:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redshirt1957

How about diamonds on the dial?

Boy, that's a head scratcher. A DD or DJ with maybe a black dial looks elegant. But on a Submariner dial?

That makes me cringe.

Tony-GB · 21 October 2008, 07:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

This is an interesting thread, Tony.....thanks for starting it up!!

Cheers JJ!

I just got so p!ssed off when the Yacht Master is referred to as "bling", which to me, cheapens the watch.

Bisquitlips · 21 October 2008, 07:28 AM

This ain't no bling! This is a tool watch!!

Tony-GB · 21 October 2008, 07:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bisquitlips

This ain't no bling! This is a tool watch!!

I hate to say this about anything man made (apart from Catherine Zeta Jones), but that is a beautiful Yacht Master, Richard.

Levelpar1 · 21 October 2008, 07:32 AM

I have a Plat/Stainless Yachtmaster and a GMT IIc. The yachtmaster is a more comfortable watch on my wrist. The case is more rounded and seems to fit my wrist better. I enjoy both watches. The GMT IIc is my daily wearer. The YM is for a dressy look.

I would not consider either of them "Bling"

redshirt1957 · 21 October 2008, 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KJacques

Boy, that's a head scratcher. A DD or DJ with maybe a black dial looks elegant. But on a Submariner dial?

That makes me cringe.

I agree 90%. I have a DJ, Black Dial, Diamonds and you notice the sparkle from the white gold bezel insert before the diamond dial. I also agree with you on diamonds on a SUB, except for a Serti dial. I have a GMT with a Serti dial and I do like the look. Of course the dial is not black and that does make a difference. My question was not a trick question, but with my response I see that you could take it that way. I did know I would get your honest opinion and I like that.

Tony-GB · 21 October 2008, 07:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redshirt1957

I agree 90%. I have a DJ, Black Dial, Diamonds and you notice the sparkle from the white gold bezel insert before the diamond dial. I also agree with you on diamonds on a SUB, except for a Serti dial. I have a GMT with a Serti dial and I do like the look. Of course the dial is not black and that does make a difference. My question was not a trick question, but with my response I see that you could take it that way. I did know I would get your honest opinion and I like that.

Forgive me Bubba, but what's a SERTI dial...?

I know I'm almost up to 1,000, but I'M STILL A NOOB...!!

Tony-GB · 21 October 2008, 07:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Levelpar1

I have a Plat/Stainless Yachtmaster and a GMT IIc. The yachtmaster is a more comfortable watch on my wrist. The case is more rounded and seems to fit my wrist better. I enjoy both watches. The GMT IIc is my daily wearer. The YM is for a dressy look.

I would not consider either of them "Bling"

Thanks Joe

shoppy · 21 October 2008, 07:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Levelpar1

I have a Plat/Stainless Yachtmaster and a GMT IIc. The yachtmaster is a more comfortable watch on my wrist. The case is more rounded and seems to fit my wrist better. I enjoy both watches. The GMT IIc is my daily wearer. The YM is for a dressy look.

I would not consider either of them "Bling"

Get a daytona classp or GMT IIC clap and then you will really be in comfort heaven

RossInIllinois · 21 October 2008, 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bisquitlips

This ain't no bling! This is a tool watch!!

Yes it is a tool watch with a MOP dial!

James T · 21 October 2008, 07:42 AM

bling to me is something with diamonds, so, no i wouldn't call a YM bling...

taylor · 21 October 2008, 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shoppy

Get a daytona classp or GMT IIC clap and then you will really be in comfort heaven

The GMTIIC clasp IS the new daytona clasp

p.s., but I understood your post

taylor · 21 October 2008, 07:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by James T

bling to me is something with diamonds, so, no i wouldn't call a YM bling...

100% agree. By definition, bling=diamonds!

redshirt1957 · 21 October 2008, 07:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tony-GB

Forgive me Bubba, but what's a SERTI dial...?

I know I'm almost up to 1,000, but I'M STILL A NOOB...!!

Top one is my Serti GMT. Diamonds and Rubies.

Bisquitlips · 21 October 2008, 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RossInIllinois

Yes it is a tool watch with a MOP dial!

Just remember where that MOP came from. Some mollusk had to give up it's home for that dial!!

shoppy · 21 October 2008, 07:46 AM

I am not sure bling is diamond, rolex do some very classy diamond dials.

Tony-GB · 21 October 2008, 07:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redshirt1957

Top one is my Serti GMT. Diamonds and Rubies.

Hmmmmm... quite like the Serti, but also like the background!

shoppy · 21 October 2008, 07:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by taylor

The GMTIIC clasp IS the new daytona clasp

p.s., but I understood your post

Yes, I forgot they are in transition.

21 October 2008, 07:22 AM	#35
Tony-GB "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Tony Location: Oxfordshire, UK Watch: 116680 & 116622 Posts: 3,953	Superb pics Chris B __________________ "...why oh why, didn't I take the blue pill...?" http://www.helenanddouglas.org.uk/ www.cheetah.org

21 October 2008, 07:24 AM	#37
toph "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: ChrisTOPHer Location: Sydney Watch: Rolex, Brellum, Posts: 12,601	The ss/plat is sheer class- i tried it on recently- just so classy and refined i thought. But the clasp was a let down after wearing a GMT IIc and milgauss but hopefully that will be updated soon __________________ "Where no counsel is the people fall, but in the multitude of counselors there is safety." Member No.# 11795

21 October 2008, 07:24 AM	#38
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,319	This is an interesting thread, Tony.....thanks for starting it up!! __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

21 October 2008, 07:28 AM	#45
Bisquitlips 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Richard Location: USA Watch: YM Deep Space Posts: 12,515	This ain't no bling! This is a tool watch!! __________________ Rolex Yacht-Master 40mm (SS-YG / Deep Space MOP) 16623 Breitling Aerospace Titanium / 18K with UTC. Omega Speedmaster 3510.50 Oris TT1 Pro Diver Regulator 43MM

21 October 2008, 07:42 AM	#53
James T "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: James Location: SoCal Baby! Watch: submariner 16610 Posts: 860	bling to me is something with diamonds, so, no i wouldn't call a YM bling... __________________ James T

21 October 2008, 07:17 AM	#31
Chris B "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Peterborough Posts: 9,627	To me the SS PL YM is a Sub & then some, hope I'll always regard it this way Here's a gratuitous of my son's guys (still dressed), absolutely stunning

21 October 2008, 07:19 AM	#32
taylor "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: StL Posts: 447	Regardless of the movement, I just wanted to point out that Jacob rips off Cartier. "In November 24, 2004 Cartier filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against Arabo [Jacob and Company], claiming he took Cartier watches and added diamonds, then resold them without permission."

21 October 2008, 07:32 AM	#47
Levelpar1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Real Name: Joe Location: Brandon, FL Posts: 114	I have a Plat/Stainless Yachtmaster and a GMT IIc. The yachtmaster is a more comfortable watch on my wrist. The case is more rounded and seems to fit my wrist better. I enjoy both watches. The GMT IIc is my daily wearer. The YM is for a dressy look. I would not consider either of them "Bling"

21 October 2008, 07:46 AM	#58
shoppy "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Real Name: Simon Location: UK Watch: OP and daytona Posts: 1,778	I am not sure bling is diamond, rolex do some very classy diamond dials. __________________ My family are my life and spirit and strength... Rolex daytona, YMs, OPs Z blue, subs, GMTs, Daydates, Omega Snoopy, chornomaster, apollo 8, ATs, POs, PP, JLC, VC, Swatch ,Casio, Timex.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)