ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
13 August 2020, 10:05 AM | #31 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,011
|
Quote:
The advertised accuracy standard is currently the same for all movements Then there's the elephant in the room with the ongoing situation regarding the new 32xx movements which is bizarre |
|
13 August 2020, 10:42 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: US
Posts: 69
|
I think it's an individual thing. There are some neat movement technology out there, including some that don't require servicing as they are essentially zero friction. Pretty neat stuff. In other cases, the detailing of movements is spectacular and worth the price of admission.
But other than some of the neat technologies or artful detailing, I think the average movement is pretty decent. This is especially true when you own multiple watches. In my experience, my doxa tells time about as well as my expII for how long I wear either watch for a given amount of time. Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk |
13 August 2020, 10:48 AM | #33 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 1,136
|
If a Rolex had a quartz movement it would cost half as much and keep time twice as well.
|
13 August 2020, 11:04 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Real Name: Danny
Location: Charleston WV
Watch: 116622 14060
Posts: 116
|
https://www.acollectedman.com/blogs/...urite-movement
Cool article on watchmakers favorite movements. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.