ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

XavierM · 16 April 2021, 08:28 AM

Really not a big fan of the 15500, case proportions, position of the date window, index/hands shape etc

126613LB for me :)

FORTN · 16 April 2021, 09:51 AM

Both are great watches, but I would go for Royal Oak.

alphadweller · 16 April 2021, 10:09 AM

In the AP I love the dial and the bracelet. I hate the octogonal bezel, the visible screws on it, the angular case shape. In the Bluesy 126613LB, I love everything. Easy choice for me: TT Bluesy, don't want the full gold, I'd flip it if given to me.

Daytonaman799 · 16 April 2021, 10:11 AM

Both are great but the RO just has more...

Boaters · 16 April 2021, 10:33 AM

I really like the sub but in this case have to go with the Royal Oak.

Cagwolf · 16 April 2021, 10:37 AM

AP Royal Oak for me easy choice btw

m3tek44 · 16 April 2021, 10:38 AM

two different watches but AP RO looks beautiful in person!

Ed99 · 16 April 2021, 10:51 AM

Bluesy for sure with the Blue on Gold unique combo that works. Definitely for the value its a win for the Bluesy!!!

Fort Rolex · 16 April 2021, 12:28 PM

Royal Oak (in black, grey, blue, or white) and it’s not close

garyk · 16 April 2021, 12:38 PM

RO is no doubt beautiful and amazing craftsmanship but owning my Bluesy has been fantastic. When I wear it, I can’t take my eyes of the beauty of the blue and gold of it agains the stainless.

steveclr · 16 April 2021, 12:56 PM

AP by a mile, but I don't like two tone.

Emery · 16 April 2021, 01:23 PM

As an occasionally flash piece, you'd want a gold RO, not the steel one.

The steel RO is more a daily watch.

interestedinwatches · 16 April 2021, 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Emery

As an occasionally flash piece, you'd want a gold RO, not the steel one.

The steel RO is more a daily watch.

The way the RO plays with the light, it looks like a disco ball on the wrist. I don't think you need PM to be flashy IMO.

Benzsiam · 16 April 2021, 10:46 PM

Bluesy is very beautiful watch but it’s no comparison to 15500ST.

15500ST is a lot more expensive than Bluesy especially on secondary market.

Bluesy is more reasonable price.

Always get the one that sing to you the most.

minute_man · 16 April 2021, 11:09 PM

Possibly in the minority here. While I have an enormous respect for AP as a manufacture, the design does nothing for me.
I'd pick the LB anytime.

huncho · 16 April 2021, 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minute_man

Possibly in the minority here. While I have an enormous respect for AP as a manufacture, the design does nothing for me.
I'd pick the LB anytime.

i feel like it's a watch that needs to be seen in person because it's not a watch meant to be photographed, but it's definitely a love it or hate it design

mykii · 16 April 2021, 11:40 PM

Royal oak by an infinite margin....

Master_Grogu · 16 April 2021, 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by huncho

i feel like it's a watch that needs to be seen in person because it's not a watch meant to be photographed, but it's definitely a love it or hate it design

It’s truly the bracelet that steals the show IMO.
Wearing one is the sun is like having faceted mirrors that each reflect light in a specific way. Quite beautiful. To be honest, never was a fan of oyster bracelets. Rounded and curved, they remind me of when every piece of digital design had to include some sort of gradient.

Give me sharp, flat reflections anytime!

samson66 · 17 April 2021, 12:05 AM

If buying for flash go with the bluesy

Sent from my Galaxy S20 using Tapatalk

jay_kay · 17 April 2021, 12:09 AM

I had a 15300 years ago and traded it for a 116613 BL worst mistake I ever made. Rectified the situation recently and now have a beautiful 15300 back.

novae500 · 17 April 2021, 12:10 AM

bluesy all the way

Jackie Daytona · 17 April 2021, 01:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by huncho

i feel like it's a watch that needs to be seen in person because it's not a watch meant to be photographed, but it's definitely a love it or hate it design

I do have to say there really is a level of truth to this. I’ve been the same way for years where I never really liked the royal oak line. I saw one in person the other day on a gentleman purchasing a watch at my Rolex AD and it really looks much nicer in person. It kind of has me rethinking my stance on them.

However still as it pertains to the question I’m in the minority that would still rather have the 16613. Even though I do admit the RO is better in person, I still believe the Rolex is a bit more of a durable long term everyday watch with a classic enough design aesthetic that it is a really timeless design.

Yes I realize the RO is a very old design as well and could be deemed classic by many, but just stylistically speaking classically design. The Rolex form and function has really become much of the watch industry design standard.

huncho · 17 April 2021, 01:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dontknow

I do have to say there really is a level of truth to this. I’ve been the same way for years where I never really liked the royal oak line. I saw one in person the other day on a gentleman purchasing a watch at my Rolex AD and it really looks much nicer in person. It kind of has me rethinking my stance on them.

However still as it pertains to the question I’m in the minority that would still rather have the 16613. Even though I do admit the RO is better in person, I still believe the Rolex is a bit more of a durable long term everyday watch with a classic enough design aesthetic that it is a really timeless design.

Yes I realize the RO is a very old design as well and could be deemed classic by many, but just stylistically speaking classically design. The Rolex form and function has really become much of the watch industry design standard.

it's just impossible to photograph the bracelet, it's something that needs to be seen in the flesh and especially when it's under boutique lighting it can make you do a complete 180 on the watch

Jackie Daytona · 17 April 2021, 02:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by huncho

it's just impossible to photograph the bracelet, it's something that needs to be seen in the flesh and especially when it's under boutique lighting it can make you do a complete 180 on the watch

Couldn’t agree more. I never thought I would like them as much as I did in the flesh

T01 · 17 April 2021, 02:47 AM

Royal Oak, that is a stunning piece.

doramas · 17 April 2021, 04:48 AM

No match for the 15500

thesharpe · 17 April 2021, 05:09 AM

AP all the way. Not even close

Spartans71 · 17 April 2021, 05:31 AM

RO 15500, but not blue dial. Black dial with this watch is so much more sleek.

CLTRolex · 17 April 2021, 05:35 AM

RO looks too boxy...I’m not sure how I feel about that

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Chadridv · 17 April 2021, 06:23 AM

Royal Oak!

View Poll Results: Which do you prefer?
Bluesy	97	36.88%
Royal Oak	166	63.12%
Voters: 263. You may not vote on this poll

16 April 2021, 08:28 AM	#31
XavierM "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2019 Location: Paris, France Posts: 388	Really not a big fan of the 15500, case proportions, position of the date window, index/hands shape etc 126613LB for me :) __________________ Instagram: @vert_eternel

16 April 2021, 12:38 PM	#40
garyk 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Gary Location: USA Watch: Daytona Posts: 11,686	RO is no doubt beautiful and amazing craftsmanship but owning my Bluesy has been fantastic. When I wear it, I can’t take my eyes of the beauty of the blue and gold of it agains the stainless. __________________

16 April 2021, 10:46 PM	#44
Benzsiam 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2015 Location: USA Watch: Rolex/AP/PP/ALS Posts: 6,000	Bluesy is very beautiful watch but it’s no comparison to 15500ST. 15500ST is a lot more expensive than Bluesy especially on secondary market. Bluesy is more reasonable price. Always get the one that sing to you the most. __________________ Rolex: 116621, 126333, 126711CHNR, 114060, 116500LN White, 126660 JC, 126710BLNR, 126710BLRO, 116610LV, 126610LN, 126610LV, 116508 YG Green Dial, 124300 Turquoise, 126719BLRO Meteorite dial, 228235 Olive dial ,126755SARU, 116505 RG Black dial, 326934 Blue Sky D. AP: 15451ST Blue, 15500OR w/Bracelet, 14790SA, 14790BA, 26022BC(Salmon) PP: 5524R, 5712G, ALS: Time Zone 136.032, Cartier: WGSA0030, WSSA0061, YG Oct. 2965, Carree 2961, YG Carree, Tank W5000156 Breguet: 7137BA, MontBlanc: 109996"

16 April 2021, 11:40 PM	#47
mykii "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2020 Location: East Watch: AP+FPJ+ PP+Rolex Posts: 1,776	Royal oak by an infinite margin.... __________________

16 April 2021, 09:51 AM	#32
FORTN Banned Join Date: May 2020 Location: US Posts: 120	Both are great watches, but I would go for Royal Oak.

16 April 2021, 10:09 AM	#33
alphadweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2019 Real Name: Vic Location: Spain Watch: SD43 Posts: 6,183	In the AP I love the dial and the bracelet. I hate the octogonal bezel, the visible screws on it, the angular case shape. In the Bluesy 126613LB, I love everything. Easy choice for me: TT Bluesy, don't want the full gold, I'd flip it if given to me.

16 April 2021, 10:11 AM	#34
Daytonaman799 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: NYC/South Fl Watch: Rolex, Patek Posts: 3,678	Both are great but the RO just has more...

16 April 2021, 10:33 AM	#35
Boaters 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2015 Real Name: Mike Location: Pacific Northwest Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD Posts: 10,652	I really like the sub but in this case have to go with the Royal Oak.

16 April 2021, 10:37 AM	#36
Cagwolf "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2018 Location: LA Posts: 149	AP Royal Oak for me easy choice btw

16 April 2021, 10:38 AM	#37
m3tek44 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2019 Location: Bay Area, CA Watch: this Posts: 1,281	two different watches but AP RO looks beautiful in person!

16 April 2021, 10:51 AM	#38
Ed99 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: Toronto MapleLeaf Watch: Submariner Posts: 235	Bluesy for sure with the Blue on Gold unique combo that works. Definitely for the value its a win for the Bluesy!!!

16 April 2021, 12:28 PM	#39
Fort Rolex "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: New Jersey Posts: 586	Royal Oak (in black, grey, blue, or white) and it’s not close

16 April 2021, 12:56 PM	#41
steveclr "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2015 Location: Georgia, USA Watch: 116660 Posts: 498	AP by a mile, but I don't like two tone.

16 April 2021, 01:23 PM	#42
Emery "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2020 Location: Aus Posts: 431	As an occasionally flash piece, you'd want a gold RO, not the steel one. The steel RO is more a daily watch.

16 April 2021, 11:09 PM	#45
minute_man 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2015 Real Name: Basil Location: Athens, GR Watch: BoctokKomandirskie Posts: 2,881	Possibly in the minority here. While I have an enormous respect for AP as a manufacture, the design does nothing for me. I'd pick the LB anytime.

17 April 2021, 12:05 AM	#49
samson66 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Mike Location: Downy Ocean Hon Watch: my money leaving! Posts: 13,712	If buying for flash go with the bluesy Sent from my Galaxy S20 using Tapatalk

17 April 2021, 12:09 AM	#50
jay_kay "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Barrowford Watch: Tudor Black Bay 54 Posts: 1,699	I had a 15300 years ago and traded it for a 116613 BL worst mistake I ever made. Rectified the situation recently and now have a beautiful 15300 back. __________________ Rolex Explorer 214270, Omega Speedmaster '1957 Relaunch' 3594.50.00, Panerai Luminor 1950 PAM00127-E, Panerai Radiomir 1936 PAM00249-I, Panerai Mare Nostrum PAM00716-T, Panerai PAM00785-Q Set, Panerai Luminor Black Seal PAM00594-Q, Panerai Luminor Daylight PAM00604-Q, Tudor Black Bay 54 79000N, Heuer Carrera Re-Edition CS3113, Hamilton Military W10 & TAG Heuer F1

17 April 2021, 12:10 AM	#51
novae500 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: VA Posts: 965	bluesy all the way __________________ 326933 SkyDweller, 126711 GMT II CHNR 12600 DeepSea Seadweller 14060 No Date Submariner 16710 GMT II Pepsi N-Series, Coke F Series

17 April 2021, 02:47 AM	#55
T01 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Real Name: T Location: AZ, NV, CA Posts: 6,489	Royal Oak, that is a stunning piece.

17 April 2021, 04:48 AM	#56
doramas Banned Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: Gran Canaria Posts: 3,469	No match for the 15500

17 April 2021, 05:09 AM	#57
thesharpe "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2020 Real Name: Anthony Sharpe Location: London Watch: 114060, 126711 Posts: 166	AP all the way. Not even close

17 April 2021, 05:31 AM	#58
Spartans71 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2017 Location: Dallas, Texas Posts: 59	RO 15500, but not blue dial. Black dial with this watch is so much more sleek.

17 April 2021, 05:35 AM	#59
CLTRolex "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Real Name: Robert Location: Charlotte/London Watch: Multiple Posts: 889	RO looks too boxy...I’m not sure how I feel about that Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ ♕ Daytona - 116506 ♕ GMT-Master II - 116710BLNR ♕ Yacht-Master II - 116680 ♕ Daytona - 116520 ♕ Explorer II - 16570

17 April 2021, 06:23 AM	#60
Chadridv 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Real Name: Chadri Location: LI, NY Watch: 116610LV Posts: 11,357	Royal Oak! __________________ - i͞n͟s͞t͟a͞g͞r͟a͞m͞ @ⓒⓄⓁⒹⓒⒶⓈⒺⓦⒶⒶⓉⒸⒽⒺⓈ

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)