ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
Today, 03:54 AM | #61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: South Coast UK
Posts: 20
|
I own 2 Tudor date subs a 14060 Sub, BB58 and an Explorer II. In my watch rotation I find the date versions are used more frequently- I like to check the date, like the cyclops and like to hear the date change if I’m up late🙂.
When not in use the no dates are easier to get going as well so they tend to stay off my wrist longer than the date versions. |
Today, 04:01 AM | #62 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2022
Location: Croatia
Posts: 285
|
Over time, I found that my preference is to keep things simple. So, comparing the ND with either Exp2 or GMT II as these are the only ones I have alongside the Sub, the answer is simple...
|
Today, 04:04 AM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2024
Location: Boston
Posts: 18
|
|
Today, 04:55 AM | #64 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: London
Watch: 124060
Posts: 313
|
|
Today, 05:43 AM | #65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: .
Posts: 362
|
In fact the Sub is more popular among watch collectors and afficionados since it is more symmetrical and a diver. As for the Sub Date, it might be more useful for people with the need for such complication or if it is their only watch.
|
Today, 05:49 AM | #66 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 345
|
I think Rolex did a tremendous service by increasing the no-date models when they added the OP line. Prior to, most people had two realistic options - Explorer and sub (one look and model) as the Daytona was relatively expensive and unavailable. I think people are now more accepting of no-date models.
|
Today, 06:46 AM | #67 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 160
|
Was always the Sub for me. Now I have a Sub date and have to say I think I prefer it. It has a little more visual interest and another really useful complication.
|
Today, 07:56 AM | #68 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2024
Location: Boston
Posts: 18
|
That’s only your opinion, as you’re simply calling those with the no date version aficionados and collectors.
|
Today, 08:09 AM | #69 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Ohio
Posts: 305
|
Submariner
|
Today, 09:58 AM | #70 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Jim
Location: Lone Star State
Watch: ...this!
Posts: 186
|
Like em both… If I HAD to choose, it would be a no date.
__________________
114060, 116010lv, 126710BLRO, 126600, 126610, 116600, 8x 5513, 4x 1675, 2x16610, 2x 1680, 16800, 16610LV, 14060M, 16710, 116500, 16803, 5512, 114300, 1016, 116520, x2 6536, 6205 |
Today, 10:33 AM | #71 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 12
|
“No date”
The only sub I like with the date complication is the Starbucks, but it really comes down to personal preference. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 4 (2 members and 2 guests) | |
Funkle , dmash |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.