The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex Reference Library

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18 June 2010, 12:26 PM   #61
Mr. Greene
"TRF" Member
 
Mr. Greene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Jeff
Location: arizona
Watch: Seiko 7A28 7049
Posts: 371
i wish they would put the Rolex back on Bond's wrist, the Omegas are nice but just dont have the level of class befitting Bond.
Mr. Greene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 June 2010, 12:05 AM   #62
jack1024
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Jack
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Posts: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Greene View Post
i wish they would put the Rolex back on Bond's wrist, the Omegas are nice but just dont have the level of class befitting Bond.
You are so right. Only one step above a swiss-army watch. Not at all befitting of an MI6.

jack1024 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 July 2010, 07:30 PM   #63
stuttgart
"TRF" Member
 
stuttgart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Jose, CA
Watch: Rolex, Patek
Posts: 99
Very nice article, thanks for sharing the information.
__________________
DC
stuttgart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2012, 03:27 PM   #64
Xristos
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Chris
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: Subs- various
Posts: 29
I dig the NATO strap.
Xristos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2013, 07:01 AM   #65
Fabrizio
"TRF" Member
 
Fabrizio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Argentina
Posts: 11
I have recently sold my 5508!!! Nice watch!!
Fabrizio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2013, 09:51 AM   #66
WJGESQ
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,753
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Greene View Post
i wish they would put the Rolex back on Bond's wrist, the Omegas are nice but just dont have the level of class befitting Bond.
Yeah, it would be better for his image if he wore the most common watch on the face of the planet.
WJGESQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2013, 09:09 PM   #67
WilliamFoley
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: William Foley
Location: New Yorker, USA
Watch: Timex MF17 (gifted
Posts: 112
Well Rolexe's certainly are the most amazing watches in this world,...they are extremely good to look at and the materials used are just priceless..that is why each watch costs a hell lot of money,,which is insanely high.
WilliamFoley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2013, 07:23 AM   #68
3266
"TRF" Member
 
3266's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Dan
Location: London
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 125
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamFoley View Post
Well Rolexe's certainly are the most amazing watches in this world,...
... Well you should see what Rolex were premiering @ Basel (Mars) 2013 WOW
__________________
“By the way Mr. Bond. That’s a particular handsome wristwatch your wearing, may I see it?” – Mr. BIG AKA Kananga, Live and Let Die (1973)
3266 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 July 2013, 04:43 AM   #69
Tudor Fan
"TRF" Member
 
Tudor Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 983
No wonder the Tudor BB is such a success:
IMG_1734web.jpg
Tudor Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 July 2013, 08:52 PM   #70
WilliamFoley
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: William Foley
Location: New Yorker, USA
Watch: Timex MF17 (gifted
Posts: 112
The Tudors are really amazing watches..mere look on those watches can tell the excellence of these watches..these need no appreciation..it will be an insult to them..
WilliamFoley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 August 2013, 01:45 AM   #71
Armyguy03
"TRF" Member
 
Armyguy03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: DM[V]
Watch: 16710 | 16600
Posts: 3,546
Excellent review. I think I will only wear my Sub (2 Liner) on a NATO for now on. Appropriate size though
__________________
Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Armyguy03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2013, 03:29 AM   #72
submariner66
"TRF" Member
 
submariner66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: John
Location: New Jersey
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,139
Really interesting. Larry, why were the seiko's used for that long time period? And which models were used? Any pics of them from films?
submariner66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2013, 09:29 PM   #73
JB7
"TRF" Member
 
JB7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: London
Posts: 221
Quote:
Originally Posted by WJGESQ View Post
Yeah, it would be better for his image if he wore the most common watch on the face of the planet.
Rolex would never stump up the cash influx that Omega does to get the Sub in the films, so it won't happen.... as we all know!

Just how long can we linger over this shot of Bond's watch?
How much are they paying?
WOW, a good few seconds then!

JB7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2013, 08:21 PM   #74
adzman808
"TRF" Member
 
adzman808's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Porto and the UK
Watch: 114060
Posts: 176
hopefully not a silly question.... but....

people talk about the true Bond sub being the 6538 (or 6200) but in the movies Bond's watch clearly has no individual minute markers on the bezel, where as all the shots I see of the 6538 do, so how is this the true Bond Sub?
adzman808 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2013, 04:22 AM   #75
MAJSmith
"TRF" Member
 
MAJSmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Virginia
Posts: 154
Here is the James Bond 6538. Maybe its just the lighting or maybe the bezel without markers was optional. Someone will correct me if I'm wrong.

[IMG][/IMG]
MAJSmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2013, 11:46 AM   #76
xplorerIIman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Braselton,GA
Watch: Rolex Explorer II
Posts: 3
Very interesting thread!!!
xplorerIIman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 August 2013, 11:06 AM   #77
007Sub
"TRF" Member
 
007Sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Greg
Location: USA
Watch: Milsub
Posts: 1,635
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Greene View Post
i wish they would put the Rolex back on Bond's wrist, the Omegas are nice but just dont have the level of class befitting Bond.
Agreed! You know that ian Flemming actually wrote Rolex into the script whereas Omega has to pay for the endorsement...
__________________

@true_patina
@true.dome
007Sub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 August 2013, 02:12 PM   #78
WilliamFoley
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: William Foley
Location: New Yorker, USA
Watch: Timex MF17 (gifted
Posts: 112
I didn't knew Pierce Bros-nan in all of his 4 bond movies wore an Omega..now i gotta go watch them all over again.
WilliamFoley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 August 2013, 03:18 AM   #79
JB7
"TRF" Member
 
JB7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: London
Posts: 221
Quote:
Originally Posted by 007Sub View Post
Agreed! You know that ian Flemming actually wrote Rolex into the script whereas Omega has to pay for the endorsement...
That's what I said, but Fleming wrote the books, not the film scripts. Producers discretion. If stories are to be believed, Connery didn't wear a watch, and noticing this, the Rolex you see him wear in the first film was Cubby's.
JB7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 August 2013, 07:18 AM   #80
adzman808
"TRF" Member
 
adzman808's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Porto and the UK
Watch: 114060
Posts: 176
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPTSmith View Post
Here is the James Bond 6538. Maybe its just the lighting or maybe the bezel without markers was optional. Someone will correct me if I'm wrong.

[IMG][/IMG]
it ALMOST looks more like a turn o graph than a sub....
adzman808 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 August 2013, 09:43 AM   #81
Jkidd41011
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: John
Location: Cincinnati
Watch: Datejust 16234
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Greene View Post
i wish they would put the Rolex back on Bond's wrist, the Omegas are nice but just dont have the level of class befitting Bond.
He spent the extra money on the Tom Ford suits.
Jkidd41011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 August 2013, 03:57 PM   #82
WilliamFoley
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: William Foley
Location: New Yorker, USA
Watch: Timex MF17 (gifted
Posts: 112
The Rolex always looked better on Bond..don't know why they switched to Omega.
WilliamFoley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 August 2013, 11:39 PM   #83
Jkidd41011
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: John
Location: Cincinnati
Watch: Datejust 16234
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamFoley View Post
The Rolex always looked better on Bond..don't know why they switched to Omega.
Same reason they show him drinking a Heineken.....$$$$$$$$

Do you think Rolex would create a watch with 007 on it?

First movie I remember a high end manufacturer paying for product placement was Mercedes Benz in "the Firm". In the book....Tom Cuise's character gets a BMW as a perk....not a MB. Shortly thereafter....Bond is driving a Bimmer.
Jkidd41011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2013, 03:22 AM   #84
Trurolexer
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
Awesome post, Larry.
Trurolexer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2013, 02:16 AM   #85
Nycturbovr6
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 7,630
Great post
Nycturbovr6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2013, 11:13 PM   #86
unclesallie
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
unclesallie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: dan
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: keystone pocket
Posts: 5,917
Larry: I may have seen this thread a long time ago, not sure. But I just reviewed it again, and it is a knock-out. Classic. Amazing. I think we all know the answer to "what do you do in your spare time."
unclesallie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 September 2013, 08:48 AM   #87
MZMTL
"TRF" Member
 
MZMTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Toronto
Watch: GMT 116710LN
Posts: 2
Bond needs some revamping....

Hi All -

As a Bond enthusiast (I have seen all the movies numerous times, read the books and memorized more than I would like to admit) I must say that the decisions that the new generations of Bond directors and producers has directly taken away from all that made a good Bond flick. Gadgets, one liners, and babes are all being overlooked for a darker reality based Bond, and even though I think Daniel Craig is excellent for the role I miss the nuances that made the Connery flicks so Iconic.

Omega paid their way to get the screen time but nothing beats the old Rolly on 007's wrist. Let's hope that they realize that there is still a huge following of Bond lovers who grew up on the films that would like to see some of the old iconic features of a Bond put back into the new genre of Bond movies.

Do you expect me to talk.....No Mr.Bond...I expect you to die!

Cheers all!
MZMTL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 January 2014, 03:41 AM   #88
steve53mg
"TRF" Member
 
steve53mg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: New York
Posts: 36
Back in 1965, my dad bought me a Sub in Luzerne, for a $106.00. I believe he bought it at Bucherer, because, during the same trip, he bought himself a Bucherer gold dress watch with a mesh band. My Rolex was the smaller case...i guess it would be safe to call it a "James Bond". I remember clearly, at the time, In the U.S., Rolex was selling this smaller watch, which they referred to as 17 jewels, for $175.00 and the larger case with the crown protectors, which they referred to as 23 jewels, for $210.00.
I never had any luck with the watch; it always ran slow...lost a minute or more a day, and I used to send it back to Rolex in NYC every couple of years, to no avail. They finally told me that they no longer would be able to service it, it had too much wear and parts were scarce. Needless to say, this was very disappointing! I eventually found a guy off of 5th ave in NYC, named Don Laviano, who was able to get it to run reasonably well, but only for a short time. It languished in my drawer until about 1990 when I sold it for $400. I wish that I had it now!!
steve53mg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2014, 02:38 PM   #89
MAJSmith
"TRF" Member
 
MAJSmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Virginia
Posts: 154
Quote:
Originally Posted by MZMTL View Post
Hi All -

As a Bond enthusiast (I have seen all the movies numerous times, read the books and memorized more than I would like to admit) I must say that the decisions that the new generations of Bond directors and producers has directly taken away from all that made a good Bond flick. Gadgets, one liners, and babes are all being overlooked for a darker reality based Bond, and even though I think Daniel Craig is excellent for the role I miss the nuances that made the Connery flicks so Iconic.

Omega paid their way to get the screen time but nothing beats the old Rolly on 007's wrist. Let's hope that they realize that there is still a huge following of Bond lovers who grew up on the films that would like to see some of the old iconic features of a Bond put back into the new genre of Bond movies.

Do you expect me to talk.....No Mr.Bond...I expect you to die!

Cheers all!

I agree to an extent, but I like the direction Bond is headed. We were just introduced to Moneypenny, M, and Q, plus they (officially) brought back the PPK, so maybe in the future we'll see a return to the nuances you spoke of and finally be able to stray from the Omegas Pierce Brosnan introduced.
MAJSmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 March 2014, 12:18 PM   #90
Uncleray
"TRF" Member
 
Uncleray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: JFK
Location: Massachusetts
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 14
Really interesting, Thanks!
Uncleray is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal

WatchesOff5th


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.