The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Ω Omega Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 August 2021, 06:05 AM   #61
Mifune
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: here AND there...
Posts: 2,240
321 thread...
Mifune is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2021, 06:13 AM   #62
fdm79
"TRF" Member
 
fdm79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Norway
Posts: 931
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mifune View Post
321 thread...
Title says it's a Pictorial, not an exclusive thread...
But you still can go cry to moderation, little man
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 126710 BLRO - Rolex Submariner 116610 LV - Breitling Navitimer 01 Pan-American Bronze Limited Edition AB0121C4/Q605-447A - Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional 3861 (Sapphire) 310.30.42.50.01.002 - Omega Seamaster Diver 300M 41mm Ceramic (Blue) 212.30.41.20.03.001
fdm79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2021, 10:41 PM   #63
ratty
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Graham
Location: UK
Watch: Daytonas and Subs
Posts: 2,787
Quote:
Originally Posted by fdm79 View Post
Title says it's a Pictorial, not an exclusive thread...
But you still can go cry to moderation, little man
Actually I was thinking the same thing as Mifune, so are you going to call me something as well?
ratty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2021, 10:49 PM   #64
fdm79
"TRF" Member
 
fdm79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Norway
Posts: 931
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratty View Post
Actually I was thinking the same thing as Mifune, so are you going to call me something as well?
Couldn't care less of what you think...
The only one that has a saying on this is the OP...
I wasn't "hijacking" his thread. I really complimented his 321. I posted pictures of my 3861 because I very recently bought it and as a happy new Speedy owner, wanted to share. That's all. His thread title says (Speedmaster 321 Pictorial), which means he is telling a story about his watch with pictures, in case you don't know. Last I checked it doesn't say "The absolute 321 exclusive owners thread". Go check any other Rolex thread here where people simply post picture of their own (many times different) models over and over when a specific model is mentioned. 98% of TRF members usually don't whine about it so if you feel hurt, offended or got your "safe space" invaded, please jump to some other threads or feel free to make a formal complaint to moderation, FBI, CIA, Care Bears, Teletubbies, etc. IF THEY (moderators or OP) say something otherwise, I'll take into consideration. Not you or your homie.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 126710 BLRO - Rolex Submariner 116610 LV - Breitling Navitimer 01 Pan-American Bronze Limited Edition AB0121C4/Q605-447A - Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional 3861 (Sapphire) 310.30.42.50.01.002 - Omega Seamaster Diver 300M 41mm Ceramic (Blue) 212.30.41.20.03.001
fdm79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2021, 11:41 PM   #65
Travelller
2024 Pledge Member
 
Travelller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: VIE
Watch: my sig. ;)
Posts: 3,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratty View Post
So, can you compare it's accuracy when worn to that of another of your Speedmasters?
It's just as accurate as my SMPs all which (I assume) won't be as accurate as the new 3861-equipped references. I expect on average +5~10s/d with any of them


Quote:
Originally Posted by fdm79 View Post
The Ed White version is absolutely fabulous !!! Every single detail is perfection ...I have finally joined the club with my brand new Moonwatch Sapphire 3861 ...*
Congratulations & wear in good health


* p.s. My thread is actually a review thread of the 321; I prefer the word "Pictorial" because a formal "review" requires more info & preferably long-term results in terms of "wear comfort", "accuracy" etc. Hence while it's "no biggie", I was (also) surprised you went into detail about your 3861 but more importantly, always happy when the 321 gets a compliment from a fellow member


__________________
Traveller - Genève * Melbourne * Miami * Wien
Breitling AVI 765r Navitimer 806r
Omega 3572.50 SM300MC Speedy Tuesday Caliber 321
Panerai 111 217 233
Rolex 16600 126600
Seiko SBGA125 SBDX001 SLA017 SLA025 SLA033
Tudor 5B GMT
Zénith A386ME
Other Mühle Glashütte S.A.R. Flieger Chronoswiss Tora
Travelller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2021, 11:48 PM   #66
fdm79
"TRF" Member
 
fdm79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Norway
Posts: 931
Quote:
Originally Posted by Travelller View Post
It's just as accurate as my SMPs all which (I assume) won't be as accurate as the new 3861-equipped references. I expect on average +5~10s/d with any of them


Congratulations & wear in good health


* p.s. My thread is actually a review thread of the 321; I prefer the word "Pictorial" because a formal "review" requires more info & preferably long-term results in terms of "wear comfort", "accuracy" etc. Hence while it's "no biggie", I was (also) surprised you went into detail about your 3861 but more importantly, always happy when the 321 gets a compliment from a fellow member


Thank you !!
Sorry for the fuss (which wasn't started by me BTW). Too many bitter people here...
From my understanding, your thread really wasn't a "Exclusive Caliber Speedmaster 321 owners thread". As you said, I understood the thread as your personal adventure and story regarding your 321 model. Also a very nice in depth review.
I love the 321 but unfortunately (maybe fortunately ) it's pretty hard to get one.
The reason I mentioned my 3861 is because I bought it this past Friday and got very enthusiastic about it so I wanted to share among Speedy and Omega lovers.

And once again, congrats on your fantastic watch !!
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 126710 BLRO - Rolex Submariner 116610 LV - Breitling Navitimer 01 Pan-American Bronze Limited Edition AB0121C4/Q605-447A - Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional 3861 (Sapphire) 310.30.42.50.01.002 - Omega Seamaster Diver 300M 41mm Ceramic (Blue) 212.30.41.20.03.001
fdm79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2021, 01:02 AM   #67
Travelller
2024 Pledge Member
 
Travelller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: VIE
Watch: my sig. ;)
Posts: 3,090
Been a while since I "doublewristed*" ...

*But only for the pic - one watch is usually enough...

__________________
Traveller - Genève * Melbourne * Miami * Wien
Breitling AVI 765r Navitimer 806r
Omega 3572.50 SM300MC Speedy Tuesday Caliber 321
Panerai 111 217 233
Rolex 16600 126600
Seiko SBGA125 SBDX001 SLA017 SLA025 SLA033
Tudor 5B GMT
Zénith A386ME
Other Mühle Glashütte S.A.R. Flieger Chronoswiss Tora
Travelller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2021, 03:13 AM   #68
214270Explorer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: United States
Watch: me buy Watches
Posts: 3,955
Thank you for the tremendous effort you put into creating this marvelous post.

This type of material is the main reason many of us are here at TRF.
__________________
The display of actual intelligence terrifies much of mankind

Rolex "some"
Tudor "some"
Damasko "some"
Misc Pieces "some"
Marathon "some"
GS Spring Drive "some"
Hamilton "some"
Findeisen "some"
214270Explorer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2021, 12:08 PM   #69
Travelller
2024 Pledge Member
 
Travelller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: VIE
Watch: my sig. ;)
Posts: 3,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by 214270Explorer View Post
Thank you for the tremendous effort you put into creating this marvelous post.

This type of material is the main reason many of us are here at TRF.
Sir, many thanks for your kind words - makes all the effort I put into such a post worthwhile
__________________
Traveller - Genève * Melbourne * Miami * Wien
Breitling AVI 765r Navitimer 806r
Omega 3572.50 SM300MC Speedy Tuesday Caliber 321
Panerai 111 217 233
Rolex 16600 126600
Seiko SBGA125 SBDX001 SLA017 SLA025 SLA033
Tudor 5B GMT
Zénith A386ME
Other Mühle Glashütte S.A.R. Flieger Chronoswiss Tora
Travelller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 October 2021, 07:05 PM   #70
ratty
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Graham
Location: UK
Watch: Daytonas and Subs
Posts: 2,787
The more I look at this and other posts about the 321 the more I feel I need to have another look at this watch!
ratty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 03:23 AM   #71
Stevec14
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Real Name: Steve
Location: U.K.
Watch: 321, Snoopy 3
Posts: 4,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratty View Post
The more I look at this and other posts about the 321 the more I feel I need to have another look at this watch!
I think you should. Honestly, if I had to go down to one watch (maybe a gshock aside) this would be it. I really think it’s that good. Plus it looks great on leather etc so you can switch it up a bit.
Stevec14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 08:55 AM   #72
NardinNut
2024 Pledge Member
 
NardinNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Jordan
Location: Proxima b
Posts: 1,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stevec14 View Post
I think you should. Honestly, if I had to go down to one watch (maybe a gshock aside) this would be it. I really think it’s that good. Plus it looks great on leather etc so you can switch it up a bit.

Yep it’s a total strap monster, like most Speedmasters. Love mine. Only two issues I have with it is:
-the bracelet is very difficult to get over my hand in the most comfortable wrist size. I’ve never had that problem with a watch. Wish it had micro adjustments just to get it over my hand more comfortably.
- the accuracy of the movement is disappointing but then again I wasn’t expecting COSC. Still, kind of a bummer for this price point.

With that said, completely agree with the one watch statement. It’s not only an amazing watch but one I feel has more “soul” vs any other watch I’ve owned. Sure it’s all in my head but that feeling of wearing something so special and historic is one of the reasons I love it.
NardinNut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 11:05 AM   #73
Aconitase
"TRF" Member
 
Aconitase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: NJ
Watch: VC, Omega, GS, MG
Posts: 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by NardinNut View Post
Yep it’s a total strap monster, like most Speedmasters. Love mine. Only two issues I have with it is:
-the bracelet is very difficult to get over my hand in the most comfortable wrist size. I’ve never had that problem with a watch. Wish it had micro adjustments just to get it over my hand more comfortably.
- the accuracy of the movement is disappointing but then again I wasn’t expecting COSC. Still, kind of a bummer for this price point.

With that said, completely agree with the one watch statement. It’s not only an amazing watch but one I feel has more “soul” vs any other watch I’ve owned. Sure it’s all in my head but that feeling of wearing something so special and historic is one of the reasons I love it.

I had the exact same problem as you with getting the watch over my hand. In the event you haven't tried it yet, try putting the watch on with your palm facing up and thumb tucked in, as if you were going to have the watch on the other side of your wrist. Once the watch has cleared your wrist, simply spin it around.

If you've tried this already, then please excuse me.
Aconitase is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 04:24 PM   #74
Stevec14
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Real Name: Steve
Location: U.K.
Watch: 321, Snoopy 3
Posts: 4,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by NardinNut View Post
Yep it’s a total strap monster, like most Speedmasters. Love mine. Only two issues I have with it is:
-the bracelet is very difficult to get over my hand in the most comfortable wrist size. I’ve never had that problem with a watch. Wish it had micro adjustments just to get it over my hand more comfortably.
- the accuracy of the movement is disappointing but then again I wasn’t expecting COSC. Still, kind of a bummer for this price point.

With that said, completely agree with the one watch statement. It’s not only an amazing watch but one I feel has more “soul” vs any other watch I’ve owned. Sure it’s all in my head but that feeling of wearing something so special and historic is one of the reasons I love it.
I have the same issue. I think it’s due to the small clasp but it is a pain. One of the downsides of omega making the clasp as small as possible I guess, but it’s not too bad overall.

I completely agree with you on the last bit btw. I’m no particular space fan but this watch has more character than any I’ve owned. I’ve owned a ceramic Daytona previously and would buy this again all day. That’s not saying it’s a better watch than a Daytona before i get flamed (it’s a different watch) but this does more for me that that ever did.

It’s one of those that needs to be seen and experienced as on some bare facts you could deem it overpriced. Following 7 months of ownership, I think it’s worth every penny of its MRSP and am delighted to have one.
Stevec14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 05:17 PM   #75
ratty
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Graham
Location: UK
Watch: Daytonas and Subs
Posts: 2,787
Quote:
Originally Posted by NardinNut View Post
Yep it’s a total strap monster, like most Speedmasters. Love mine. Only two issues I have with it is:
-the bracelet is very difficult to get over my hand in the most comfortable wrist size. I’ve never had that problem with a watch. Wish it had micro adjustments just to get it over my hand more comfortably.
- the accuracy of the movement is disappointing but then again I wasn’t expecting COSC. Still, kind of a bummer for this price point.

With that said, completely agree with the one watch statement. It’s not only an amazing watch but one I feel has more “soul” vs any other watch I’ve owned. Sure it’s all in my head but that feeling of wearing something so special and historic is one of the reasons I love it.
So how inaccurate are you finding it?
ratty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 06:18 PM   #76
ratty
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Graham
Location: UK
Watch: Daytonas and Subs
Posts: 2,787
Actually, I’ll ask that question to all 321 owners. How accurate are you finding the watch?
ratty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2021, 08:55 AM   #77
NardinNut
2024 Pledge Member
 
NardinNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Jordan
Location: Proxima b
Posts: 1,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratty View Post
Actually, I’ll ask that question to all 321 owners. How accurate are you finding the watch?

Mines at +18 spd
NardinNut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2021, 02:13 PM   #78
BendyBee
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 206
I have not measured mine. Not buying it for accuracy. Mostly for the history and beauty of the 321.

Sent from my SM-N985F using Tapatalk
BendyBee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2021, 06:21 PM   #79
ratty
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Graham
Location: UK
Watch: Daytonas and Subs
Posts: 2,787
Quote:
Originally Posted by NardinNut View Post
Mines at +18 spd

Thanks for your reply, I’m surprised that it’s this far out!
ratty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2021, 06:23 PM   #80
ratty
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Graham
Location: UK
Watch: Daytonas and Subs
Posts: 2,787
Quote:
Originally Posted by BendyBee View Post
I have not measured mine. Not buying it for accuracy. Mostly for the history and beauty of the 321.

Sent from my SM-N985F using Tapatalk

Your watch looks really good.

I’m finding it noticeable how many people who have bought a new 321 have put it on a strap. I think it looks better on a strap than on the bracelet.
ratty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2021, 11:21 AM   #81
Travelller
2024 Pledge Member
 
Travelller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: VIE
Watch: my sig. ;)
Posts: 3,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by NardinNut View Post
...
-the bracelet is very difficult to get over my hand in the most comfortable wrist size. I’ve never had that problem with a watch. Wish it had micro adjustments just to get it over my hand more comfortably.
...
Ditto - I didn't notice the problem when I wrote the OP, but then Summer rolled around and one time when trying to remove it, I thought I was going to "pre-stretch" the damn bracelet...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aconitase View Post
I had the exact same problem as you with getting the watch over my hand. In the event you haven't tried it yet, try putting the watch on with your palm facing up and thumb tucked in, as if you were going to have the watch on the other side of your wrist. Once the watch has cleared your wrist, simply spin it around...
Bingo - I figured out this "trick" by chance and now use it for a few of my tighter bracelets

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stevec14 View Post
I have the same issue. I think it’s due to the small clasp but it is a pain. One of the downsides of omega making the clasp as small as possible I guess, but it’s not too bad overall.
I can't say the same for the (former) production bracelet which never gave me problems in winter or Summer. The 321 Bracelet, as you noted, must have an extra-small clasp. No other explanation that I can come up with...

Quote:
Originally Posted by ratty View Post
Actually, I’ll ask that question to all 321 owners. How accurate are you finding the watch?
I answered your original accuracy question already some months ago (see above) but I think it's worth reiterating that accuracy is NOT the 321's biggest selling point...

to all

__________________
Traveller - Genève * Melbourne * Miami * Wien
Breitling AVI 765r Navitimer 806r
Omega 3572.50 SM300MC Speedy Tuesday Caliber 321
Panerai 111 217 233
Rolex 16600 126600
Seiko SBGA125 SBDX001 SLA017 SLA025 SLA033
Tudor 5B GMT
Zénith A386ME
Other Mühle Glashütte S.A.R. Flieger Chronoswiss Tora
Travelller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2021, 01:39 PM   #82
BendyBee
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 206
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratty View Post
Your watch looks really good.

I’m finding it noticeable how many people who have bought a new 321 have put it on a strap. I think it looks better on a strap than on the bracelet.
Thanks. It's super handsome on straps. But the flatlink is something else though. I like it as much as the straps which is usually my preference for all of my watches.
BendyBee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 January 2022, 10:49 AM   #83
Travelller
2024 Pledge Member
 
Travelller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: VIE
Watch: my sig. ;)
Posts: 3,090
FWIW, this is my IG annual 2021 "grid" chock-full of 321EW goodness



__________________
Traveller - Genève * Melbourne * Miami * Wien
Breitling AVI 765r Navitimer 806r
Omega 3572.50 SM300MC Speedy Tuesday Caliber 321
Panerai 111 217 233
Rolex 16600 126600
Seiko SBGA125 SBDX001 SLA017 SLA025 SLA033
Tudor 5B GMT
Zénith A386ME
Other Mühle Glashütte S.A.R. Flieger Chronoswiss Tora
Travelller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 January 2022, 12:21 PM   #84
Onequik135i
"TRF" Member
 
Onequik135i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tampa, Florida
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,549
Are these newer 321 movements rated at COSC?
__________________
16750 / 116610LV / 116613LB / Ed White 321 / PAM111 / PAM170
Onequik135i is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 4 January 2022, 12:48 PM   #85
Travelller
2024 Pledge Member
 
Travelller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: VIE
Watch: my sig. ;)
Posts: 3,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onequik135i View Post
Are these newer 321 movements rated at COSC?
There is no official certificate issued with the Caliber 321s. As for accuracy, I can only speak about my own, which averages +7 in all positions except for Crown-Down which runs at -8. Not within COSC iirc, but it works out in the end as when it's ahead more than 30s I simply store it overnight in the CD position.

As I noted in my OP, if you want improved accuracy, a 3861-equipped reference is the way to go. That the 321 is reasonably accurate is more than I expected.

On a side note, I was amazed to find out that running the chronograph (complication) has little impact on the accuracy or amplitude. My (new) El Primero 400 is much more impacted, running 2~3s slower (than without the chronograph running) and taking a pretty strong hit in amplitude.

__________________
Traveller - Genève * Melbourne * Miami * Wien
Breitling AVI 765r Navitimer 806r
Omega 3572.50 SM300MC Speedy Tuesday Caliber 321
Panerai 111 217 233
Rolex 16600 126600
Seiko SBGA125 SBDX001 SLA017 SLA025 SLA033
Tudor 5B GMT
Zénith A386ME
Other Mühle Glashütte S.A.R. Flieger Chronoswiss Tora
Travelller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 January 2022, 01:59 PM   #86
Trog
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Great White North
Posts: 696
3 2 1 blast-off
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 321EWr.jpg (256.5 KB, 261 views)
Trog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2022, 07:05 AM   #87
Mifune
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: here AND there...
Posts: 2,240
Anyone else notice the new GOLD version of the 321 on the Omega website?



Speedmaster 321 Canopus Gold

I am waiting for someone to tell me that they own a moonshine and a canopus gold 321
Mifune is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2022, 07:07 AM   #88
texasmade
"TRF" Member
 
texasmade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Real Name: Robert
Location: Lone Star State
Watch: AP RO 15400, FOIS
Posts: 2,377
Yes, along with the eye watering price.
texasmade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2022, 11:30 AM   #89
Travelller
2024 Pledge Member
 
Travelller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: VIE
Watch: my sig. ;)
Posts: 3,090
Sticking with steel, don't need my 321 wrapped in "Jamaican gold"
A great 1st #SpeedyTuesday of 2022 all the same



__________________
Traveller - Genève * Melbourne * Miami * Wien
Breitling AVI 765r Navitimer 806r
Omega 3572.50 SM300MC Speedy Tuesday Caliber 321
Panerai 111 217 233
Rolex 16600 126600
Seiko SBGA125 SBDX001 SLA017 SLA025 SLA033
Tudor 5B GMT
Zénith A386ME
Other Mühle Glashütte S.A.R. Flieger Chronoswiss Tora
Travelller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2022, 04:22 PM   #90
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,407
Still waiting for delivery, this watch is being produced at a snails pace.
__________________
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.