ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
23 February 2022, 07:47 PM | #91 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,659
|
|
23 February 2022, 08:13 PM | #92 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,980
|
What's even worst is the fools who believe all this rare Mk stuff.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
23 February 2022, 08:33 PM | #93 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Geneva
Posts: 166
|
I believe in differences and i even pay an extra for them. Owning 4 16610 LV they are all different. 2 "flat 4" early F Series 2003/2004 the one with a Bertolli green bezel, the other with a darker green. The first rehaut engraved as a random serial one from 2011 - and yes, i appreciate this differences/nuances and it makes absolutely sense as collector! As we all agree for the 16610 LV that there are differences in the bezel and dials - i dont understand why it shouldnt be the same with the 126710 BLRO?! Its obvious that the ones from the first half year of production in 2018 have a different color than the ones from today or in between - sure or you have to be blind! Asked which one will be the most collectable its for sure the MK1 from 2018! And yes, i never would buy a Rolex without papers and a clear (service) history!
|
23 February 2022, 08:47 PM | #94 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,905
|
Quote:
Not to accept the 126710 BLRO bezel inserts colour differences, which are FACTS, one has to be either blind, a fool, or both. If a collector is ready to pay for that is a totally different question, but to neglect the existence is just content-free social media bla bla. It is also trivial to understand that one can NOT ask an AD or RSC to purchase a specific Mk 1,2,3,4… You will get what they have in stock. |
|
23 February 2022, 09:25 PM | #95 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 2,874
|
As I've said before I 100% agree you can't walk into an AD, or speak to Rolex, and ask for a Mk 1 or Mk 2 BLRO bezel insert. However, that doesn't mean that they don't exist, and I'm sorry but I just don't buy the argument that it's all down to variations in the firing process.
To suggest that would mean that Rolex's QC is absolutely non-existent on the colour of BLRO bezels. We all know Rolex's QC isn't to the Kool-Aid-drinking levels that some believe it is, but I don't think "near enough is good enough" or "yeah, that'll do" is something Rolex would apply to the production of arguably its most iconic GMT bezel. Occam's Razor would suggest that it's far more likely that as time has gone on, Rolex have simply got better at the process and have tweaked the colours - possibly in response to the "blurple/pink" comments from watch enthusiasts, or just from their own desire to more closely match the colours of the 16710 BLRO. I don't know why the idea that the process has been improved over time is so outlandish to some. |
23 February 2022, 09:31 PM | #96 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Middle East
Posts: 1,808
|
I think the issue with the "mk" Pepsis is that they probably very hard to tell which ones they are unless you're comparing side by side with another model. To me that's not the intention or idea behind a 'mark'. As somebody that's colour blind it's also extremely hard to tell even when side by side.
Example - a Flat 4 16610LV. You know straight away what it is. Same with 'APH', 'swiss only' or the 'mark' dials of the vintage Subs. They are generally distinguishable by specific features rather than slightly different shades. I can understand this for the vintage Subs which were often made in very small numbers and had obvious intentional changes. Today's landscape is totally different though. Production back then was significantly lower than it is now and it just seems like trying to label 'marks' against specific modern pieces is an attempt to either sell something for more, or for grey dealers to make these mass produced watches more rare than they actually are. Or maybe owners are just more desperate for the 'rare' term to be used on something they have. More curious though is why we don't see 'marks' against many 5 digit models. There are clear differences with some of the 16610 models for example. Although saying that 'swiss only' seems to be gaining more traction. In reality, the rarity of these things will only be known way down the line when collectors are looking for them. |
23 February 2022, 10:01 PM | #97 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2021
Real Name: Montemayor
Location: Madrid
Posts: 425
|
Quote:
Sell it now on Chrono for $45,000. I am sure many here will buy it. .
__________________
You never actually own a Rolex. Eventually your son inherits your place on the waiting list. |
|
23 February 2022, 10:03 PM | #98 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2021
Real Name: Montemayor
Location: Madrid
Posts: 425
|
Quote:
A fool and a lot of his money will soon be parted. .
__________________
You never actually own a Rolex. Eventually your son inherits your place on the waiting list. |
|
23 February 2022, 10:58 PM | #99 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: AJ
Location: USA
Watch: Swiss
Posts: 5,233
|
Quote:
Purple Pepsi Owners rejoice! |
|
24 February 2022, 01:49 AM | #100 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2021
Real Name: Clark Kent
Location: Earth
Watch: Didn't found yet
Posts: 41
|
me 2
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.