The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Patek Philippe Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 3 October 2016, 11:42 AM   #91
texex91
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by jon_jon View Post
Is the blue dial of this Anniversary model the same deep blue dial color of the 5980/1AR? That would be a nice colored dial matched with an all WG case and bracelet. LE quantity of 1300 is a good number, the same as the 5575. However I don't think it will be quite as popular as the 5575.

I don't think the price is unreasonable though as it is in line with the 5980/1R pricing.

So what will the other Anniversary piece be like?
Ooooofffff...1300. Not exactly an LE IMHO.
texex91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2016, 11:43 AM   #92
conkers
"TRF" Member
 
conkers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Roger
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 6,109
Not quite the blue dial 5990p I wanted but at least a blue dial!
conkers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2016, 11:44 AM   #93
Andrés G
"TRF" Member
 
Andrés G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Guatemala
Posts: 3,392
You were right, Paul. I'm disappointed.
Andrés G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2016, 11:52 AM   #94
martinr
"TRF" Member
 
martinr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California
Posts: 3,106
How many ways are there to mess up a 5980 blue dial?
martinr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2016, 11:55 AM   #95
texex91
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
Okay--who's excited for 50th Anniversary
texex91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2016, 11:56 AM   #96
Robert993
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: California
Posts: 126
5976g.
Robert993 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2016, 12:00 PM   #97
jon_jon
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 4,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by texex91 View Post
Ooooofffff...1300. Not exactly an LE IMHO.
I agree that 1300 is a fairly large number. If you are a true collector and want exclusivity, you would want Patek to release only 30 pieces and not 1300. If that were the case, distribution would only be via the Geneva Salon and maybe a couple of pieces going to Paris and London. However that policy would alienate the 400+ ADs that would feel left out of the 40th Anniversary of the Nautilus.

With a 1300 production number, each AD should receive at least a couple of pieces, assuming they have the customer base to support the watch. For ADs that are located in economically depressed areas, I can see some having difficulty moving a ~$100K USD watch, whether it is a special Anniversary piece or not.
jon_jon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2016, 12:03 PM   #98
jschmidtdmd
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: John
Location: Denver
Posts: 2,294
I was hoping they would have put the date the watch was sold on the dial as well.
__________________
Watches!
jschmidtdmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2016, 12:03 PM   #99
texex91
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by jon_jon View Post
I agree that 1300 is a fairly large number. If you are a true collector and want exclusivity, you would want Patek to release only 30 pieces and not 1300. If that were the case, distribution would only be via the Geneva Salon and maybe a couple of pieces going to Paris and London. However that policy would alienate the 400+ ADs that would feel left out of the 40th Anniversary of the Nautilus.

With a 1300 production number, each AD should receive at least a couple of pieces, assuming they have the customer base to support the watch. I can imagine some ADs are located in economically depressed areas where it is not always easy to move a watch listed at close to $100K USD, whether it is a special Anniversary piece or not.
$117M PP payday on sellout.

I wish them luck and congrats to future owners...there will be plenty.
texex91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2016, 12:04 PM   #100
WAK4
2024 Pledge Member
 
WAK4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Bill
Location: NJ
Watch: Always changing
Posts: 4,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by texex91 View Post
Okay--who's excited for 50th Anniversary
Better get a thread started!
WAK4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2016, 12:05 PM   #101
texex91
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by WAK4 View Post
Better get a thread started!
Or Lapince could start an incoming
texex91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2016, 12:06 PM   #102
jschmidtdmd
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: John
Location: Denver
Posts: 2,294
I think these incomings should be outlined in a spread sheet with google alerts on a shared calander.

Don't want to miss one
__________________
Watches!
jschmidtdmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2016, 12:11 PM   #103
martinr
"TRF" Member
 
martinr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California
Posts: 3,106
I'd like to see the back. Same 5980 movement?
martinr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2016, 12:16 PM   #104
texex91
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by martinr View Post
I'd like to see the back. Same 5980 movement?
They had 1300 left over...
texex91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2016, 12:20 PM   #105
martinr
"TRF" Member
 
martinr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California
Posts: 3,106
Quote:
Originally Posted by texex91 View Post
They had 1300 left over...
It's 49.3 wide compared to 43 for a 5711 and the date looks closer to the middle and the diamond next to it makes it like a AP 15400 compared to the 15202
martinr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2016, 12:23 PM   #106
ARNON
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Noni
Location: Area 51
Posts: 18
IMG_6437.jpg

Compare !
__________________
ARNON is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2016, 12:26 PM   #107
martinr
"TRF" Member
 
martinr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California
Posts: 3,106
Compare ![/QUOTE]

SS and platinum. Are they for the 40th?
martinr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2016, 12:31 PM   #108
jenniferjanef
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,828
Is it me or is that 5980/1G in a 5990 case?? The bezel looks like those on 5990?

£70k that's great value buy considering the additional diamonds n LE compared to 5980/1R at similar price. Anyone know what's the MSRP for 5980/1R in £?
jenniferjanef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2016, 12:35 PM   #109
martinr
"TRF" Member
 
martinr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California
Posts: 3,106
Quote:
Originally Posted by jenniferjanef View Post
Is it me or is that 5980/1G in a 5990 case?? The bezel looks like those on 5990?
Similar but the new case is even bigger than the 5990
martinr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2016, 12:40 PM   #110
kneedeep
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Not 2 far from u
Posts: 3,457
Short course in how to ruin an iconic watch dial by embossing the anniversary year and date range into it.
kneedeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2016, 12:41 PM   #111
KarlS
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Karl
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 5,228
Someone else can be number 1
KarlS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2016, 01:03 PM   #112
FeelingTheBlues
"TRF" Member
 
FeelingTheBlues's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Carl
Location: Always moving
Watch: If you wish...
Posts: 22,039
Wow...that's disappointing indeed.

No offense meant to anyone who likes it, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. However, I am really bummed to see that they would celebrate an anniversary of the Nautilus with a model like that. Whatever happened to keeping things simple?

Quote:
Originally Posted by texex91 View Post
Ooooofffff...1300. Not exactly an LE IMHO.
Well if they really stop at 1300 watches and move on I will consider it limited still. Is it impressive and really exclusive? Not if you think that it's still 1300 out of 50 000 pieces per year (unless I am not up to date with my numbers) but that's a different story.
__________________
Mon corps c'est un pays en guerre sur l'point d'finir,
Le général de l'armée de terre s'attend au pire,
J'ai faim, j'ai frette, je suis trop faible pour me lever debout,
On va hisser le drapeau blanc un point c'est tout.


- André Fortin
FeelingTheBlues is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2016, 01:07 PM   #113
Samui
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 611
I don't like the years engraved on the dial. Otherwise its not a bad looking watch I like it.
Samui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2016, 01:21 PM   #114
KarlS
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Karl
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 5,228
Don't lose hope. Still one more
KarlS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2016, 01:40 PM   #115
ADPATEK
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: 5712/1A & 116520
Posts: 5
Breaking News!

http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article...rsary-nautilus
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Screen Shot 2016-10-02 at 8.36.04 PM.jpg (35.8 KB, 339 views)
ADPATEK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2016, 01:58 PM   #116
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,476
For me it would be worth considering if it were chrono only without date.

Also agree 1300 is not an LE imho.
__________________
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2016, 02:01 PM   #117
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,476
Quote:
Originally Posted by jenniferjanef View Post
Is it me or is that 5980/1G in a 5990 case?? The bezel looks like those on 5990?

£70k that's great value buy considering the additional diamonds n LE compared to 5980/1R at similar price. Anyone know what's the MSRP for 5980/1R in £?
Agree appears to be 5990 case.
__________________
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2016, 02:18 PM   #118
tom2517
"TRF" Member
 
tom2517's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Asia & US
Posts: 1,551
The 1976 writing and the size? I don't know, it's a bit too much. Never a big fan of the Aquanaut and the Nautilus series and this one surely won't change my mind.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_4956.jpg (51.2 KB, 516 views)
tom2517 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2016, 02:24 PM   #119
RedGlasses
"TRF" Member
 
RedGlasses's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Europe
Posts: 124
49 mm!!!! + diamonds... + 1300 LE. After 2 years of anticipation? uh
Patek please!! stop the massacre
RedGlasses is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2016, 03:18 PM   #120
PJ S
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
Quote:
Originally Posted by texex91 View Post
But the diamond markers may be a little much.
Stupidity reigns at Stern Towers!
Everyone (should) knows that a Diamond anniversary is 60 years, not 40 – which is Ruby.

Agreed on the engraving on the dial – tacky in the extreme, especially given the price point.
PJ S is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.