The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Today, 09:33 AM   #121
ocb
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2024
Location: Boston
Posts: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
Nonsense.

Rolex markets one as a Submariner and the other as a Submariner Date - that is what they are, not what you think makes sense.
Every single Sub, except the no date, has a date so that is the one that needs the further description. Ever heard someone say they got a full yellow gold Sub Date?

Common sense logic is not nonsense

Also, as I previously stated, Submariner sits by itself on the dial on all models. The description is oyster perpetual date, features apart from the model itself.

On the site it would be wrong to describe one a No Date because categories generally describe features and not the lack of.

In real parlance though saying the qualifier no date makes sense because it needs to be said far less often, a small fraction of the time.

Finally, both models are absolutely just Subs.
ocb is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (1 members and 1 guests)
Hamm

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.