Sub date vs no-date

[effovex]

You can’t go wrong with either Sub or Sub Date.

However, what is more important to YOU?

-History? (Sub came first)
-Prestige? (Sub date is more premium)
-Rarity? (Sub date is more common)
-Aesthetics? (Sub is more symmetrical in looks)
-Ease? (Sub easier to set since no date)
-Usefulness? (Sub date since it tells date)
-Discreteness? (Sub date with Cyclops more recognized as Rolex)

[ROLEX MAN]

Originally Posted by effovex

You can’t go wrong with either Sub or Sub Date.

However, what is more important to YOU?

-History? (Sub came first)
-Prestige? (Sub date is more premium)
-Rarity? (Sub date is more common)
-Aesthetics? (Sub is more symmetrical in looks)
-Ease? (Sub easier to set since no date)
-Usefulness? (Sub date since it tells date)
-Discreteness? (Sub date with Cyclops more recognized as Rolex)

YOU nailed it PERFECTLY!

[kieselguhr]

Submariner if you go for black bezel.
Submariner date if you’re not scared of colors.

[Krash]

Originally Posted by ROLEX MAN

YOU nailed it PERFECTLY!

That looks great. I still think the 114060 might be the greatest watch ever.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk