The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 3 April 2007, 04:18 AM   #1
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
SD waterproof rating of 4000 ft. WHY?

Okay guys,

Here are a few obvious questions coming your way...please answer them as best you can. Thanks!!

1. What is the maximum depth a professional trained diver can go down to with the usual breathing apparatus, but only wearing a normal dive suit?

2. What is the maximum depth a professional trained diver can go down to with a special extra thick diving suit and the huge metal helmet on top?

3. Whatever the depth, I'm pretty sure no human being on earth can get anywhere even close to 4,000 ft without being crushed like a tin can. So why this enormous depth rating on the SD when it can never be actually WORN by any man to that depth?

Cheers - JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2007, 04:23 AM   #2
cbrenthus
"TRF" Member
 
cbrenthus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Brandon
Location: FL
Watch: ing my second hand
Posts: 869
Well, seeing as how you didn't specify that the diver needed to return alive, I would say the answer to #1 and #2 is ~36000 feet (the Challenger Deep; the deepest part of the ocean)

Therefore the answer to #3 is "That's the best Rolex can do!







Seriously, I don't really know.
cbrenthus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2007, 04:23 AM   #3
Gaijin
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Gaijin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Japan
Watch: ing your back.
Posts: 16,179
In case you are diving and it slips off of your wrist. Then if some oceanographers are looking for parts of the Titanic or something with a remote controlled robot sub and if they find it on the ocean bottom and can retrieve it they have a functioning watch.

Last edited by Gaijin; 3 April 2007 at 08:27 AM..
Gaijin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2007, 04:29 AM   #4
madformac
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Real Name: Justin
Location: Manchester, UK.
Posts: 708
I think we are looking at this the wrong way.

The SD can withstand the pressure to 4000ft but what we need to ask is can it withstand the pressure of being on JJ's wrist?

Its only a matter of time before it becomes worried about heading on down to flipper land...
madformac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2007, 04:31 AM   #5
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Okay, you tossers, you've had your laughs (as usual)....now how about some serious answers?
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2007, 04:34 AM   #6
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
Pffft! A measly 4000 ft.! Get a real watch and then talk to me!
If only I could get it under a shirt cuff.

mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2007, 04:40 AM   #7
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike View Post
Pffft! A measly 4000 ft.! Get a real watch and then talk to me!
If only I could get it under a shirt cuff.

You too, Mike? At least I expected a serious reply from you!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2007, 04:48 AM   #8
worktolivelife
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,365
I'd actually be interested in any knowledgeable replies,did Rolex create this tool watch specifically to meet specs for this depth rating, or did they "just" produce it then tested it till it blew-up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!,

steve
__________________
MEMBER NO.142
worktolivelife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2007, 04:49 AM   #9
worktolivelife
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,365
well crushed actually i guess
__________________
MEMBER NO.142
worktolivelife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2007, 04:50 AM   #10
worktolivelife
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,365
imploded you get the picture
__________________
MEMBER NO.142
worktolivelife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2007, 04:52 AM   #11
worktolivelife
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,365
HE valve would save it does that become ineffective below 4000ft
__________________
MEMBER NO.142
worktolivelife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2007, 04:55 AM   #12
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by worktolivelife View Post
HE valve would save it does that become ineffective below 4000ft
The He valve is useless and ineffective in water. It's only designed to release the excess He gas that the diver breathes when confined inside a diving bell or a bathyscape. The He gas is very microscopic in size and can get into the watch and blow out the crystal with excess pressure.

But you fellas are missing the whole point of this thread. My question is why have a watch which can take all the pressures of 4000 ft. when the person wearing it CANNOT!!!!!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2007, 04:57 AM   #13
worktolivelife
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,365
one more of my thoughts, its just the waterproof rating right so is the actual watch effected in a dry enviroment pressure chamber etc
__________________
MEMBER NO.142
worktolivelife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2007, 05:06 AM   #14
cbrenthus
"TRF" Member
 
cbrenthus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Brandon
Location: FL
Watch: ing my second hand
Posts: 869
Found these to be interesting:

http://www.themercury.co.za/index.ph...icleId=2555327

http://www.mediacen.navy.mil/pubs/al...jun00/pg14.htm
cbrenthus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2007, 05:11 AM   #15
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbrenthus View Post
Thanks, my friend....very interesting links....especially the second one. Would need the SD for that one...and still have 2000 ft. to spare.

Cheers - JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2007, 05:46 AM   #16
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
Ok, I'm not a diver so I have to defer to those that are, but my guess (and it's only that) is the depth rating was an out growth of the improved HE valve that came out on the reference 16660. This, along with the thicker case and saphire crystal led to the greater depth rating.

Lot's of information here under COMEX,

http://www.doubleredseadweller.com/
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2007, 05:53 AM   #17
langejl
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: new york, usa
Posts: 51
Very interesting. I was thinking the samething about the rating. Guess it is for the brag'ing rights.
langejl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2007, 06:00 AM   #18
Russel
Member
 
Russel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: California
Watch: Submariner, GMT II
Posts: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
Okay guys,

Here are a few obvious questions coming your way...please answer them as best you can. Thanks!!

1. What is the maximum depth a professional trained diver can go down to with the usual breathing apparatus, but only wearing a normal dive suit?

2. What is the maximum depth a professional trained diver can go down to with a special extra thick diving suit and the huge metal helmet on top?

3. Whatever the depth, I'm pretty sure no human being on earth can get anywhere even close to 4,000 ft without being crushed like a tin can. So why this enormous depth rating on the SD when it can never be actually WORN by any man to that depth?

Cheers - JJ
A couple of thoughts...

The first, in my opinion, is that Rolex makes a watch with that rating because people want it, or like it. Yes JJ, that means you! (and Me!)

Second thought: The rating is for 4,000 ft static water pressure. I wonder what pressure the seals may see if diving into water head first from 20ft? Or taking a spill water sking?
Russel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2007, 06:05 AM   #19
Russel
Member
 
Russel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: California
Watch: Submariner, GMT II
Posts: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
... So why this enormous depth rating on the SD when it can never be actually WORN by any man to that depth?...
Well, that's not entirely true, I would say why this enormous depth rating on the SD when it can never be actually WORN by any man _alive_ to that depth?...

Russel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2007, 06:12 AM   #20
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russel View Post
Second thought: The rating is for 4,000 ft static water pressure. I wonder what pressure the seals may see if diving into water head first from 20ft? Or taking a spill water sking?
I don't think that really matters with the SD. I'm pretty sure that if the SD were somehow strapped onto a deep diving submersible and plunged straight down to 4000 feet, nothing would happen to the watch.

In fact, someone once posted an interesting thread with fantastic pics of an SD actually undergoing this treatment....and coming back up in full working order!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2007, 08:38 AM   #21
sevykor
"TRF" Member
 
sevykor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 465
So that Rolex can say they "did it". How many other watch brands can make that claim and prove it. Kind of like swimming the English Channel one cold October 7th day in 1927 and proving Rolex superiority(myth or fact???). Yeh babe, Who's you Daddy!
sevykor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2007, 10:26 AM   #22
jackson
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: singapore
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
The He valve is useless and ineffective in water. It's only designed to release the excess He gas that the diver breathes when confined inside a diving bell or a bathyscape. The He gas is very microscopic in size and can get into the watch and blow out the crystal with excess pressure.

But you fellas are missing the whole point of this thread. My question is why have a watch which can take all the pressures of 4000 ft. when the person wearing it CANNOT!!!!!!
I suppose that is a marketing ploy? with real good qualities that we will have no need for.
jackson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2007, 10:40 AM   #23
montecristo
"TRF" Member
 
montecristo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Ken
Location: New York
Watch: 116234 DateJust
Posts: 1,769
Between the SD and the IWC, I am still wanting that IWC aquatimer, with 2000m rating.

http://www.time2watch.net/IWChome.htm

Not that I will ever go beyond 50M, but for the gimmick factor.
montecristo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2007, 10:53 AM   #24
Ragu
"TRF" Member
 
Ragu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Ragu Sauce
Location: Southern, FL
Watch: the Sauce ;)
Posts: 781
JJ,
I don't think you'll have to worry too much if your SD will survive a 4K' dive my friend.

First thing you'll have to do is learn to "swim" without the use of your "water wings".

Then you'll be able to go deeper than your 2 foot inflatable above ground backyard pool.
__________________
"Waiting is so time consuming" -- Unknown

Proud Member #2391
Ragu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2007, 11:59 AM   #25
Flyjet601
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: All of them
Posts: 2,789
Why the rating to 4000 ft....so they can charge more for it.

...and the plan seems to be working doesnt it.
Flyjet601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2007, 11:59 AM   #26
leopardprey
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Chad
Location: Around the world
Watch: Panerai 233
Posts: 4,204
AS for ratings, how about the GP SeaHawk Pro rated to 3000meters!

I do know that about the deepest recreational dive I ever did was about 150 feet deep. Anything over 90 feet is considered a "Deep" dive.

One of the guys I worked with was a diver in the Navy and then later a commercial diver. The deepest he ever went was 350 feet. That was in a special suit and breathing some weird gas mixture.
leopardprey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2007, 12:03 PM   #27
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ragu View Post
JJ,
I don't think you'll have to worry too much if your SD will survive a 4K' dive my friend.

First thing you'll have to do is learn to "swim" without the use of your "water wings".

Then you'll be able to go deeper than your 2 foot inflatable above ground backyard pool.
Ragu....you're a bloody tosser!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2007, 12:07 PM   #28
nko51
"TRF" Member
 
nko51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Alex
Location: USA
Watch: TT Blue Sub
Posts: 2,542
I think the reason for the 4000' depth rating is for that special someone who may find themselves suddenly wearing cement block shoes and being thrown overboard.
__________________
nko51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2007, 12:19 PM   #29
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by nko51 View Post
I think the reason for the 4000' depth rating is for that special someone who may find themselves suddenly wearing cement block shoes and being thrown overboard.
Provided the "hoods" who throw him overboard still have the grace to allow him to keep his SD on!!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2007, 12:24 PM   #30
cbrenthus
"TRF" Member
 
cbrenthus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Brandon
Location: FL
Watch: ing my second hand
Posts: 869
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
Provided the "hoods" who throw him overboard still have the grace to allow him to keep his SD on!!!

Oh come on! Like anyone who would get thrown overboard wearing cement shoes would ever be seen wearing a watch with any stainless steel in it. Now if the SD cam in YG, that would be another matter!
cbrenthus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.