ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: What is the maximum price you would pay for a gold (including gold bracelet) Rolex? | |||
$35,000 (current RRP) | 15 | 16.67% | |
$30,000 | 17 | 18.89% | |
$27,500 | 23 | 25.56% | |
$25,000 | 35 | 38.89% | |
Voters: 90. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
18 September 2018, 03:48 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 457
|
Gold Pricing: Poll and Experiment
I've recently started considering a move into PM models, and have a question that I wanted to run by other members of the forum. A full gold model, including bracelet, runs for about $25,000 more than its counterpart in SS, which ends up being about 3x as much. Obviously, the value of the gold in these watches isn't worth that much -- my guess is $5,000 at the very most. Now, I understand that Rolex isn't going to just charge an extra $5,000 (or whatever the true value is) for a gold model, but it seems to me that the markup is excessive.
Personally, I would absolutely buy gold watches if they were priced in the $25,000 range, which would still be a very large markup relative to the price of the gold. I could stomach paying two times as much as I would for the comparable steel model, but can't justify the 3X (closer to 3.5X, actually) premium that there is now. Are there a lot of people in the same camp as me? I can't help but wonder if Rolex would actually make more money if they dropped the price of these models. Let's run through the (admittedly very simplified) math assuming revenue to Rolex is 60% of RRP: Current: $35,000 RRP = $21,000 in revenue Scenario 1: $30,000 RRP = $18,000 in revenue --> if sales increase 16.7% or more, revenue is at least as big as it currently is Scenario 2: $27,500 RRP = $16,500 in revenue --> if sales increase 27.3% or more, revenue is at least as big as it currently is Scenario 3: $25,000 RRP = $15,000 in revenue --> if sales increase 40% or more, revenue is at least as big as it currently is To see if these theory holds any water at all, let's conduct a poll. My prediction is that the optimal price is $27,500, but let's see! EDIT: A lot of people are saying the cost of materials is irrelevant to the price, and I actually agree with that, for the most part. I'm talking more about willingness to pay, which, depending on the person, may or may not be related to the price of the gold itself.
__________________
Instagram: @watchadmiral |
18 September 2018, 04:00 AM | #2 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,663
|
How can you possibly justify a SS Rolex with 1 $ worth of steel in it ?
Compared to that any gold rolex is a bargain
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711. |
18 September 2018, 04:13 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Vince
Location: Michigan
Posts: 547
|
I like your mind game, but would like to believe that Rolex did the due diligence (supply and demand and competitors and positioning and everything)?
__________________
Have a nice day! |
18 September 2018, 04:19 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: Larry
Location: Finger Lakes
Posts: 6,007
|
I don't think the average person makes luxury purchases via such math. I know I don't.
|
18 September 2018, 04:24 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: North Carolina
Watch: 214270/116710BLNR
Posts: 813
|
I'm not sure if I understand what you're saying. You're using the term revenue but you mean profit I think?
Anyway, it's no secret that the margins on Rolex PM models are significantly higher than SS models. That's why they don't mind if the stainless models are in a shortage if it helps them move PM ones. I don't think dropping the price would help the bottom line. People are still buying PM models (Rolex sells more PM Datejusts than anything else). For those of us who don't care about gold, a 30-40% reduction in price will NOT change our minds and make us want to buy PM.
__________________
214270 | 116710BLNR |
18 September 2018, 04:33 AM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 20,762
|
At least 25% off MSRP. Have gotten ~33% off on a special order DD40.
__________________
__________________ Love timepieces and want to become a Watchmaker? Rolex has a sensational school. www.RolexWatchmakingTrainingCenter.com/ Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory. |
18 September 2018, 04:38 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 6,544
|
If it’s purly the cost of material then a ss model shouldn’t be more fun $1000
It’s the price of luxury!!
__________________
Wear the watch you like, not the one they tell you to wear! |
18 September 2018, 04:39 AM | #8 | ||||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 457
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You could be right, and you probably are. However, I'm willing to bet (and the early results of the poll are agreeing with me) that there are a solid amount of people who like gold watches, but can't stomach buying one when they could have the steel version of the same model for 30% of the price.
__________________
Instagram: @watchadmiral |
||||
18 September 2018, 04:45 AM | #9 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New England
Posts: 3,719
|
I did not vote in this poll. The cost of materials is irreverent to the cost of these watches. PM costs so much more because of the perceived value against stainless.... whatever the cost, Rolex has the strategy correct because I see a lot of SS buyers on the forum making posts about “stepping up to PM” due to the ss shortage.
__________________
Current watches: 116718ln, 116500 black dial, 40mm Breitling Chronomat MOP dial “A man with one watch always knows what time it is. A man with two watches is never sure.” |
18 September 2018, 04:48 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Here
Posts: 5,606
|
The markup on a gold Rolex is actually not excessive. I challenge you to buy a solid gold bar and make a Day-Date or a Submariner out of it. To put things into perspective look at solid gold models from AP and PP and their MSRP and a DD or Sub or GMT looks real affordable in solid gold. Besides, how much value of stainless steel do you think is in a Sub, GMT, Daytona or what have you?
|
18 September 2018, 04:52 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,405
|
Depends on the model but you have to have at least one gold watch
|
18 September 2018, 04:52 AM | #12 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: nyc
Posts: 6,655
|
25-30% off the price of retail+tax is ideal for me
|
18 September 2018, 05:01 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Nathan
Location: Denver, CO
Watch: Too many
Posts: 1,008
|
I don't think I'd even pay the lowest of the choices. In fact, I didn't.
|
18 September 2018, 05:45 AM | #14 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,469
|
Gold is good
|
18 September 2018, 05:50 AM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: North Carolina
Watch: 214270/116710BLNR
Posts: 813
|
Quote:
The poll should be, for those of you who have NOT bought a PM piece and WILL NOT buy a PM piece, would you buy one instead if the price was X% cheaper? Lots of people are already buying them at the current price so of course they'd be more likely to buy if the prices were lower. What you're asking if how many NEW customers would dropping the price secure. I didn't answer because there's no option for "I would not buy a PM piece regardless of the price."
__________________
214270 | 116710BLNR |
|
18 September 2018, 06:03 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 457
|
Quote:
I want to include the people who have already bought one or would buy one at current prices, as then I can (really, really roughly) estimate the percentage increase in demand at the lower prices. For example, if 10 people said they'd be willing to pay $35,000 for one and 4 people said they wouldn't be willing to pay more than $30,000, then there would be a 40% increase in demand if the price was dropped to $30,000. The way you suggest setting it up, all I would know is that 4 people would buy one if the price were dropped to $30,000, which doesn't say much without a comparison.
__________________
Instagram: @watchadmiral |
|
18 September 2018, 06:06 AM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,367
|
So if we say $35K is this retail, probably the majority of buyers were paying this, not even thinking of asking for a discount, while WIS and the chancers probably would want 20-25% off so I'd say the average discount would be 10% off. But this was before the tightening, so now that would be halved again so around 5%. If you are getting more off you are doing better than most, and this is working for Rolex who are selling PMs faster than ever before.
|
18 September 2018, 06:13 AM | #18 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,379
|
Look what a 18k Submariner sold for 25 years ago and see what it sells for now. It’s almost the same price today. Compare the same time line with a SS Submariner.
__________________
|
18 September 2018, 06:26 AM | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: New Zealand
Watch: 114060
Posts: 2,630
|
Where is the none of the above option? The prices are all too high.
I don't like gold watches, but that has nothing to do with the price. I prefer steel or well done titanium. |
18 September 2018, 07:06 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,641
|
Gold Pricing: Poll and Experiment
There are probably a lot more conversion costs with gold manufacture than SS to build into the COGS.
Additional security for one.
__________________
“My tastes are simple; I am easily satisfied with the best.” ― Winston S. Churchill |
18 September 2018, 07:26 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Louisiana
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,678
|
$$ does not really matter.. And the price for luxury item does not need to make any sense. Again you will buy it.
R Millar stated that that whatever he makes, no matter the price, it always sells.. |
18 September 2018, 09:54 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,920
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.