![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Ecuador
Posts: 23
|
Ro vs roc
Hi, and about to get a new watch, which you guy think it is more good looking, considering both are about the same price
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 3,812
|
Are these the actual watches? I wouldn't get this particular ROC, but look for one that has not been touched by some random dude with a polishing wheel. Can't tell what the state of the black dial RO is from the picture.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: B.
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 3,506
|
This looks like 26320 vs 15500. My .02 having owned both, I am not a fan of the empty dial on the 15500 and optically makes it look less proportionate. I prefer the 26320 with the chrono pushers, or a 15400 over the aforementioned and will save you a few dollars.
__________________
Richard Mille RG RM030 || Richard Mille RM72ti || AP 26240 50TH Green Royal Oak Chrono || AP Royal Oak Off Shore Gulf Blue 26238 || AP Royal Oak Blue JUMBO SS 15202ST || AP ROO Diver Green 15720ST || ♕ Rolex Platinum Daytona Diamond 116506 || Cartier Santos |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Posts: 4,366
|
Yeah, looks like funky polishing job on the case and bezel.
I personally like 26320 (even sub dials) > 26331 ROC > 15500 RO. But I have a chrono addiction, so weight opinion accordingly. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: East
Watch: AP + PP + Rolex
Posts: 1,775
|
I'm not a chrono person but when I selected my AP I requested the ROC - the plain ROs are just too much dial for me (unless in 37mm or a 39mm jumbo). Plus, under a microscope, the chrono subdials look incredible (didn't even know they were also pantograph engraved, or even there, without fine magnification).
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Ecuador
Posts: 23
|
Yes, those are the watches, another opcións are the skydeller ss Or yacht master 42 Wg, but I have few rolex, I was looking forward to an AP
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Uranus
Watch: 116500LN
Posts: 4,768
|
Btwn these 2 id go with the roc
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 3,812
|
Below is a picture of an untouched ROC - the sharp transitions between the bezel facets and between the bezel side and top (as well as many of the other surfaces) are one of the defining features - the picture isn't great, but look at the upper left corner of the bezel. I'd take a few scratches on an untouched watch over one where the transitions are rounded off every day. I'd keep searching.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: HK
Watch: Piaget,Rolex,AP,HB
Posts: 1,040
|
If going for the Chrono, go for the newer iterations with the "Panda" sundials, ie. contrasting
Overall I also agree the 15400 is too plain, I had a blue dial and didn't get much wrist time |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.