ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

cshecks · 28 January 2010, 06:08 PM

I do not yet have a rolex, but, soon will. THe only models I have ever been interested in are the subs and exp's. I think the rest of the collection is a bit dainty for my tastes. Anyhoo.......... I am very partial to the current 16610. I do not like the maxi dial or case one bit and I dislike the LV even more.

Which do you prefer just based on aesthetics?

Fredke · 28 January 2010, 06:36 PM

So do I. Exept I also like the GMT Master model, but my target is the Submariner 16610. Beside these models, I am not crazy about Rolex, but it is a matter of taste...
Now, to be honest, with the Internet pictures I don't see the difference between the 16610 and the 116610, exept with the close up on the besel ingraved with "rolexrolexrolex". Aniway, I'll probably choose a "used" one.

Big_S · 28 January 2010, 08:05 PM

The explorer II since it has a 24 hour bezel. The GMT II is nice as well, but with the PCL's, I agree it is a bit "dainty". I have no use for a rotating bezel, so the sub is out.

Psmith · 28 January 2010, 08:14 PM

Tough call... the 16610 is a bona fide design classic, but I like the updates as well as the greater heft. Can't go wrong if you get what you like best

Cheers

Tombstone · 28 January 2010, 09:08 PM

The Sub family has a little for each taste. The old Sea Dweller was perfect. The Sub no date is old school tradition. The LV Sub is cool (if your into green) I love the ability to switch the bezel to black on the LV. The standard Sub, nice The Rolex classic. TT Sub blue or black for dress and for those who love the TT look. You can't go wrong with a Sub pick what you like and post photos as well, good luck.

newsman · 29 January 2010, 01:04 PM

The new, larger (41mm) Datejusts II are hardly dainty!

sakuraba · 29 January 2010, 02:51 PM

I love all Rolexes that don't have PCLs

Seriously, the only watch the PCLs look good on are the Milgausses IMHO.

As for the Subs, the most comfortable for my wrist is still the 16610. I really am not looking forward to the new ceramic sub, but the discontinuance of the current sub line can only be good for my 16610.

sea-dweller · 29 January 2010, 03:05 PM

Aesthetics - Sub Date, Explorer 1, GMT II and Daytona...

Tools · 29 January 2010, 03:09 PM

I don't care for the block cases...

I would like to get my hands on a few of those Glidelock clasps though.....

MikeyTX · 29 January 2010, 03:15 PM

I prefer the simplicity of the no date sub. It is the safest Rolex to wear on a daily basis. No bling. No one really notices it.

dman · 29 January 2010, 03:18 PM

If by dainty you mean wears small, the explorer 2 because of the fixed bezel wears small. Especially compared to the 16610.

Jason71 · 29 January 2010, 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeyTX

I prefer the simplicity of the no date sub. It is the safest Rolex to wear on a daily basis. No bling. No one really notices it.

My everyday watch.

mwag · 29 January 2010, 05:10 PM

Not really a fan of the maxi dial to be honest and the case just looks a bit weird for me. Still a good looking watch though, just wouldn't want to wear it over my older subs.

cshecks · 29 January 2010, 05:19 PM

I am in the process of trying to locate a 16610 and am having a bit of difficulty, I am attempting to buy new. One dealer in my area has 'hoarded' his few remaining 16610's....super annoying. Guess I will have to try BB as much as i prefer not to buy through them.

DarkHorse · 29 January 2010, 06:04 PM

16610 is a classic, can't go wrong

MikeyTX · 29 January 2010, 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cshecks

I am in the process of trying to locate a 16610 and am having a bit of difficulty, I am attempting to buy new. One dealer in my area has 'hoarded' his few remaining 16610's....super annoying. Guess I will have to try BB as much as i prefer not to buy through them.

Have you asked David, Oscar or, Greg here on our forum to locate one for you ?

MikeyTX · 29 January 2010, 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cshecks

I am in the process of trying to locate a 16610 and am having a bit of difficulty, I am attempting to buy new. One dealer in my area has 'hoarded' his few remaining 16610's....super annoying. Guess I will have to try BB as much as i prefer not to buy through them.

David SW has one. Just sent you the link by p/m. Here it is again. http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=111972

rickyslam · 29 January 2010, 06:18 PM

I love the 16610. It is my first Rolex out of my three. The only thing I want on it is the green bezel. I don't like the maxi dial, it looks too busy and doesn't seem elegant. That's my $0.02.

WatchTimes · 30 January 2010, 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tools

I don't care for the block cases...

I would like to get my hands on a few of those Glidelock clasps though.....

X2 I have to agree 100%

The GMT Master · 30 January 2010, 12:10 AM

Well, having owned a Rolex with a new style clasp, I won't go back to the old style ones, and as such, the current 16610 doesn't interest me. Can't wait for the updated model

HDHNTER · 30 January 2010, 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tools

I don't care for the block cases...

I would like to get my hands on a few of those Glidelock clasps though.....

+1

MURRAY · 30 January 2010, 01:37 AM

The new ones are nice...the old ones are nice....personal preference...

kcmo · 30 January 2010, 01:49 AM

Overall I prefer the 'old' style...can't go wrong with a 16610, or 16613, or 14060M, etc...

I do really like the new TT black Sub though...I think it's the white writing and datewheel that I prefer on this model over the 'old' style.

warrior · 30 January 2010, 02:17 AM

I prefer the older style... though i prefer the old dial, i can live with the maxi dial on the new ones....

but the blocky cases ( as Tools referred to) , PCLs, and big lettering on the bezels look 1) not so refined to me and 2) are a little to "look at me".

Less is more.

28 January 2010, 06:08 PM	#1
cshecks Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: Seattle Posts: 92	I think I am in the minority on the new subs I do not yet have a rolex, but, soon will. THe only models I have ever been interested in are the subs and exp's. I think the rest of the collection is a bit dainty for my tastes. Anyhoo.......... I am very partial to the current 16610. I do not like the maxi dial or case one bit and I dislike the LV even more. Which do you prefer just based on aesthetics?

28 January 2010, 08:14 PM	#4
Psmith "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Clive Location: Exoplanet Watch: spring-driven Posts: 38,856	Tough call... the 16610 is a bona fide design classic, but I like the updates as well as the greater heft. Can't go wrong if you get what you like best Cheers __________________

28 January 2010, 09:08 PM	#5
Tombstone "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Real Name: Richard Location: LV, NV Watch: LV Sub and others Posts: 2,689	The Sub family has a little for each taste. The old Sea Dweller was perfect. The Sub no date is old school tradition. The LV Sub is cool (if your into green) I love the ability to switch the bezel to black on the LV. The standard Sub, nice The Rolex classic. TT Sub blue or black for dress and for those who love the TT look. You can't go wrong with a Sub pick what you like and post photos as well, good luck. __________________ Always working...by choice

29 January 2010, 01:04 PM	#6
newsman Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Mike Location: Atlanta, GA Watch: Rolex DJ II. Posts: 56	Not to change your mind...but The new, larger (41mm) Datejusts II are hardly dainty!

29 January 2010, 03:05 PM	#8
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	Aesthetics - Sub Date, Explorer 1, GMT II and Daytona... __________________ TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)

28 January 2010, 06:36 PM	#2
Fredke Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Frédéric Location: Belgium Posts: 38	So do I. Exept I also like the GMT Master model, but my target is the Submariner 16610. Beside these models, I am not crazy about Rolex, but it is a matter of taste... Now, to be honest, with the Internet pictures I don't see the difference between the 16610 and the 116610, exept with the close up on the besel ingraved with "rolexrolexrolex". Aniway, I'll probably choose a "used" one.

28 January 2010, 08:05 PM	#3
Big_S "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Steve Location: San Diego, CA Watch: 16710 LN Posts: 61	The explorer II since it has a 24 hour bezel. The GMT II is nice as well, but with the PCL's, I agree it is a bit "dainty". I have no use for a rotating bezel, so the sub is out.

29 January 2010, 02:51 PM	#7
sakuraba "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: Jib Location: SJ, California Watch: sun dial Posts: 8,189	I love all Rolexes that don't have PCLs Seriously, the only watch the PCLs look good on are the Milgausses IMHO. As for the Subs, the most comfortable for my wrist is still the 16610. I really am not looking forward to the new ceramic sub, but the discontinuance of the current sub line can only be good for my 16610.

29 January 2010, 03:09 PM	#9
Tools TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Larry Location: Mojave Desert Watch: GMT's Posts: 43,342	I don't care for the block cases... I would like to get my hands on a few of those Glidelock clasps though..... __________________ (Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member

29 January 2010, 03:15 PM	#10
MikeyTX "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Michael Location: Skunk Hollow, TX Watch: Rolex 116613LN Sub Posts: 2,198	14060 for me I prefer the simplicity of the no date sub. It is the safest Rolex to wear on a daily basis. No bling. No one really notices it. __________________ JJ ........... Still missing you bro. May you enjoy the eternal peace the almighty has blessed you with.

29 January 2010, 03:18 PM	#11
dman Lifetime TRF Patron Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Daren Location: Austin Watch: the road Posts: 13,585	If by dainty you mean wears small, the explorer 2 because of the fixed bezel wears small. Especially compared to the 16610. __________________ You either get it or you don't, if you have to ask, YOU DON'T!! I really hope that midget cop doesn't find me in Kokomo.

29 January 2010, 05:10 PM	#13
mwag "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: australia Posts: 8	Not really a fan of the maxi dial to be honest and the case just looks a bit weird for me. Still a good looking watch though, just wouldn't want to wear it over my older subs.

29 January 2010, 05:19 PM	#14
cshecks Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: Seattle Posts: 92	I am in the process of trying to locate a 16610 and am having a bit of difficulty, I am attempting to buy new. One dealer in my area has 'hoarded' his few remaining 16610's....super annoying. Guess I will have to try BB as much as i prefer not to buy through them.

29 January 2010, 06:04 PM	#15
DarkHorse "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Dave Location: Sydney Watch: 118239 Posts: 413	16610 is a classic, can't go wrong __________________ The world is safe again... but for how long? Current: TAG Heuer 2000 Classic, Kobold Phantom Tactical Chronograph, Rolex Submariner 16610, Breitling Superocean Heritage Chronograph A13320 (Crowe Edition), Rolex Day-Date 118239

29 January 2010, 06:18 PM	#18
rickyslam "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Real Name: Ricky Location: City of Sin Watch: Hulk, DaytonaC, DJ Posts: 1,149	I love the 16610. It is my first Rolex out of my three. The only thing I want on it is the green bezel. I don't like the maxi dial, it looks too busy and doesn't seem elegant. That's my $0.02.

30 January 2010, 12:10 AM	#20
The GMT Master "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Chris Location: England Posts: 8,149	Well, having owned a Rolex with a new style clasp, I won't go back to the old style ones, and as such, the current 16610 doesn't interest me. Can't wait for the updated model

30 January 2010, 01:37 AM	#22
MURRAY "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Rick Location: Michigan Watch: for that TRF bug!! Posts: 275	The new ones are nice...the old ones are nice....personal preference...

30 January 2010, 01:49 AM	#23
kcmo "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Real Name: Karis Location: USA Posts: 19,377	Overall I prefer the 'old' style...can't go wrong with a 16610, or 16613, or 14060M, etc... I do really like the new TT black Sub though...I think it's the white writing and datewheel that I prefer on this model over the 'old' style.

30 January 2010, 02:17 AM	#24
warrior "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: massachusetts Watch: Explorer Posts: 1,691	I prefer the older style... though i prefer the old dial, i can live with the maxi dial on the new ones.... but the blocky cases ( as Tools referred to) , PCLs, and big lettering on the bezels look 1) not so refined to me and 2) are a little to "look at me". Less is more.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)