ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
1 February 2009, 04:49 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Manila
Posts: 222
|
GMT IIc/ Deep Sea (or Sea-Dweller as 1st Rolex)
Newbie here looking to buy my first Rolex and I don't want to regret & make a mistake. I always like to put a lot of thought to justify a purchase and it seems both new Rolex offerings are tickling my fancy. After trying the Deep Sea in the AD though, I crossed it out of my list being too big. I do like big watches (Panerai, Breitling) but the Deep Sea was way too thick.
So, now I'm inclined on he GMT IIc w/ ceramic bezel and the new bracelet. It seems Rolex did this very right. Only thing that turns me off is the green text but I could justify that its Rolex colors and they released this on their 50th anniversary. Also, looking at the Sea-Dweller since it will no longer be produced having been replaced by the Deep Sea. I think value for the old one will increase since I predict the Deep Sea will not be a long term commercial success. The GMT IIc is on the lead and I'm on the verge to get one. It's all a matter of how much savings I get buying it from a grey dealer or how little premium I need to pay-up w. an AD. Either or, seems like I'm going to be a proud owner of a ROLEX. First timer here and I think the brand is in its evolving stage. |
1 February 2009, 04:51 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Manila
Posts: 222
|
sorry mods, can you move this to the general discussions thread? thanks!
|
1 February 2009, 05:11 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
|
I think you KNOW which one you want and cannot go wrong with the 116710!
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches. 16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II, 2552.80 SMP |
1 February 2009, 05:17 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Yannis
Location: Europe
Watch: maniac
Posts: 9,070
|
GMT-IIc is the safest bet!
|
1 February 2009, 11:42 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Si
Location: united kingdom
Posts: 1,655
|
x2
Si |
5 February 2009, 03:28 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Ohio
Watch: GMT IIc
Posts: 63
|
Bought a GMT IIc a month ago MSRP $7,000 - 15% = $5,950 was the price from a AD
|
5 February 2009, 03:39 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: B
Location: UK
Posts: 976
|
GMT-IIC for you my friend
__________________
Current: 1: Rolex DSSD M 2008 2: Rolex Day-Date 40 YG White Dial Random 2018 3:Panerai Luminor Submersible Titanium PAM 25 2013 P Previous:[/B] 1: Rolex 16610 Y 2002 2: Rolex Daytona V 2008 3: Rolex 16610LV Z 2007 4: Rolex Milgauss 116400GV V 2008 5: Panerai Luminor Marina PR PAM 93 2005 6: AP ROO Diver H 2013 7: Rolex DJ II Slate w/ Grn Romans Random 2013 8:Panerai Submersible Ti PAM 25 2013 |
6 February 2009, 01:31 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Manila
Posts: 222
|
got my gmt IIc and loving it! thanks!
|
6 February 2009, 05:04 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Yannis
Location: Europe
Watch: maniac
Posts: 9,070
|
Congrats John!! Post some pics mate!!
|
6 February 2009, 05:34 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
|
Quote:
I definitely agree with your final thought & never really thought of it in those terms, but I like it. Some complain about the new offerings that seem to be coming from Rolex of late, but I agree that it's probably more of an evolving period that probably needed to take place to appeal to new (and a lot of former) owners. I've never really understood the hatred some have toward changing a classic...especially classics like the Sub & GMT that have been made for so many years. God knows there are enough made that anyone can get their hands on one even if Rolex stopped production on them all today. If you don't like the new stuff, great, go purchase a 'classic' and don't worry about the new stuff...we all know the watch will last a lifetime. Subtle upgrades are great IMO and only make the classics that much more classic. I can understand if the brand seemed to update their look every few years, but lets get real, after 30+ years, more than likely a model can stand to be 'improved' upon regardless of how loved the vintage model was. I love modern cars for their performance & reliability improvements (and some styling updates) but will always like 50's & 60's cars for their numerous timeless styling & pure driving qualities. Just because the modern day Corvette doesn't look like a 1959 Vette doesn't mean I should hate Chevy for updating the style & performance of the icon. Same applies to watches in my book. Congrats again on a beautiful watch. Cheers. |
|
10 February 2009, 11:27 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Leo
Location: Midwest
Watch: GMT-II 16710 PEPSI
Posts: 21,461
|
I have the GMT-II PEPSI and love the watch and its look. I think the GMT-IIc would be a great choice to buy,own and enjoy!!!
__________________
SS GMT-II 16710 PEPSI(Z-serial#) THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEN AND BOYS IS THE PRICE OF THE TOYS!!! MontBlanc Meisterstuck Doue Silver Barley MontBlanc Meisterstuck Solitaire Doue Signum Proud Card Carrying Member of the Curmudgeons.....Yikes!!! |
11 February 2009, 12:59 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: mark
Location: kent uk
Watch: ss daytona
Posts: 76
|
definately seadweller as it is an outgoing model and very desireable.
plenty of time to get a deepsea of gmt 2 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.