![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Fred
Location: Zurich
Posts: 2,697
|
A word in support of the new IWC Ingenieur
So today, I had a brief opportunity to handle the new IWC Ingenieur, a watch that has generally been welcomed with great fanfare until people realized what IWC intends to charge for it. I have read consistently that it was a fantastic watch but that it was completely overpriced, seeing as it had the same movement as a mark series.
After seeing the thing in person though, I can confidently say that I would pay 12k for it. And indeed I will, once I get the call. It’s a phenomenal watch in person. In terms of wearing experience, it has that same delicacy you get from a 5711 or 15202. it doesn’t quite have as beautifully sharp a set of indexes as a VC Overseas but then again, a. neither do those other two watches, and b. (for having had one for so long) I can confidently say the overseas feels less delicate overall. The main point of attraction on this new Ingenieur to me was the bracelet. It is a full class above what we know from IWC and has that „liquid“ draping quality to it that you’d otherwise have to go to the 5711 for. A sort of luxurious finesse that makes your typical watch bracelet in that price tier feel a bit blunt. At least that’s how my Rolex Jubilee felt next to it. Another frankly stunning aspect is the Aqua colored dial. The black is pretty, but pretty flat at the same time. The Aqua though, that’s something else. Altogether, what you get in terms of wearing experience is well above what you’d expect from a simple IWC three hander and in particular, in a different league to what you’d get in a Mark series or a pilot chrono (I got one of the latter). Granted, the movement is no different from the one in the Mark. But you don’t see it and provided it works precisely enough (always a bit hopes and prayers with IWC) it doesn’t much matter. It’s not like the 5711 has that fabulous of a movement either, it’s nice, but pretty basic too compared to what else Patek can do when they pour their heart into it. So for one third the price, if that’s the only difference (which you can’t even see given the closed caseback, the Ingenieur is almost a bargain. I know it convinced me. I‘m on the list and being told to look forward to a delivery later this year. They don’t expect long waiting lists over time, though I believe once this permeates beyond the initial reviews, it could well become quite popular.
__________________
Greetings from Switzerland Remember, the dignity you surrender at your AD‘s doorstep will never be recovered by wearing the watch he may get you. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Fred
Location: Zurich
Posts: 2,697
|
![]() ![]()
__________________
Greetings from Switzerland Remember, the dignity you surrender at your AD‘s doorstep will never be recovered by wearing the watch he may get you. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,137
|
Thanks for the first hand perspective. Still not a fan but maybe it’s because I haven’t tried it on. Hopefully everyone who wants one can get their hands on it in due time
![]()
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2022
Location: Le Brassus
Posts: 366
|
For me titanium is the one that impressed me. Although I’m not quite as sure about the €15k+ price tag.
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
|
My objection to the price has been less about the comparison to others from IWC, and more about relative price/quality vs competitors. For example, I doubt the movement is comparable to the Laureatto, but the price is almost as much. On the other hand, it’s 50% more than a Defy which comes also comes with an arguably better movement (based on one of the most legendary chronographs of all times).
Feels like IWC tried to price to what a Rolex three-hander was going for on secondary market back when pricing decisions would have been made… |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Fred
Location: Zurich
Posts: 2,697
|
Quote:
__________________
Greetings from Switzerland Remember, the dignity you surrender at your AD‘s doorstep will never be recovered by wearing the watch he may get you. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
|
Quote:
Though I could see your point particularly with the 42, because at that size you’d expect to be able to knock it around a bit. Maybe I’m just bitter that iwc neglected to return to the original 36mm size as an option ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,318
|
I’d like one, as long as I don’t have to buy a Portugueser and big pilot too
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: UK
Posts: 860
|
Can’t believe I’m saying this, because when it was released I thought it was awful. But I tried it yesterday at an event and I must say it was pretty great. But I still won’t buy one I think.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: USA
Watch: YM42 Ti
Posts: 2,617
|
Thanks for the information. Nice looking watch! Probably a tad to small for myself, but eager to see one in person.
__________________
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Asia
Watch: Audemars Piguet RO
Posts: 2,500
|
thank you for the review
can't wait for mine when it arrives, i heard its probably in july/august |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Real Name: Martijn
Location: Amsterdam
Watch: On the left wrist
Posts: 722
|
Thanks for the elaborate review. Also on the list for the aqua Ingenieur. Just have seen pics and vids, so I am anxious to get the opportunity to slap this one on the wrist and get the first hand experience.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: london
Posts: 369
|
I wasn’t that fussed either until I saw it and tried it in at W&W; immediately put my name down for it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Basel
Watch: LF Sport & Pepsi
Posts: 978
|
The comparisons to the 5711 or 15202 are amusing... But on a serious note: how would you compare it to watches in its comparative category, like the Zenith Defy, Bremont Supernova, or the Breitling Chronomat?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 46,343
|
Nice watch that I look forward to seeing in person. No way would I pay retail or AD discount on this one. In the pre-owned market, in a few years at 50-60% of msrp I could see picking it up.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: london
Posts: 369
|
Beats all of those by a country mile apart from the Defy (but the Ingenieur is still way ahead)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
|
Quote:
I always give an edge to what I call the "kingmakers" (JLC, GP, Zenith) whose movements are found in watches far better known and more expensive. To me, it's cool to have something from the "watchmaker's watchmakers" but that's personal opinion. That said, the Defy styling is slightly more avant garde and probably not universally appealing. Previous Classic incarnation was a bit more mainstream (but didn't get the El Primero and was titanium-only as I recall). |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Fred
Location: Zurich
Posts: 2,697
|
Quote:
Quote:
But if you go merely by the actual experience, that’s very different. What IWC has done here is looking at where the rubber really hits the road when you wear a watch. And for an IWC, like for any other industrial grade watch, be it a Rolex/Zenith/JLC/whatever, heck even for lower tier AP, that’s never really going to be the caseback. All the caseback ever does on these watches is show you what the advancements of CNC machining have been over the years. But none of it is truly pretty to look at until you reach the likes of a VC Traditionelle or a Lange Saxonia, and even there, things remain fairly basic. Granted, when you select a watch as a watch nerd, you may be thinking about how the movement is made, how it’s finished, what complications it may bear, etc. etc. But when the excitement of having a new watch has died down, or if you never were a watch nerd to begin with, you end up wearing certain watches the most that respond to an entirely different set of criteria. And this is where the Royal Oak and the Nautilus excel. They a. feel great when you wear them, b. you can do anything in them, c. they work great as status symbols and d. they are very delicate designs visually, with an elegance and finesse that other watches which fulfill a. b. and c. above often lack, while other watches that also have d., for example the Octo Finissimo, lack in a. b. and/or c. The new IWC is like the Nautilus and the Royal Oak in that way. It fulfills a. b. c. d. in a similar-ish fashion. Granted, at a lower level overall, but in a way where it costing 1/3 the price of the 5711/15202 seems more than fair. None of the „peers“ like the Zenith or Breitling do that in any way that would come close. They feel more „blunt“ for the lack of a better term. The same is true for the older 2010ish rendition of the Ingenieur btw. So that’s not to denigrate any other brands in comparison to IWC. So you have to choose, whether you want to wear something that feels less refined but that you know to have a slightly more meritous movement (albeit still industrial grade, it’s not like Zeniths were that pretty either), or something that feels quite amazing but where you‘ll be thankful the caseback is closed, so that you don’t have to look too closely at what’s inside. And in many respects, that too is not too different from a Patek or an AP. If you elect to spend 39k on a steel watch with a very basic three hand movement over the fantastic watchmaking in a gold case that money would get you at Lange or Vacheron, just to name a few mainstream ones, you’re not doing it for the movement either. You’re doing it for how the thing looks and feels on your wrist. I‘m confident that the more folks will experience this new Ingenieur, the more they’ll come to realize what it actually has to offer, and the greater success it will have. The initial rush on it already points into that direction. I have, in my entire life, not seen as many people push into an IWC boutique at once, and especially not on a weekday. All of them wanted to see the exact same thing and all of them wanted to get on the list after trying it.
__________________
Greetings from Switzerland Remember, the dignity you surrender at your AD‘s doorstep will never be recovered by wearing the watch he may get you. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
|
Thanks for the input, I too spend some time with it and I have to say my conclusion is the direct opposite. IWC/Richemont has hybris and charging brand tax way above what they should.
I agree, it is a nice watch and a very welcome release, but it should be in the $6-7,000 range IMO. The bracelet is nice but a) it has no micro adjustment, b) the clasp has an irritating overlap, i.e. you have to close one side before the other (instead of just closing either side like on e.g. the VC Overseas bracelet), and c) there is no facility to put the watch on a rubber strap. All of those items are hard fails IMO, I even suspect they will rectify them over time. More on IWC's pricing, and I took this up with the Head of IWC North America - here in the US IWC charges $,8750 for the new 41mm ceramic case with day and date complication, chronograph, etc while they are asking $8,950 for the Big Pilot 43 - a standard steel watch without even date function. There is something wrong with that equation (and it also makes the ceramic chrono 41 top gun very attractive...) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Fred
Location: Zurich
Posts: 2,697
|
Quote:
Look at the legendary Lemania chronograph. All Lemania ever did was make the parts in a somewhat consistent quality. Omega then refined that into the 321, a somewhat pretty but not particularly refined workhorse. At the same time, both Patek (back until the 5170) and VC (to this day) made some of the most beautiful chronographs on the market out of those same parts by virtue of how they finished them. Back in the day, both parts of that process were quite admirable. While the engineering of the movement layouts was not necessarily that difficult (they’re often pretty basic, at least that Lemania sure is), sourcing parts of consistent quality from all the subcontractors and workers who often made them in their homes was really hard. That’s why the brands like Patek and VC did not traditionally do that themselves but liked to have a Lemania or JLC be a one stop shop to get these things from. Today things are very different. In the age of CNC, the machined parts fall out of the lathe in absolutely consistent quality. You don’t need a separate company sitting in some remote mountain valley who knows what to get from which farmer at what time of day before they get too drunk anymore. You can just throw on the machine and make some more in your factory‘s ground floor, while your workers concentrate on the finishing they perfected over centuries. And that’s also why the high tier brands still flourish while the traditional motoristes like JLC and Zenith struggle and kling to the few distinctive designs they released over the years to remain relevant. The horribly overplayed and overextended Reverso story is a good example of that and the El Primero isn’t much better. The only way to be successful as a motoriste today is in a large group, where you can put all the CNC lathes into one place. That’s what makes ETA so successful within the Swatch Group, and the lesser known Valfleurier (that also makes 90% of that IWC movement btw) within Richemont.
__________________
Greetings from Switzerland Remember, the dignity you surrender at your AD‘s doorstep will never be recovered by wearing the watch he may get you. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
|
Quote:
![]() On that note, curious your thoughts on some other "contenders" in this category we hear from on here: Tonda Polo Alpine Eagle I know the larger versions are typically in vogue around here, but I've noticed these as all are available in 36 as well. I'll have to go try the IWC at some point, just to know what all the hype is about, and perhaps my entire tune will change. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Fred
Location: Zurich
Posts: 2,697
|
Quote:
The Alpine Eagle is a more robust construction, it lacks elegance both as a design and in how it’s executed, in my eyes at least. Like the VC Overseas it’s „sturdier“ than the IWC, in the same way that a Mercedes All-Terrain Model is sturdier but less elegant than the equivalent regular model without the black plastic on the wheelarches. But it isn’t as well finished as an Overseas either. Plus I just don’t like the placement of those screws visually. So not a fan of that one, but it’s very subjective. The Polo I never really had an interest in, so can’t really speak to that one. With its lugs it’s more of an Aquanaut adjacent design and less of an integrated one. But FWIW I‘d expect it to do pretty well in the finesse of how it wears/feels. That’s something Piaget is typically pretty good at.
__________________
Greetings from Switzerland Remember, the dignity you surrender at your AD‘s doorstep will never be recovered by wearing the watch he may get you. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
|
Quote:
I should also admit, I'm not a great IWC lover these days, but that's largely because (as I believe we've discussed previously) of the fact that it loves to brag about its history of developing watches for the Luftwaffe, though having scrubbed that word from its marketing materials. It has not, on the other hand, realized the irony in engraving the back of the Mk series (developed for the RAF) with a Luftwaffe aircraft. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Fred
Location: Zurich
Posts: 2,697
|
Quote:
But as much as all of that is hard to take seriously, I am still one to give credit where credit is due on that new one. I also have to say that while I have as much of a bad view of that whole pilot watch subject as you, I do like the people at IWC a lot. All of those I interacted with, from the top down and from the bottom up, have been great folks that do their jobs with great passion. So I maintain a lot of respect for what they do despite the obvious misstep with the pilot line. To the point where I actually do own and actually quite like to wear a pilot chrono. Because difficult history and stupid marketing aside, it is a very nice watch to wear. And a very practical one on top of that. As for the GP, it’s hard to pinpoint. I think it’s due to the proportions. The 42mm is obviously huge and covers the wrist like some sort of medical device, so there it’s clear, but on the 38 it’s hard to say, I think for the lack of a better description it’s the verticality of a slightly thicker watch with a slightly smaller diameter that, in addition, has very strong vertical lines from the bottom of the case up, all the way though the sides of the bezel. It has no crown guards either, which accentuates the verticality, same for that two layered bezel, that gives it even more visual depth. Then it has a bracelet that becomes thicker as it gets to the watch head, which makes the head and the endlinks one big chunk. The continuity of the shapes as the watch transitions into the bracelet is also different, the GP is more of a round watch, going into an integrated bracelet, whereas the IWC is almost a rhombus, with a straight flow into the bracelet. That all makes the GP feel thicker/higher, and thus sturdier, even when it isn’t according to objective measurements.
__________________
Greetings from Switzerland Remember, the dignity you surrender at your AD‘s doorstep will never be recovered by wearing the watch he may get you. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Asia
Watch: Audemars Piguet RO
Posts: 2,500
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Asia
Watch: Audemars Piguet RO
Posts: 2,500
|
Quote:
last year lake tahoe was a hit and there's actually a waiting list for a IWC. amazing. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
|
Quote:
The BP43, on the one hand, was probably priced based on the price of the original BP (which does have a substantially more special movement), and lowered accordingly. Pilot chronographs, on the other hand, seemed to have worked their way up from the basic Pilot watches, with adjustments for materials, etc. So, when you compare the two BPs, pricing makes sense, same as when comparing the Top Gun 41 to the steel version and the steel version to the Mk XX. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Paris
Posts: 3,569
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Fred
Location: Zurich
Posts: 2,697
|
The bracelet was not sized, not my watch. I trust mine will end up sitting more naturally on my wrist.
__________________
Greetings from Switzerland Remember, the dignity you surrender at your AD‘s doorstep will never be recovered by wearing the watch he may get you. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.