Seamaster Ceramic & Sedna Gold owners???

[jed11]

Had my eye on the ceramic and titanium version but putting this one on the wrist has given me second thoughts…now heavily leaning towards this one. Looking to add a sporty, dedicated rubber watch to the collection. While the SS seamasters are lovely, they just feel similar to my other SS watches.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Nodzex]

That is a beautiful piece. If you can afford, add!
It’s been on my list for some time now even though I have 3 more of the same model, LOL
I just love them.

[jed11]

Originally Posted by Nodzex

That is a beautiful piece. If you can afford, add!
It’s been on my list for some time now even though I have 3 more of the same model, LOL
I just love them.

Which SMP 300's do you have out of curiosity? Any of them in ceramic?

[JP123]

I had the ceramic and titanium version. Very comfortable watch and loved that it had no date. Really enjoyed it and regret letting it go tbh.
I like this Sedna version too but its a bit close to something else I own

[1William]

Great looking watch.

[jed11]

Originally Posted by JP123

I had the ceramic and titanium version. Very comfortable watch and loved that it had no date. Really enjoyed it and regret letting it go tbh.
I like this Sedna version too but its a bit close to something else I own

Rolex Yachtmaster?

[RW16610]

This is a nice looking watch!

[Gladiat0r]

GET IT.

It’s an awesome watch. I had the ceramic and titanium version first, then traded it for the ceramic gold one.

It’s a stunner but also understated. It’s one of the few watches I’ve owned where I’ve had strangers actually compliment it. My wife says it’s her favorite watch I own and she was hoping Omega made a 37 or 39mm version because she wants one (any recommendations here?).

I wear it 3-4 days a week. It holds up to scratches and the elements better than anything I’ve owned. Truly love this watch.

The only thing I will say about it that could be a negative is that it is a large watch. It doesn’t sit tall which is great. But it is on the bigger side and has presence so you need to have the wrist for it and be ok with that.

[jed11]

Originally Posted by Gladiat0r

GET IT.

It’s an awesome watch. I had the ceramic and titanium version first, then traded it for the ceramic gold one.

It’s a stunner but also understated. It’s one of the few watches I’ve owned where I’ve had strangers actually compliment it. My wife says it’s her favorite watch I own and she was hoping Omega made a 37 or 39mm version because she wants one (any recommendations here?).

I wear it 3-4 days a week. It holds up to scratches and the elements better than anything I’ve owned. Truly love this watch.

The only thing I will say about it that could be a negative is that it is a large watch. It doesn’t sit tall which is great. But it is on the bigger side and has presence so you need to have the wrist for it and be ok with that.

Great to hear! Yeah I was first initially looking at the ceramic and Ti version as that, on paper anyway, is more rugged and likely hold up more to daily wear. But honestly, it didn’t feel special when next to the Sedna version…felt like a regular Seamaster.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Gladiat0r]

Originally Posted by jed11

Great to hear! Yeah I was first initially looking at the ceramic and Ti version as that, on paper anyway, is more rugged and likely hold up more to daily wear. But honestly, it didn’t feel special when next to the Sedna version…felt like a regular Seamaster.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I traded my Ceramic Ti version for the Ceramic Sedna for this very reason.
The Sedna one is just as rugged, but it feels special.
A big upgrade for me too, which isn’t mentioned much, is the finish on the bezel. The Sedna version has a rough “sandblasted” type finish with blacked out markings. It’s a totally different looking watch.

[jed11]

Originally Posted by Gladiat0r

I traded my Ceramic Ti version for the Ceramic Sedna for this very reason.
The Sedna one is just as rugged, but it feels special.
A big upgrade for me too, which isn’t mentioned much, is the finish on the bezel. The Sedna version has a rough “sandblasted” type finish with blacked out markings. It’s a totally different looking watch.

Absolutely…that bezel is what seals the deal for me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[JP123]

Decided I couldn’t hold off any longer. I’ve always regretted letting the ceramic/titanium one go and when one of these come up on Watchfinder, it reawakened the urge. Went to the Omega boutique to try one on and see if any reason not to take the plunge and couldn’t think of one :) It’s just a great looking watch to me that ticks so many boxes - sporty but not overly, lightweight, incredibly comfortable, premium touches that are done stealthily, not seen everywhere, don’t need to baby it… It’s my ideal daily watch. Should arrive this week :)

[1William]

Congratulations. Post some pictures when it arrives.

[Emiliomcol]

OP, this is a really great watch to get very light but very nice and appealing. You won’t regret it.






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[JP123]

Got mine today :) Very happy! Unfortunately I have no idea how to post pics on this site so you’ll just have to take my word for it

[JP123]

One observation having gone from the green Seamaster Diver straight to this one is that the rubber Omega uses in the strap for the ceramic models is much softer and more comfortable than in the (already comfortable) steel versions.

[1William]

Originally Posted by JP123

Got mine today :) Very happy! Unfortunately I have no idea how to post pics on this site so you’ll just have to take my word for it

Congratulations.

[shalako]

Another owner here, I recently picked one up and it’s currently the favourite in my collection, I also used to own the standard ceramic/titanium version and upgraded to this one, the Red Sedna Gold blends perfectly with the Black ceramic case and bezel.