ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
6 December 2014, 07:51 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: NY
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 42
|
Any Rolex looked at as "cheap"
Hey all...so I got my Explorer 1 (39mm) a week ago and really do love it. It wears so well on my wrist and the 3,6,9 which I originally didn't like (originally liked the DJ2) are really growing on me. Cool lum too! Love that I can wear it with a suit and jeans alike.
So what I'm wondering is...do you guys feel that 1 Rolex is looked as as "cheap" compared to others? Do people feel that an Explorer 1 is like the "entry level" Rolex and not as a "real Rolex" ? I know it sounds funny as the watch is still over $6,500 but I'm just wondering what you all think. Thought it would be a good discussion. |
6 December 2014, 07:53 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: The aperture
Posts: 4,941
|
In a Rolex range, the Explorer 1 is de facto the "cheapest watch" - not saying it is cheap.
I am currently contemplating getting the 214270 as part of my collection due to the fact it is cheap - but looks $$$. |
6 December 2014, 07:57 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,920
|
It's all relative.
|
6 December 2014, 08:01 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: earth
Posts: 794
|
Explorer 1 is certainly not cheap furthermore it is not entry level Rolex. The 34mm oyster perpetual is entry level and that is not cheap either.
Rolex and cheap do not go hand in hand. It's a matter of taste, some people like simplicity. PS I saw a photo of Matt Damon wearing the Exp 1. Hope that helps and enjoy your nice watch. |
6 December 2014, 08:01 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
|
a watch can be bought for two pounds , rolex arent cheap ,,,
|
6 December 2014, 08:03 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Dustin
Location: USA
Posts: 1,980
|
I wouldn't consider any Rolex watch cheap - from a pricing or quality standpoint.
|
6 December 2014, 08:16 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Your Six
Posts: 1,500
|
I have been blessed to own a few Rolex watches and recently acquired an Explorer I 39mm; certainly not because of its price but because of it's looks, and understated ruggedness. it is a great go-to do everything watch as it's a sporty dress watch and a dressy sports watch - very versatile.
To your point I would say that there are those who think that Oyster Perpetuals, Air Kings, Explorers and even no date Subs are "entry level" Rolex watches. Of course there are also those who think that two-tones are for folk who cannot afford all gold. Some look at a vintage Rolex and figure that your grandfather left it to you and you can't afford your own. The of course there are those who think anything less than a PM Rolex is "lesser" or "cheap" as you say. OTOH, there are those who think that PM sports models are showy and of poor taste. Then there are those who think that all Rolex watches are either fake or too expensive. Are you getting tired of reading my thoughts on what others think? If you are - then you get my point. I say to what others think! Enjoy the daylights out of your Explorer I; I know I will mine for it it is a great watch.
__________________
Time and tide wait for no man. |
6 December 2014, 11:05 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ USA
Watch: To many to count
Posts: 766
|
Cheap Rolexi show up on E-bay all the time. But no real Rolex will ever be cheap. However it might be a bargin at times.
__________________
Omega Planet Ocean 600m Chrono 45.5mm Tudor Heritage Chrono (blue) 42mm Breitling Chronomat GMT 44mm Tudor Black Bay Bronze 43mm KRB Imaging and Photography |
6 December 2014, 11:20 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: N/A
Posts: 679
|
Quote:
I too believe "cheap" is relative. Some would even say a Patek is cheap. Well there are those who would also say Patek looks cheap. So to each his own, really... |
|
6 December 2014, 11:26 AM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,367
|
I don't think it is cheap in any sense of the word. We can get a bit insulated here but in the real world any Rolex is considered largely astronomically priced.
|
6 December 2014, 11:32 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
I love the Explorer 1. Enjoy the heck out of that versatile watch.
|
6 December 2014, 11:40 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 1,207
|
The aquanaut is the cheapest Patek, is it really cheap? 20k plus
|
6 December 2014, 11:42 AM | #13 | |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Tissot, c. 1960
Posts: 34,434
|
Quote:
Some are truly naive and some are just asshats. It is just best to change the subject and disengage from that person as quickly as possible. Cheap and entry-level are terms that do not apply to Rolex watches.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
|
6 December 2014, 11:45 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Virginia
Watch: Sub/Polar/OP/BB
Posts: 4,645
|
Cheap definitely not the word, just different. Rolex supports a wide range of taste and budgets. Just starts off at what most people would say higher end.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
6 December 2014, 11:47 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 1,207
|
Or maybe a calatrava heck idk
|
6 December 2014, 11:52 AM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Roger
Location: ...
Watch: AP/Rolex/PP
Posts: 6,309
|
There is nothing CHEAP about ANY Rolex. Whether that be quality or price or value. PERIOD. one of the things over the years that has always 'irked' me -was hering someone say 'I don't want a Submariner...EVERYONE has one....' which is VERY untrue.
I walked a friend of mine out of an AD And said -take 10 mins and count 'EVERYONES' submariners for me...he came back in and said.. Good point. |
6 December 2014, 12:48 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: So. California
Posts: 9
|
Rolex and cheap just don't go together. I love all the Rolex models, perfection to the limit!
|
6 December 2014, 12:55 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Earth
Watch: 116610
Posts: 3,455
|
This. Remember, you can get a $50 Casio that sets itself to the atomic clock. The only time cheap and Rolex should be mentioned together is: A Rolex is not cheap.
__________________
NEVER ARGUE WITH AN IDIOT. FIRST THEY WILL DRAG YOU DOWN TO THEIR LEVEL. THEN, THEY WILL BEAT YOU WITH EXPERIENCE. |
6 December 2014, 01:02 PM | #19 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Seth
Location: nj
Watch: Omega
Posts: 24,824
|
Who cares.
Let that shyte go.
__________________
If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it? IG: gsmotorclub IG: thesawcollection (Both mostly just car stuff) |
6 December 2014, 01:04 PM | #20 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Denver
Watch: This and that...
Posts: 1,643
|
To me only Rolex's with gold and diamonds look cheap. Steel watches are the classics and what Rolex is about IMO. The simpler the better, it says you have class, you are successful ,and confident.
My first watch was an Airking which I have had for over 25 years, since my wife wears it now, I wear a GMT which for me is Rolex's Jack of all trades, especially since I work in two different time zones... My favorite watch is the Sub. no date, like the explorer 1, it's classic, beautiful design and it does one thing very well, tell precise time. The Zen watch : ) |
6 December 2014, 01:10 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: USA
Watch: SubC LV
Posts: 1,821
|
36mm DJ jubilee and air king!(i will crucified for saying that!):)
|
6 December 2014, 01:11 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: 1738 mi to Vegas
Watch: 16613, 116710LN
Posts: 234
|
What matters is how YOU feel? You feel cheap wearing it??
I've always loved the feeling I get wearing every one of my Rolex. Enjoy YOUR Rolex and don't care what anyone else thinks of it!!!! |
6 December 2014, 01:15 PM | #23 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 22,333
|
|
6 December 2014, 01:19 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Davey
Location: Australia
Watch: 1st or 2nd
Posts: 89
|
I'm staying away from this one... Wear your watch like no-one is watching, if someone picks it and thinks "cheap", that's their internal shyte at play, leave them to it and enjoy what makes you content.
|
6 December 2014, 01:24 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Patrick
Location: Texas
Watch: what I'm wearing
Posts: 5,943
|
The Explorer is one of the most simply elegant Rolex made. Anyone who thinks it looks cheap simply has little taste or appreciation for what a good looking watch is. Only my opinion, but I stand by it. Gorgeous watch, and I am always taken when I see one on someone's wrist. Every time, without fail.
__________________
TRFs "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Patron-Founding Member PClub # 10 74,592 The safest place for your watch is on your wrist. |
6 December 2014, 02:02 PM | #26 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,453
|
No such thing as an "entry level" or "cheap" Rolex..
Entry into what ?? and how is a 5,000 plus dollar watch "cheap" (ask your next door neighbor if that's a cheap watch) - it's all stuff and nonsense.. Who stays awake at night and thinks these myths up ???
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
6 December 2014, 02:04 PM | #27 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 1,142
|
"Cheap" implies a judgment. "Less expensive" is a better, more neutral term. And, to me, less expensive Rolexes like the Explorer and the SubC ND (which I have) are unmatched in their elegance, simplicity, and versatility, regardless of price. Lots of people on the forum also have more expensive references (including me) but come back to these classics for the majority of their wrist time.
IMHO, of course. Last edited by Case61; 6 December 2014 at 02:06 PM.. Reason: added a word |
6 December 2014, 02:09 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Real Name: Gregg
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 694
|
It's like saying you have the cheapest Ferrari....it's still a Ferrari with all its pedigree and function.
|
6 December 2014, 02:12 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,000
|
Who cares... the Explorer is beautiful, rich in history and the basis for the sports models.
|
6 December 2014, 02:37 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,842
|
Nope.
Sure, it's not made out of any precious metal, it doesn't have all kinds of nifty complications, the design is fairly straightfoward. But it's an amazing watch. I love it so much it kinda killed off my desire to get any other SS models in this price range with the exception of models with a clear caseback (get all weak in the knees for this feature). Now I am tempted by a Patek 5712 or AP ROC in SS, but that's an entirely different level... |
Tags |
214270 , explorer 1 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.