ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
22 May 2015, 07:43 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Earth
Posts: 9
|
authentic or fake
I got offered this Rolex, as a restoration project. I am just not sure if it is a Rolex at all... I would appreciate your help. thanks. Unfortunately I just have few photos, but i can not see serial...
|
22 May 2015, 08:21 PM | #2 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,677
|
It's a bad fake.
|
22 May 2015, 08:30 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Earth
Posts: 9
|
Clear, unfirtunately...
|
22 May 2015, 08:36 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,297
|
Do not restore it! Destroy!
__________________
|
22 May 2015, 08:58 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Earth
Posts: 9
|
I am not even goint to bother to pick it up...
|
22 May 2015, 09:33 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,199
|
Bad fake case is not even the right shape
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
watches many |
22 May 2015, 10:07 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Earth
Posts: 9
|
many thanks for brut answers :) :) :)
anyway, I did buy a submariner from the same source that needed a restoration and at the end it was a good deal and i was a happy owner of a sub with a nice story behind it... I was hoping for another story but this one turned to be a joke. :( |
22 May 2015, 10:24 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: london
Posts: 7
|
Good job!
|
25 May 2015, 11:17 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Zürich
Watch: Submariner 5512
Posts: 922
|
It looked better before
|
26 May 2015, 12:04 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Earth
Posts: 9
|
What exectly looked better?
|
26 May 2015, 12:30 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Dave
Location: miami
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 374
|
How come you bought from the same source when the first one was fake? Aren't you afraid the sub is also fake?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
26 May 2015, 12:46 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Earth
Posts: 9
|
Well he claimed for the first one that it is real and for the second one also. I was not sure about the second one and that is why I have asked.
|
26 May 2015, 01:47 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: World
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,733
|
second one looks like a fake as well.
You should be more careful with whom you are dealing with. |
26 May 2015, 01:52 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Earth
Posts: 9
|
Sub is as real as it can b ;)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
26 May 2015, 02:07 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: World
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,733
|
Then post a pic of the movement.
Rehaut looks dodgy |
26 May 2015, 02:16 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Earth
Posts: 9
|
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
26 May 2015, 02:33 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: World
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,733
|
movement authentic, but bottom bridge is corroded and the top bridge shows heavy wear from a loose Rotor.
I wouldn't have purchased this watch - no matter for which price |
26 May 2015, 02:39 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Earth
Posts: 9
|
You definitely shouldn't - I did it and I don't have any regret because I have bought a fantastic watch! :) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.