ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
2 September 2024, 05:42 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 3970
Posts: 3,877
|
Remaster02
Now that the dust has settled a bit, what does everything think about it? As the owner and lover of the Remaster01. I am strongly considering the 02.
Pics I've found in different places on IG/online to capture it... appreciate thoughts. |
2 September 2024, 06:01 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2024
Location: Argentina
Posts: 27
|
I love it and I am sad I didn't push harder to buy it.
I think the size is quite the issue for some people though. Not to throw shade but the remaster 01 seemed like a fake patina fake old watch. This 02 really seems like an old design mastered again. |
2 September 2024, 06:11 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: USA
Posts: 857
|
Watch is nice but priced above what I’m willing to pay
|
2 September 2024, 06:32 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Swiss
Posts: 29
|
Love it, asked it, waiting for it, but still don't know if it will be available for me... Hope some of you guys will got and wear that special piece
|
2 September 2024, 06:32 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: seoul
Posts: 2
|
Saw it in person and I love it. Hoping to get mine soon!
|
2 September 2024, 09:29 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Asia
Posts: 239
|
I've tried it on couple of months ago. Totally in love with it. Expressed my interest but doubt I'll be allocated.
|
2 September 2024, 09:42 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2023
Location: Europe
Posts: 259
|
Tried it on, really liked it (big fan of sand gold) but don’t think I can pull it off style wise, so didn’t ask for one.
But I hope they sell well as I’d love to see more from their back catalog in the future. |
2 September 2024, 10:03 PM | #8 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,353
|
I appreciate the design but it is not for me. Too expensive for what it is and don't know if I could work it into a rotation for significant wear. I also think that you would have to try this one on as the size and fit will not work for everyone.
|
2 September 2024, 11:25 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: SFO
Posts: 1,221
|
To me it's a joke of a watch.
Nice that they released something for the archives (kudos) but the size is way too large for a classic watch. Add to that the pricing is beyond outrageous for a basic two-hander |
2 September 2024, 11:45 PM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 3970
Posts: 3,877
|
Quote:
Remaster02 = 41,100 CHF; sand gold (similar to Lange Honey gold), three hander with ultra thin movement and special sapphire glass and 12 part dial. To be honest you don't want a date or a 3rd hand even though the movement can support both: Compared to: Patek 5226G Calatrava - with 3 hander and date; stamped dial = 35,400 CHF Patek 6700G - Calatrava with 3 hander and date ; stamped dial = 33,300 CHF Patek 5227R - Calatrava with 3 hander and date; stamped dial = 35,400 CHF Patek Aquanaut precious metals 5168G ; stamped dial= 43,200 CHF So compared to Calatravas perhaps about 20% overpriced. Compared to Aquanaut the price is fine? |
|
2 September 2024, 11:47 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,880
|
I really like it. Hope AP draws more inspiration from its back catalogue (Jules Audemars would be great to refresh as well).
__________________
AP 15500ST (Silver) // ♛ Rolex 126334 (Blue Roman, Fluted, Jubilee) // Ω Moonswatch (Mission to Pluto) // G-Shock GA2100-1A1 |
3 September 2024, 12:05 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,478
|
Still think it is a cool watch. But I would not bet on me (or anyone else for that matter) continuing to think it is a cool watch some 5 years down the road. As it is not only cool but also way out there and weird which may take over at some point.
|
3 September 2024, 04:52 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 3,847
|
Very cool watch. Would buy if I was wearing suits and driving a Rolls-Royce.
__________________
AP 15500ST Grey // 26237ST Beast // 26331ST Panda // 15450ST Blue // 77350CE Bucci // 26240CE 50th // 15407ST // 26715.ST.ZZ || Rolex 116520 White // 116710 BLNR // 126200 Blue || Omega Seamaster NTTD // Speedy Tokyo LE "Rising Sun" // Speedy cal. 321 "Ed White" A timeless classic - Winding, ticking, faithful time - Golden crown of trust |
3 September 2024, 05:23 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 3970
Posts: 3,877
|
|
3 September 2024, 06:27 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,900
|
I like it but the design and size wouldn’t work for my wrist
|
3 September 2024, 07:30 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Socal
Watch: AP/PP/Rolex
Posts: 2,023
|
I got to try one on when I was in Le Brassus couple of weeks ago. It's a cool piece for sure, but not for me.
__________________
PP 5205G-013/ PP 5212A / AP 15416CE /26574 st QP/ AP 50th 16202st /AP 15500st Black / AP 26405CE / AP 77350CE / AP 15551st / AP 67540sk / Rolex 116500 Panda / Rolex 126710 BLRO / Rolex 126610LV Green / Rolex 16570 Black/ Rolex 116300 Blue / Rolex 126710 BLNR |
3 September 2024, 01:34 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 67
|
Tried it on a few months ago. Dial and crystal are super interesting, not to mention the sand gold. Strap is also very well executed
But the size is way too big for most (see below, I usually wear a 26420.IO FYI) They really messed up on the lugs IMO and should’ve either 1) shrank the entire watch 2) remove the lugs and have the strap integrated with the case Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
4 September 2024, 06:28 PM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 3970
Posts: 3,877
|
Indeed, I am concerned over the size. I think -2mm would have been perfect. Just like my gripe with the Remaster01 was if they had made it manual wind and made it 2mm thinner it would have been perfection for me.
Quote:
|
|
4 September 2024, 07:01 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: UK
Posts: 401
|
in my humble opinion, the size is too big
__________________
Rolex Datejust / Rolex Day-Date Olive / Rolex OP36 Turquoise / AP Royal Oak Grey 15510ST/ Patek 5205-R Olive/ Patek 5167R / Patek 5212a |
4 September 2024, 07:03 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 67
|
Also a shame to make the watch so thick with such a thin movement
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
4 September 2024, 11:05 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: US
Posts: 4
|
Very cool - when pictured by itself.
Out of place, on every wrist I have seen it (in pics only - never saw one IRL). Both size and shape to blame. |
5 September 2024, 12:07 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 75
|
Totally agree, I was looking forward to seeing the real thing then when i tried it on.....or just doesnt click with me.
|
8 September 2024, 04:56 PM | #23 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: CA
Watch: es
Posts: 4,394
|
I still need to see it in person before deciding. From pictures, I kind of like it. It’s much different looking from the other AP collections.
__________________
Instagram @dcash0615 2FA security active |
8 September 2024, 05:05 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2022
Location: USA
Posts: 281
|
WHEN WILL AP LEARN A REMASTER DOESN'T MEAN MAKE IT 5000MM BIG!!!! I really want to love this watch, the same with the REMASTER01. They're too big, are their milling machines stuck on wumbo?
__________________
15510ST Green | 15720ST Gray | 26393QT Taupe | 116400GV | 126234 Mint |
8 September 2024, 09:27 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Switzerland
Watch: yourself
Posts: 1,275
|
How does something so expensive can look so cheap?
|
8 September 2024, 09:35 PM | #26 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 41,811
|
It is definitely different.
Looks like an '80s case design for a calculator watch from a distance. Could have used a quartz movement to complete that vibe. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
8 September 2024, 10:49 PM | #27 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: UK
Posts: 892
|
Quote:
Any ideas why it’s so big? There’s no crazy complication or anything like the zeitwerk |
|
8 September 2024, 11:29 PM | #28 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,195
|
Really great watch, but way too big (especially when compared to the original). I think a size between what they chose and the OG would have looked better.
|
9 September 2024, 12:58 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2022
Location: Canada
Posts: 113
|
Some things are meant to stay buried in the archives, never to be found again. This design is definitely one of them. Was it even a successful model in the first place to deserve a remaster? I highly doubt so. AP seems to be on some roll to make big dress watches, as if they believe they are relevant enough to change fashion trends. Why don't they take a look at IWC sales for a moment, they would realize big dress watches have not been a thing for quite some time. For that kind of money, I would buy an independent dress watch any day of the week before this. The new PF Toric for similar money looks so much better from top to bottom next to this AP, it is not even funny.
|
9 September 2024, 04:00 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2024
Location: HK
Posts: 31
|
It could look okay on an NBA player, but what NBA player is gonna go for this?
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.