ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Jocke · 2 May 2007, 01:17 AM

Check it out.

http://www.watchwallpapers.com/subtest.htm

Jocke

OysterDavid · 2 May 2007, 01:22 AM

I can only imagine how you roadtest your vehicles!

padi56 · 2 May 2007, 01:26 AM

Good job it was one of those wongtyme special extra hard duty Folex.

jac67 · 2 May 2007, 01:27 AM

Jocke, that's not another inside pictorial of Rolex, is it?

John.

Solo118 · 2 May 2007, 03:01 AM

Please tell me thats a Folex, Im losing breath here....

mlb · 2 May 2007, 03:31 AM

Wow! So, which watch passes your test?

nko51 · 2 May 2007, 03:34 AM

There is something fishy about the destructive progression of the Rolex!

JJ Irani · 2 May 2007, 03:55 AM

Good work, Jocke.

I do believe a real Oyster case is capable of taking a 60-ton pressure. In fact, I've read somewhere that it does take 60 tons of pressure to punch out the steel casing from the original slab of 904L steel.

Can anyone corroborate this fact?

Thanks - JJ

chris_nor_cal · 2 May 2007, 04:30 AM

my question is: was everything in normal working order when you froze the watch and then when you boiled it?

JJ Irani · 2 May 2007, 04:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chris_nor_cal

my question is: was everything in normal working order when you froze the watch and then when you boiled it?

Hmmm....I doubt very much whether anyone would do that to a genuine Rolex....and if they did, then they'd have to answer to me!!

So I guess, we can only assume that that's a fake.

JJ

Jocke · 2 May 2007, 04:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chris_nor_cal

my question is: was everything in normal working order when you froze the watch and then when you boiled it?

Yes the watch works fine after the boiling, it stops
when the crystal leave the case.

Jocke

mikey · 2 May 2007, 04:54 AM

Jocke, this isn't the Ultimate Submariner Test. This test would only hold validity if it were a Genuine Rolex Submariner. You could have used a Quartz Casio G Shock or something and did the same thing..........I like your presentation and pictorial which is excellent. You did an excellent experiment. You shouldve used an Invicta Sub Clone. That would have been funny.

Jocke · 2 May 2007, 04:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikey

Jocke, this isn't the Ultimate Submariner Test. This test would only hold validity if it were a Genuine Rolex Submariner. You could have used a Quartz Casio G Shock or something and did the same thing..........I like your presentation and pictorial which is excellent. You did an excellent experiment. You shouldve used an Invicta Sub Clone. That would have been funny.

It haven´t work with a Invicta. haven´t you heard
they have soild middlelinks.

Jocke

SPACE-DWELLER · 2 May 2007, 05:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jocke

Check it out.

http://www.watchwallpapers.com/subtest.htm

Jocke

Jocke

And now please go to the AD to get it fixed again!

I'd like to see the expression on the AD watchmaker's face AND to see the BILL!

President · 2 May 2007, 06:35 AM

He bought a fake! Shouldn't he have been slaughtered by sheep yet?

diablojota · 2 May 2007, 06:40 AM

I think he gave the fake the punishment it deserved, Pres. And eh didn't say that he bought it. Even if he did, this was a worthy punishment for a Folex. It's just as enjoyable as the fake that someone put on the railroad tracks (posted here before).
I just about had a heartattack when I first saw the pics and wanted to lock my Sub in a safe until I noticed the folex.

SPACE-DWELLER · 2 May 2007, 06:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jocke

Check it out.

http://www.watchwallpapers.com/subtest.htm

Jocke

Funny stuff, that was!

And not THAT bad a fake btw. But there are many things that tell it's a knock-off, e.g. the wrong numbers on the underside of the end pieces and no serial numbers at six. But the dial and case are surprisingly well copied.

Jocke · 2 May 2007, 06:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by President

He bought a fake! Shouldn't he have been slaughtered by sheep yet?

I get it as a gift, I will never spend money on a fake watch. I have more of them.

Jocke

President · 2 May 2007, 06:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jocke

I get it as a gift, I will never spend money on a fake watch. I have more of them.

Jocke

Do you know Hans from the CW forum?

Jocke · 2 May 2007, 06:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by President

Do you know Hans from the CW forum?

Please help me out here.

Did Hans have a lastname?

CW Forum?

I need some more info to give you the correct answer.

Jocke

President · 2 May 2007, 06:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jocke

Please help me out here.

Did Hans have a lastname?

CW Forum?

I need some more info to give you the correct answer.

Jocke

Christopher Ward Forum

Jocke · 2 May 2007, 07:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by President

Christopher Ward Forum

Yes I know that Hans.

Jocke

2 May 2007, 01:17 AM	#1
Jocke 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Real Name: Jocke Location: Sweden Watch: A dozen of Rolex's Posts: 22,541	Just a tiny test of a beater>>>> Check it out. http://www.watchwallpapers.com/subtest.htm Jocke

2 May 2007, 01:26 AM	#3
padi56 "TRF" Life Patron Join Date: Jun 2005 Real Name: Peter Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng Watch: ing you. Posts: 52,946	Good job it was one of those wongtyme special extra hard duty Folex. __________________ ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder

2 May 2007, 03:34 AM	#7
nko51 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Real Name: Alex Location: USA Watch: TT Blue Sub Posts: 2,542	There is something fishy about the destructive progression of the Rolex! __________________

2 May 2007, 03:55 AM	#8
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,319	Good work, Jocke. I do believe a real Oyster case is capable of taking a 60-ton pressure. In fact, I've read somewhere that it does take 60 tons of pressure to punch out the steel casing from the original slab of 904L steel. Can anyone corroborate this fact? Thanks - JJ __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

2 May 2007, 04:30 AM	#9
chris_nor_cal "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: CA Posts: 688	my question is: was everything in normal working order when you froze the watch and then when you boiled it? __________________

2 May 2007, 01:22 AM	#2
OysterDavid Banned Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: S F Bay Area Posts: 621	I can only imagine how you roadtest your vehicles!

2 May 2007, 01:27 AM	#4
jac67 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: John Location: Australia Watch: Me Posts: 1,950	Jocke, that's not another inside pictorial of Rolex, is it? John.

2 May 2007, 03:01 AM	#5
Solo118 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: USA Watch: Daytona Posts: 6,082	Please tell me thats a Folex, Im losing breath here....

2 May 2007, 03:31 AM	#6
mlb Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Real Name: Mike Location: Chicago, Illinois Watch: DJ Posts: 753	Wow! So, which watch passes your test?

2 May 2007, 04:54 AM	#12
mikey "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: USA Watch: Oysterdate 6694 Posts: 2,713	Jocke, this isn't the Ultimate Submariner Test. This test would only hold validity if it were a Genuine Rolex Submariner. You could have used a Quartz Casio G Shock or something and did the same thing..........I like your presentation and pictorial which is excellent. You did an excellent experiment. You shouldve used an Invicta Sub Clone. That would have been funny.

2 May 2007, 06:35 AM	#15
President Banned Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: M.Thatcher MP Location: Le Locle Watch: Bear Grylls Posts: 2,913	He bought a fake! Shouldn't he have been slaughtered by sheep yet?

2 May 2007, 06:40 AM	#16
diablojota "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Real Name: Frank Location: Chattanooga, TN Watch: SS Submariner Date Posts: 4,042	I think he gave the fake the punishment it deserved, Pres. And eh didn't say that he bought it. Even if he did, this was a worthy punishment for a Folex. It's just as enjoyable as the fake that someone put on the railroad tracks (posted here before). I just about had a heartattack when I first saw the pics and wanted to lock my Sub in a safe until I noticed the folex. __________________ RTFT - Read The Friggin' Thread FcB

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)