ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

jezec · 18 May 2020, 12:34 AM

Are there videos that show the side-by-side comparison of the two, showing the case shape, bezel colors under the same light, etc...?

Most of the videos compare the Tudor GMT to the 126710, but aesthetically the Tudor GMT actually looks more comparable to the 16710 than the newer ceramic version.

From pictures, they also appear that the Tudor GMT bezel color is closer to the 16710 Coke's rather than the Pepsi's.

samson66 · 18 May 2020, 12:50 AM

I have owned both. Don't have a side-by-side picture but the Tudor is significantly larger. The case diameter, case thickness, lug width and lug-to-lug height are all larger on the Tudor This is what drew me to the Tudor. I always found my 16710 to wear small for my liking.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S10 using Tapatalk

kieselguhr · 18 May 2020, 01:31 AM

A simple google search yielded this result.

https://youtu.be/cWmhApce5Do

Crazy Lugs · 18 May 2020, 01:52 AM

It wears slightly larger that a six digit Sub/GMT in my experience, with the inherent aesthetics of a 16710 as you noted. It’s 175g- significantly heavier/thicker that a five digit GMT, but one you can buy new for just under $4,000.

Mine holds its own next to a 114060- it’s more comfortable than expected and the thickness, while an initial concern, doesn’t really bother me at all on my 7.25” wrist. Accuracy is insanely good, and no issues at all with mine.

B2 Stealth · 18 May 2020, 02:54 AM

Love my Tudor BB GMT--looks nearly identical to Rolex GMTs with aluminum bezel. I own a new BLNR and it's a tough choice which to wear on any given day. The Tudor GMT bezel colors, WOW!

Swearengen · 18 May 2020, 04:29 AM

16710, Tudor and 1675. Love 'em all

18 May 2020, 12:34 AM	#1
jezec "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2016 Location: USA Posts: 53	16710 GMT Master II vs Tudor GMT Are there videos that show the side-by-side comparison of the two, showing the case shape, bezel colors under the same light, etc...? Most of the videos compare the Tudor GMT to the 126710, but aesthetically the Tudor GMT actually looks more comparable to the 16710 than the newer ceramic version. From pictures, they also appear that the Tudor GMT bezel color is closer to the 16710 Coke's rather than the Pepsi's.

18 May 2020, 12:50 AM	#2
samson66 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Mike Location: Downy Ocean Hon Watch: my money leaving! Posts: 13,707	I have owned both. Don't have a side-by-side picture but the Tudor is significantly larger. The case diameter, case thickness, lug width and lug-to-lug height are all larger on the Tudor This is what drew me to the Tudor. I always found my 16710 to wear small for my liking. Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S10 using Tapatalk

18 May 2020, 01:31 AM	#3
kieselguhr "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Real Name: Nick Location: Las Vegas Watch: 1601 Posts: 10,610	A simple google search yielded this result. https://youtu.be/cWmhApce5Do

18 May 2020, 01:52 AM	#4
Crazy Lugs "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2019 Location: USA Posts: 855	It wears slightly larger that a six digit Sub/GMT in my experience, with the inherent aesthetics of a 16710 as you noted. It’s 175g- significantly heavier/thicker that a five digit GMT, but one you can buy new for just under $4,000. Mine holds its own next to a 114060- it’s more comfortable than expected and the thickness, while an initial concern, doesn’t really bother me at all on my 7.25” wrist. Accuracy is insanely good, and no issues at all with mine.

18 May 2020, 02:54 AM	#5
B2 Stealth "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2020 Location: Midwest Posts: 1,710	Love my Tudor BB GMT--looks nearly identical to Rolex GMTs with aluminum bezel. I own a new BLNR and it's a tough choice which to wear on any given day. The Tudor GMT bezel colors, WOW!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)