The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17 August 2024, 02:04 AM   #1
RDN
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 16
Icon5 Rolex Explorer 1 40mm

Hello everyone,

I have a new Rolex Explorer 1 40mm and I am considering switching it for the new Rolex Explorer 2 Polar and an additional $4,500 in cash. Would you make the deal?

I appreciate any thoughts you have.
RDN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2024, 10:45 AM   #2
matthew P
"TRF" Member
 
matthew P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 426
If you have the wrist for it…… IMO > 7.5…..
then hell yes .
I’d love to daily an expII polar.

I however have smaller wrists so I prefer the 124270 in 36mm, the polar dwarfs my wrist.

If you prefer it visually then why not


..Explorer, Spring Diver & APRO..
matthew P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2024, 10:53 AM   #3
BillA
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: US
Posts: 3,833
I own the 40mm Explorer 1.
It wears totally different than the Expl 2 so you should try it on before purchase.
As far as the trade numbers, can’t comment on what is acceptable to you.
BillA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2024, 11:07 AM   #4
rohada
"TRF" Member
 
rohada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: NC
Posts: 371
MSRP between the two is about $2000, I think. Is the ExpII polar commanding significantly more than MSRP in the marketplace? $4500 additional cash seems steep to me, so hoping others more intimate with the market for this watch can chime in. If you paid sales tax on top of the original purchase, it just seems to be worse of a deal, but what do I know? In NC that would put you just over $12,700 for an ExpII. The heart wants what the heart wants. I have a 16570 polar and I do love it. I'd try on both a 40mm and a 42mm before doing anything, if you haven't already. I wish you well.
__________________
♛Explorer II 16570 | ♛Submariner 14060M | ♛SDDS 116660 | ♛GMT Master II 126710BLRO | ♛Daytona 116503
rohada is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2024, 11:12 AM   #5
PBJ1925
2024 Pledge Member
 
PBJ1925's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Real Name: Jay
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: 326934
Posts: 2,298
Financially that's a no brainer with condition / yr being relatively equal.
PBJ1925 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2024, 11:32 AM   #6
Sunny Arizona
"TRF" Member
 
Sunny Arizona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Brad
Location: Colorado
Watch: 16613
Posts: 1,263
Too much cash. Should be around 2500
__________________
2 Factor Authentication
Sunny Arizona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2024, 12:08 PM   #7
0nly5iv3Digits
"TRF" Member
 
0nly5iv3Digits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: EARTH
Watch: What is "watch"?
Posts: 1,091
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunny Arizona View Post
Too much cash. Should be around 2500
Agreed.

OP you're getting ripped off at 4,500.00 on top...
__________________
UNpolished or I’m not interested” 😎
2FA Enabled
0nly5iv3Digits is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2024, 07:06 PM   #8
996marty
"TRF" Member
 
996marty's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Uk
Watch: RolexGMT/Tudor7928
Posts: 3,732
As mentioned the cash to pay is too much. Tbh I’d keep what you already have
996marty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2024, 09:50 PM   #9
travisb
2024 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,046
I'd definitely do it but only with less cash out of your pocket.
I'd look elsewhere if they're not willing to negotiate.
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2024, 10:16 PM   #10
GMTmatt
"TRF" Member
 
GMTmatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: Matt
Location: USA
Watch: 16710 Pepsi
Posts: 173
I like the explorer 1 better, keep what you have.
__________________
Cash is king, cash flow is queen
GMTmatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2024, 10:25 PM   #11
majidessa
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: .
Posts: 351
Quote:
Originally Posted by RDN View Post
Hello everyone,

I have a new Rolex Explorer 1 40mm and I am considering switching it for the new Rolex Explorer 2 Polar and an additional $4,500 in cash. Would you make the deal?

I appreciate any thoughts you have.
Although I appreciate the gmt complication; however, the explorer I has a certain charm and wears much nicer on the wrist. If you want explorer II try to get it new from AD as these should not be hard to get.

As for $4500 trade markup, I would say hell no this is a ripoff
majidessa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2024, 10:38 PM   #12
MSL
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: UK
Watch: 124270,16570,P39
Posts: 135
Add,do not trade.Exp 1 and 2 make a nice collection,one dressier and one more sportier.
MSL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2024, 11:32 PM   #13
Gearjockey
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 543
I don’t know what it is about that Explorer-deuce. Polar is a siren song for a lotta folks.

I tried it on and it’s a big watch, not as big as Sky-dweller however.

Be patient. Offer $2,000 on top and work (slightly) from there. Market cool and cooling.
Gearjockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2024, 11:44 PM   #14
Barada7
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Rhode Island
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 410
Echoing the above that the Exp. I and Exp. II Polar would make an awesome 1-2 punch.
Barada7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2024, 11:58 PM   #15
1William
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 46,660
I like the trade for the Explorer II but it is not a fair deal for you. I would look at the 21 Series Explorer II which has the better hands in my opinion and a bulletproof movement. They should be very close on the deal for the Explorer or at least significantly less than what you were quote by your dealer. Good luck and let us know what you decide.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2024, 12:00 AM   #16
Lol-x
Facilitator
 
Lol-x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,391
Keep the 1.
__________________

Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be. ~Abraham Lincoln
Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy

ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim
Lol-x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2024, 12:21 AM   #17
KatGirl
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
KatGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Kat
Location: CA, USA
Watch: 126233 Wimbledon T
Posts: 6,943
I’d rather have the Explorer 1, though in 36.

Kat


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
KatGirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2024, 12:25 AM   #18
Roddypeepa
"TRF" Member
 
Roddypeepa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Real Name: Mark
Location: Southern England
Watch: DJ41 SubC SMP mast
Posts: 1,602
I own and adore the polar but this is too much delta. The ii is starting to trade under retail at least here in uk. It’s a couple thousand difference imo


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Roddypeepa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2024, 12:47 AM   #19
exp90
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: UK
Posts: 102
Agree with the majority, they wear very differently and both so nice that it seems a pity to cancel one for the other.
exp90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2024, 08:20 PM   #20
gregvisser
"TRF" Member
 
gregvisser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Greg Visser
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 568
I’ve had both and now only have the Explorer I 40 mm. Dresses up or down better than the II which screams tool watch.
gregvisser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2024, 10:59 PM   #21
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregvisser View Post
I’ve had both and now only have the Explorer I 40 mm. Dresses up or down better than the II which screams tool watch.
I don't have an EXP, but having a lot of experience with the 2, I would have to agree with this. Part of the charm, for me, of the 2.

That puts me solidly in the 'you need both' camp.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2024, 01:15 AM   #22
Jewel Runner
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2024
Location: NY
Posts: 16
No way. Unless you absolutely need the GMT function and/or like the Exp II $4500 more.
Jewel Runner is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.