ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 February 2007, 04:54 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,887
|
Sub/Date vs Sun/No Date
What eaxctly are the differences between the two ? Obviously the date feature and cyclops.Any difference in the bracelet,case,weight ? Anything else ?
|
15 February 2007, 05:19 AM | #2 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Different movement, different bracelets.
Sub-date has the SEL one whereas the no-date Sub is fitted with the non-SEL bracelet. Movement is the 3135 in the date one and in the non-date one is the 3130 Modified movement, now also with 31 jewels. Cheers - JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
15 February 2007, 08:53 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,082
|
JJ,
Is it safe to say that one runs better than the other? or will their accuracy be similar? |
15 February 2007, 09:53 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
Quote:
The only real difference between the two is the addition of a date feature in the 16610.(as far as movement) There are several menbers I'm aware of that report accuracy of +1 sec with the 14060m. Indeed I've talked about this with an AD who told me if an ND sub goes back to Rolex for repair, service, or regulation it's regulated just like it's COSC cousin. |
|
15 February 2007, 01:23 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Vernon
Location: C-a-n-a-d-a
Watch: 16600
Posts: 5,641
|
The no date sub also has a different style diver extension.
__________________
I'm just a cook... |
15 February 2007, 03:52 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Tony
Location: san francisco
Watch: Seadweller
Posts: 1,368
|
Is the 14060M case narrower (less deep) than the 16610?
__________________
It's a rarity that something popular is actually right... Wear 'em with PRIDE, y'all. |
15 February 2007, 11:09 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Alex
Location: USA
Watch: TT Blue Sub
Posts: 2,542
|
Simply put the difference is no date, and no chrono tag certification, otherwise a gorgeous watch. I have both.
|
16 February 2007, 01:38 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 275
|
Both look great, both are rough, depends upon whether you require to know the date everytime you see the time.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.